Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   ICANT'S position in the creation debate
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 511 of 687 (524170)
09-14-2009 5:18 PM
Reply to: Message 507 by cavediver
09-14-2009 3:04 PM


Re: Incorrect statement
But I think then, that I got it right. I did say that as far as SR only is concerned both clocks will appear to be running slow to each other. Yes? The GR part modifies that as you describe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 507 by cavediver, posted 09-14-2009 3:04 PM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 512 by cavediver, posted 09-14-2009 5:36 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3663 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 512 of 687 (524172)
09-14-2009 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 511 by NosyNed
09-14-2009 5:18 PM


Re: Incorrect statement
But I think then, that I got it right.
Yep. The interesting thing is we can treat the gravitational part as acceleration*, and this helps us unify the two separate effects as just one combined space-time effect.
* standing still on the surface of the Earth, is equivalent to being accelerated at 1g upwards, but not actually going anywhere. This is because our world line on Earth - our natural motion through space-time - should be a path that looks like a 1g acceleration downwards. We see this briefly when we jump off things

This message is a reply to:
 Message 511 by NosyNed, posted 09-14-2009 5:18 PM NosyNed has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 188 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 513 of 687 (524190)
09-14-2009 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 503 by ICANT
09-14-2009 2:17 PM


Re: Time changes
So my clock or any atomic clock in a satellite at 11,000 miles that has not been adjusted to be in sync with the earth clock will be running 38,000 ns faster per day.
This is because of gravity and motion affecting the tick of the atom.
Is that correct?
Yes.
I actually thought we were discussing spacetime and it's existence.
If it existed what it was.
The question I raised was concerning:
Perhaps readers who are not familiar with the current impossibility of reconciling relativity and quantum theory, may be visiting this site expecting to find an answer to the question "what is space-time?". Alas, there is no answer.
Yes, I was wrong about what this sub-discussion is about. It includes your claim that someone would win a Pulitzer prize for figuring out what spacetime is. Obviously you got the wrong prize name, and you're frantically trying to avoid admitting it. Just as you are avoiding admitting your errors about Kant, about Godel, and that loonburger's page to which you linked.
You still have not faced the fact that all the support you have for the claim, that nobody knows what spacetime is, is an anonymous Internet posting by someone who appears to have made a serious mistake. See Message 477. Why should we accept his claim, when other professionals (including at least one participating in this thread) claim otherwise?
You still have not answered the "why are they right" part of my "Who says, and why are they right?" question. The scientists at the strings conference were posed a totally different question, so their responses are irrelevant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 503 by ICANT, posted 09-14-2009 2:17 PM ICANT has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 188 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 514 of 687 (524191)
09-14-2009 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 504 by ICANT
09-14-2009 2:25 PM


Re: Time changes
So what makes these two clocks report a different time?
Distortions of spacetime.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 504 by ICANT, posted 09-14-2009 2:25 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 520 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 10:35 AM JonF has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 515 of 687 (524192)
09-14-2009 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 506 by ICANT
09-14-2009 2:53 PM


Re: Re ICANT'S cosmos
I have just constructed 2 super bikes powered by dark energy engins.
You and I race off from earth on these two bikes and we are traveling at 99.99% the speed of light.
Now I really put the hammer down and begin to speed away from you at 99.99% the speed of light.
If that is what you are saying is possible in relativity I think I will disagree. Unless you can explain how that is possible.
I don't know what you mean, sorry. If we were travelling that fast, and were travelling zero relative to one another, and you put your headlights on, we would measure the light travelling away from us at 100% of the speed of light. If we were travelling towards each other at 99.9% of the speed of light and I lit my headlamps you'd measure it as approaching you at 100% of the speed of light and I would measure it travelling away from me at the same speed.
It is this effect that I am asking you about. We have measured it at speeds of 30kms and the speed of light doesn't increase as we move towards the source or decrease as we move away from it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 506 by ICANT, posted 09-14-2009 2:53 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 519 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 10:34 AM Modulous has replied

