Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,473 Year: 3,730/9,624 Month: 601/974 Week: 214/276 Day: 54/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   That boat don't float
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 25 of 453 (520333)
08-20-2009 9:30 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Rahvin
08-20-2009 1:16 PM


Re: Re-storm
Rahvin writes:
If so, ICANT's view of the FLUD is irrelevant - unless the waters were still as glass for the entire voyage (in which case, how did the Ark move and wind up on a mountain, since that would preclude any current or even any wind), the Ark would have sunk.
(1) The viscosity of water could have been different at the time. It could have been high enough that it acted very closely to solid matter.
(2) The pressure from the fountains of the deep could have been great enough that it raised certain sections of the land creating mountains and hills. In other words, the mountains of ararat could have been formed from right underneath the ark.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Rahvin, posted 08-20-2009 1:16 PM Rahvin has not replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3313 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 29 of 453 (520338)
08-20-2009 11:58 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by lyx2no
08-20-2009 4:36 PM


Re: Storm?
I agree with pandion. I, too, have tried to explain the heating of the atmosphere due to condensation and water dropping down to creationists. I gave up years ago because I finally realized there was just no way creationists would understand it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by lyx2no, posted 08-20-2009 4:36 PM lyx2no has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024