Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,757 Year: 4,014/9,624 Month: 885/974 Week: 212/286 Day: 19/109 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How creationism explains the Archaeopteryx
pandion
Member (Idle past 3026 days)
Posts: 166
From: Houston
Joined: 04-06-2009


Message 7 of 10 (524677)
09-18-2009 3:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ApostateAbe
09-17-2009 8:33 PM


ApostateAbe writes:
thick bones
Sorry. This is incorrect. While it cannot be determined if there were or were not air sacs as in modern birds, the bones of Archaeopteryx were hollow. I refer you to "Taking Wing" by Pat Shipman.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by ApostateAbe, posted 09-17-2009 8:33 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
pandion
Member (Idle past 3026 days)
Posts: 166
From: Houston
Joined: 04-06-2009


Message 10 of 10 (524810)
09-19-2009 2:34 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by ApostateAbe
09-18-2009 12:19 PM


The more complete reference:
Pat Shipman. 1998. Taking Wing: Archaeopteryx and the Evolution of Bird Flight. Touchstone. New York. 336 p.
There is also:
Gregory S. Paul. 2002. Dinosaurs Of The Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. 460 p.
While the latter book present a quite different view of the origin of bird flight, is still makes it clear that Archaeopteryx had hollow, possibly pneumatic, bones.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by ApostateAbe, posted 09-18-2009 12:19 PM ApostateAbe has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024