Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,435 Year: 3,692/9,624 Month: 563/974 Week: 176/276 Day: 16/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Atheist attitudes.
Lithodid-Man
Member (Idle past 2952 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 24 of 121 (522027)
08-31-2009 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by hooah212002
08-26-2009 3:02 PM


Re: Benevolence
hooah writes:
Atheists just as well think the mindset of creationists and militant religious zealots are wrong. The difference is, we don't press our beliefs on people who think differently. We encourage people to think differently. We try to enlighten you and give you our opinion on why we think your worldview stinks. But for the most part, sites like this, and discussions like this, are started by the religious in an effort to push a certain way onto others. Atheists, for the most part, are just fine and dandy with you getting dressed up Sunday morning for church. I know I don't care. Just don't tell me I'm blatantly wrong for my worldviews.
Well stated. It reminds me of the two related studies done by Bob Altemeyer where he divided a sample of people into three groups. In one group of people he presented a scenario where Christanity would be remade mandatory in public schools. In the second group the scenario was you live in a Muslim country and Islamic education and prayer is going to be made mandatory in your child's school. The third group was presented with the scenario that from kindergarten on, students would be told that there is no god and any such beliefs would be mocked as superstitious.
Well, as you might predict, atheists and most religious people found all three scenarios distasteful and a violation of basic freedoms. Fundamentalist Christians, on the other hand, overwhelmingly found #1 to be fair while rejecting #2 & 3. That itself is no surprise. When questioned for details about the fairness of #1 given that children of other/no faiths are there, the common answer was that this is a Christian nation and if they do not like it they can go to private school or leave the country.
But in scenario #2 they said it was wrong to force Islam on a child of another faith because the rights of minorities must be respected in a democracy. What would surprise the fundamentalist, I believe, is that atheists did not support mocking of faith in public schools because they believed it violated the rights of the parents.
The second study done by Altemeyer presented people with the situation of a Christian teen having a crisis of faith and approaching an Atheist family for advice. He also reversed that situation to another group. Again, atheists and most Christians said they would refer the teen in both situations to another person, their parents, a friend, etc. i.e. they did not think it their place to discuss these issues with someone else's child. Fundamentalist Christians 100% said they would do everything in their power to convert the atheist teen, even taking them covertly to church. And, obviously, 100% agreed it was a violation for an atheist parent to deconvert someone else's kid.
Sorry for the long Authoritarian rant, I recently made a two-part video series on these studies on youtube (http://www.youtube.com/user/Lithodidman). And using that shameless self-promotion to seque to the OP....
I completely agree with most of you here, one the problems on YT (and the net in general) are trolls, whether they purport to be atheists, Christian, etc.A number of them are just omni-nasty, putting foul comments on anything they see. One particularly obnoxious troll is a 'Christian' (his description, certainly not by any definition I am aware of) that has now at least six accounts that are solely for the purpose of complimenting his own videos from his main channel and giving the illusion of support when he insults or bullies videos. Sad thing is the man is 40, not 17.

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by hooah212002, posted 08-26-2009 3:02 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Lithodid-Man
Member (Idle past 2952 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 35 of 121 (523629)
09-11-2009 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by kbertsche
09-11-2009 11:04 AM


Re: Benevolence
kbertsche writes:
I do not see the "chasm of hypocrisy" that you claim; it seems to me that there is a fairly level playing field.
Unfortunately this is the curse of the majority in any instance. Men/Women, White/Black, Gay/Straight, Atheist/Theist. The group in the majority often has a difficult time seeing the issues faced by the minority. They tend to see the playing field as level so therefore any complaint is viewed as ‘militant’ or demanding more than their fair share.
As an atheist I would love to be 'out and proud' but simply cannot do that and maintain my social status. I approach the line by being openly pro-science education (and yes I mean evolution). I work in a gray area between an Indian tribe and the school district. Many of the meetings I attend are opened with a Christian prayer. I do not have the slightest shred of doubt that if my colleagues knew I was an atheist that I would lose my job in a skinny minute. Not openly for that reason, but job gone nonetheless.
The hypocrisy is astounding. I regularly attend diversity training workshops, usually about once every three months or so. At the last of these workshops the facilitator was talking about the importance of religious acceptance as well (we mainly focus on race, sexual orientation, gender, and economic status) and my big boss interjected how she thinks that is a good point that we respect diverse religions, provided that we all agree that there is a God it doesn't matter what we call him. If I could have afforded to, I would have quit then.
What this shows me is that, on the whole in the US, bigotry against atheism is alive and well. And like minority groups throughout history, the slightest bit of self-acceptance or even admittance is looked upon as militant by some. I will absolutely agree that my Youtube channel often tends toward the Dawkins side, but it provides an opportunity to vent the frustration I experience in the 'real world'.
What pisses me off is that as an educator I have to be constantly vigilant about mythology entering my science classes. As a parent I have to explain to my child why he should politely refuse the Chick Tracts he seems to obtain on a weekly basis from school. As a voter I have to, nearly every election, help counter some anti-abortion or anti-sex education proposal coming down the pipes. As a college professor I had to defend my job before a panel because my teaching the currently accepted origin of the Earth was the same thing as "making fun of someone's religion in front of the class". I could go on and on, but I think the point is made. All of this because of a belief system I do not support. And if I fight back in even the most diplomatic fashion it is because I am militant.