  
Izanagi
Member (Idle past 5237 days)
Posts: 263
Joined: 09-15-2009


Message 516 of 687 (524360)
09-16-2009 7:11 AM
Reply to: Message 496 by ICANT
09-14-2009 10:59 AM


Re: Re:Life
First off, I would like to say hello to all. I've learned a great deal reading this forum and this board in particular. It especially blew my mind when it occurred to me how the universe has always existed even though it is only 13 and some odd billion years old. And the idea that there is no before because there was no time sent shivers up my spine. I can see why it can be a difficult concept for some to wrap their mind around.
I would like a clarification from ICANT. I think I'm beginning to see what your argument for life is and why specifically you believe you can't create something from nothing and why it is easier for you to believe something is eternal.
If I understand correctly, your contention is that God created life because life cannot come from non-life. You mention that God breathed life into Adam, making Adam alive. Since life cannot come from non-life, as you argue, God must be alive in order to have given life to Adam. Now if God is alive and not eternal, then God must have been created because you believe that something that is not eternal must have a beginning and a creation point, right? And because life cannot arise from non-life, if God is alive and not eternal then something else must have created God, perhaps an even greater GOD. Since you can't believe that a greater GOD created God, but allowing life to come from non-life means, in your mind, allowing evolution a backdoor to legitimacy (even though evolution says nothing about how life came to be), you must believe that God is eternal. Have I got that right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 496 by ICANT, posted 09-14-2009 10:59 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 517 by Straggler, posted 09-16-2009 8:47 AM Izanagi has not replied
 Message 521 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 11:18 AM Izanagi has replied

  
Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 517 of 687 (524371)
09-16-2009 8:47 AM
Reply to: Message 516 by Izanagi
09-16-2009 7:11 AM


Re: Re:Life
you must believe that God is eternal. Have I got that right?
I think you are on safe ground assuming that ICANT thinks his God is eternal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 516 by Izanagi, posted 09-16-2009 7:11 AM Izanagi has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 518 of 687 (524386)
09-16-2009 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 510 by greyseal
09-14-2009 4:05 PM


Re: Time changes
Hi greyseal,
greyseal writes:
er, nooooo...I'm saying that the ones in space have to be adjusted for time dilation, for really realz.
Are you saying then that time dilation is a fancy way of saying the effects of gravity and velocity cause the clocks at height to run slower than those closer to the source of gravity?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 510 by greyseal, posted 09-14-2009 4:05 PM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 529 by greyseal, posted 09-17-2009 2:39 AM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 519 of 687 (524389)
09-16-2009 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 515 by Modulous
09-14-2009 7:12 PM


Re Light
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
I don't know what you mean, sorry. If we were travelling that fast, and were travelling zero relative to one another, and you put your headlights on, we would measure the light travelling away from us at 100% of the speed of light.
You lost me there.
Lets assume my bike can travel at the speed of light.
It is totaly dark.
I take off at the speed of light.
You wait one second and turn on a super light in the identical path
I left in. I never change course so the light is always traveling in the identical direction I am.
Will that light catch up to me or will I remain in darkness forever?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 515 by Modulous, posted 09-14-2009 7:12 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 522 by Modulous, posted 09-16-2009 11:26 AM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 520 of 687 (524390)
09-16-2009 10:35 AM
Reply to: Message 514 by JonF
09-14-2009 7:03 PM


Re: Time changes
Hi JonF,
JonF writes:
Distortions of spacetime.
So what causes those distortions?
God Bless,

This message is a reply to:
 Message 514 by JonF, posted 09-14-2009 7:03 PM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 524 by JonF, posted 09-16-2009 2:05 PM ICANT has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 521 of 687 (524412)
09-16-2009 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 516 by Izanagi
09-16-2009 7:11 AM


