Coyote writes:
But if you want to present some empirical evidence feel free to do so.
Maybe I’m wrong, but how does my post about scientific evidence for a young earth not follow the topic. God could not use evolution because the earth is young.
Coyote writes:
You reject the scientific method, and yet claim you are pro-science?
Many of the founders of the scientific method were Christian. Why would we reject it. These men were Newton, Galileo, and Kepler. We have a reason to study science. These men knew the world around them would make sense, because of the attributes of God. We know that there is a God who upholds the universe in a rational way (Gen 8:22). How does science work in a random chance world? What we have studied for hundreds of years could change tomorrow in an evolutionary worldview.
Coyote writes:
You just pick and choose the results you like, and reject the results you disagree with because of religious belief, and claim to be pro-science?
You confuse observable science with origin science. We refuse your form of origin science (not repeatable) were the belief in evolution (molecules to man) comes from and adhere to observable science (were we get technology).
Did you know the Bible teaches a spherical earth (Isaiah 40:22) written around 760-698 BC. But Pythagoras did not asserted a round earth until 570-500 BC or Aristotle’s work in 389-322 BC.
The Bible teaches the earth floats in space (Job 26:7) written around 2000-1800 BC. Greeks taught a flat earth that floats on water in 900-800 BC.
The expanding universe (Isaiah 40:22). Not till the 1920’s did Writz and Hubble demonstrate the expanding universe.
Life is in the blood (Leviticus 17:11) written 1400 BC. In 1616 AD blood is found to be the key factor in life.
Now the Bible was going against what the secularist were saying in those days, but we now know the Bible to be right.