I just have a problem with many interpretations of the finds that they make.
This would be an excellent topic in a new thread!
Very often people use this "interpretations" line to dismiss evidence but when asked to show an alternative interpretation they don't show up.
The alternative has to explain
all the evidence, manage to be not self-contradictory and have logic connecting the observations with the conclusions. Perhaps you'll be the first to show such a thing.
No one else has. No one has been able to find it on the web and bring it here. I'd be very, very surprised it you manage.
If you can't do it then drop the interpretations dodge.