Re:Life
Hi Izanaqi,
Welcome to EvC.
Izanaqi writes:
I would like a clarification from ICANT. I think I'm beginning to see what your argument for life is and why specifically you believe you can't create something from nothing and why it is easier for you to believe something is eternal.
Life can only be produced by life. This is proved 264 times a minute by humans alone with each birth of a child.
Science for the past 150 years have been trying to produce life under the best of conditions with the best of everything available.
Not one life form has been produced.
But I am told I must believe it happened because we are here life exists.
The Bible says God breathed life into a form and that form became a living being.
So I do have a choice.
I can believe that life produced life. Or I can believe life came from an absence of life.
Since it is a scientific fact life produces life and that non life can not produce life the choice is a no brainer for me.
Science proves the existence of a life form that gave life to all that there is.
That life form would have to be eternal existence itself.
Or we would have an infinite number of life forms that produced life.
But it makes no difference where there was one or an infinite number science has proved there was at least one.
I choose to call that life form God
He did give some men information concerning Himself and told them to write it in a book.
We have such a book called the Bible.
Izanaqi writes:
but allowing life to come from non-life means, in your mind, allowing evolution a backdoor to legitimacy (even though evolution says nothing about how life came to be),
Evolution has to have life existing to be able to evolve.
If the God of Genesis created life as He says then evolution can not be true. Mankind was created as full grown adults Gen 2:7.
Trees were made to grow out of the ground. Gen 2:9
Man was told he could eat fruit from all the trees but one. Gen 2:16, 17.
Full grown creatures were formed from the ground. Gen 2:19.
The first man named all these creatures. Gen 2:29
Creation by God and evolution are not compatable. You can't mix them.
Izanaqi writes:
you must believe that God is eternal. Have I got that right?
God is eternal existence. He told Moses tell them "I AM" sent me.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 516 by Izanagi, posted 09-16-2009 7:11 AM Izanagi has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 528 by Izanagi, posted 09-16-2009 10:08 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 522 of 687 (524413)
09-16-2009 11:26 AM
Reply to: Message 519 by ICANT
09-16-2009 10:34 AM


Re: Re Light
You lost me there.
We are travelling side by side at the same speed. 99.9% of the speed of light.
You turn on your headlights.
We measure the distance the photons travel and the time it takes for them to travel that distance.
We calculate the speed that the photons are moving away from us.
That speed is the speed of light.
Agreed?
Will that light catch up to me or will I remain in darkness forever?
The light won't catch up to you.
Edited by Modulous, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 519 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 10:34 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 523 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 12:16 PM Modulous has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.6


Message 523 of 687 (524422)
09-16-2009 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 522 by Modulous
09-16-2009 11:26 AM


Re Light
Hi Mod,
Modulous writes:
The light won't catch up to you.
I didn't think it would.
Modulous writes:
We are travelling side by side at the same speed. 99.9% of the speed of light.
You turn on your headlights.
We measure the distance the photons travel and the time it takes for them to travel that distance.
We calculate the speed that the photons are moving away from us.
That speed is the speed of light.
Agreed?
Not in agreement yet.
Lets speed up that other 0.1% so we are traveling at the speed of light. I then turn on my headlight as I am traveling at the speed of light I am keeping up with the photons so they can't even get out of the headlight.
So what are we going to measure?
If it can't catch me from behind it can't run off and leave me if I create it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 522 by Modulous, posted 09-16-2009 11:26 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 525 by JonF, posted 09-16-2009 2:07 PM ICANT has not replied
 Message 526 by Straggler, posted 09-16-2009 3:06 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 527 by Modulous, posted 09-16-2009 6:56 PM ICANT has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 188 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 524 of 687 (524436)
09-16-2009 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 520 by ICANT
09-16-2009 10:35 AM


Re: Time changes
So what causes those distortions?
Interesting question. AFAIK we don't know the answer yet.
But whether or not we know the answer, spacetime is an aspect of the universe that exists and can be measured objectively. Time exists independent of Man's definitions, and runs at different rates depending on the state of the observer and the observed.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 10:35 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 533 by ICANT, posted 09-17-2009 10:59 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 188 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 525 of 687 (524437)
09-16-2009 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 523 by ICANT
09-16-2009 12:16 PM


Re: Re Light
Lets speed up that other 0.1% so we are traveling at the speed of light.
You don't get to travel at the speed of light. You can't speed up that 0.1%. You can speed up almost to it, but you cannot ever reach it no matter what kind of spaceship you envision.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 523 by ICANT, posted 09-16-2009 12:16 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024