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by kbertsche, posted 09-11-2009 11:04 AM kbertsche has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Taz, posted 09-11-2009 4:35 PM Lithodid-Man has not replied

  
Lithodid-Man
Member (Idle past 2952 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 92 of 121 (524131)
09-14-2009 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by dwise1
09-14-2009 5:48 AM


Re: Benevolence
Dwise1,
Just a great post, you nailed just about exactly my frustration level when talking to some people. It is not just the hypocrisy that is frustration but the seeming inability to recognize it that is frustrating.
I have, on several occasions, had someone politely inform me that their deity demands that I worship and praise him or else he will burn me alive forever. But, of course, there is no malice or hatred implied in such a threat. Oftentimes such a statement is tempered with some version of "I am no better than you" or "We are all sinners" which translates to "You and I are no different except that I have the intelligence and wisdom to recognize and worship the architect of the universe and so will be embraced for eternity in His loving arms while you are tormented for eternity. Outside of that small thing we are alike"
The point is, some theists seem to think it is acceptable say really foul things then play innocent or even take offense when you do not agree.
About the claims made by some that people like Dawkins and Harris have become so anti-religion that they have become what they hate. I have now heard this identical claim made enough times now to figure out it is another of those cute little memes people pick up and repeat despite being empty and meaningless. Even the Dawkins quotes used to support it are far to consistent to be anything other than a cut and paste (i.e. the same few quotes are used in order too frequently to be coincidence).

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by dwise1, posted 09-14-2009 5:48 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Lithodid-Man
Member (Idle past 2952 days)
Posts: 504
From: Juneau, Alaska, USA
Joined: 03-22-2004


Message 93 of 121 (524142)
09-14-2009 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Hyroglyphx
09-14-2009 1:41 PM


Re: Sanctimony
Hyroglyphyx writes:
Clearly you're not understanding the point of the exercise. I'm illustrating how if someone attacks religion it is socially acceptable, but is taboo for most anything else.
I have to disagree. In my experience (and as Dawkins notes repeatedly) religion is protected from attack far more than other opinions or institutions. We (unbelievers) are expected by society to accept that some people believe in things we do not. Mores dictate that we more or less let this go and do not force them to defend their belief. Certain theists, on the other hand, feel that they have the right to evangelize to just about anyone.
Several years ago we signed my oldest son up for a school sponsored extracurricular high school science class. The first day he came home, and said the teacher told him that the brain and nervous system is proof that there is a creator and life did not evolve. He told her that his dad was an evolutionary biologist, and she said (this is almost word for word) "Then your dad is a fool and doesn't know anything about science"
Long story short, I took legal action and got her contract with the district removed (she can still teach the class, but can no longer have it qualify for state funds). Now this was a fairly straight forward case. My issue with it is that so many of my friends and colleagues (some very liberal theists or atheists) thought I was too mean and made a bigger deal out of this than it deserved. One professor told me he understands that it was wrong of her to do this, but I really should not have injured her livelihood "just because I disagree with her worldview" (??!!!). Which is completely ridiculous. I have no issue with her view, except when she teaches it to my child using public resources.
What this shows is how much we have been conditioned to respect religion and treat it differently than other viewpoints.

Doctor Bashir: "Of all the stories you told me, which were true and which weren't?"
Elim Garak: "My dear Doctor, they're all true"
Doctor Bashir: "Even the lies?"
Elim Garak: "Especially the lies"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-14-2009 1:41 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-16-2009 9:33 AM Lithodid-Man has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024