|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: EVOLUTION'S FRAUD HAS CONTRIBUTED TO ITS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE: | |||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
Thanks for clearing that up Archy, you just called a skull from a Homo Sapiens (Skull N) an "apeskull". So, you agree that modern humans are apes. Thanks, that should take some confusion away. For example, ApostateAbe offers up this series of ape skulls from T.O. and attempts to pass them off as different evolutionary steps of what became we human beings:
(And then, after the picture) The assumption is ridiculous as all they have in support that these skulls represent evolutionary ancestors at all are the skulls themselves. But no evidence that these aren't just examples of extinct Apes? I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
Hey, you're the one that said humans are apes. Don't remember? Read your own Message 31 again, where you call all skulls in the picture (including a modern human skull, skull N.) "APEskulls" So let me repeat it for you. I am above all other primates/lower animals on Earth. Maybe the reason why you and I can't relate to each other or understand each other is because "YOU" are directly related to apes, but I am NOT!!! I am a human being who was created in my father Gods image, by Him, for fellowship, and I am NOT the result of evolution from lower animals. So stop attempting to define me with your degrading and offensive perspective that human beings are just more complex animals, because I am much more than that with my personal awareness of MY Heavenly Father/Creator/God as well as my ability and desire to fellowship with Him. Degrade yourself and your proper place in this world if you like, but don't place me in that degrading box with you. So, according to your very own words, humans are APES. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
ApostateAbe writes:
That's his normal posting style. I'm sure he's glad you like it. RAZD, good Lord. Did you get permission from your publisher to put a copy of your book on the Internet? I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
Then why in Message 1 did you say they are:
No one has any actual or absolute evidence at all that neanderthal's are anything more than lower animals which is precisely what they were. Archangel in message 1 writes: (emphasis mine) Still synonymous with brutishness, the first Neanderthal remains were found in France in 1908. Considered to be ignorant, ape-like, stooped and knuckle-dragging, much of the evidence now suggests that Neanderthal was just as human as us, and his stooped appearance was because of arthritis and rickets. What is it Archy? Just as human as us, or lower animals? Pick something and admit that you were wrong on one account. I think the fact that you're not answering these questions says enough. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
So, you were posting something you know wasn't true. That's called lying. Also, you were lying to further your cause, that's very disingenuous of you. But thanks for letting everybody know you are willing to lie to further your cause. As is quite obvious to any reasonable observer, I wasn't posting that info for the truth of it in any way, but was posting it as evidence of the ludicrous claims this fraudulent science continues to make regarding the status of these bones of extinct primates which this pseudo science wants to now define as being relatives/close relatives of ours. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
I know this is off topic here, but this is just plain wrong Archy. Planck time wasn't before the big bang, it was between T=0 (the actual "big bang", which occurred to current understanding about 14.5 billion years ago) and T=10-43.
To be specific, Planck's time was prior to this alleged big bang some theorized occurred 14.5 billion years ago according to cosmological estimates, which actually place it somewhere between 10 and 20 billion years ago. That's quite a margin of error range for such a precise science, don't you think?
It would be if it were true. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
I'm glad you finally say you're not interested in science Archy, for this:
Archangel writes:
Is of course the classic case of assuming the conclusion before studying the facts. Genesis must be true, that is your conclusion. Whatever contradicts that, must be false. That's not "true" science, that's pseudo-science. IF EVOLUTION WAS A TRUE SCIENCE THAT WAS TRULY SUPPORTED BY SCIENTIFIC FACT, THEN IT WOULDN'T CONFLICT WITH THE GENESIS ACCOUNT. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
No, they weren't. NG is a popular science magazine, and is not, I repeat, NOT peer reviewed.
WHICH THIS ALLEGED EVIDENCE OF THE "Archaeoraptor" WAS. AS WERE ALL OF THE OTHER FRAUDS I HAVE DISCUSSED HERE WERE PEER REVIEWED AND RUBBER STAMPED FROM WITHIN THE EVOLUTION COMMUNITY. "Archaeoraptor" is actually being defended by evolutionists on other threads in this very forum as we speak.
So, you don't know the difference between archaeopterix and archeoraptor. Yet you're supposed to know better than the rest of us....Right....
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
Since this is not true, not really, no.
I mean, have you no problem with 50 million year old fossils being found with large portions of their soft tissue still intact as I show in post #180? Will every post you all write be rife with denials and excuses rather than actual evidence which deals with the facts regarding these many frauds which define this pseudo science?
If you would actually post some, perhaps... I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Arphy writes:
So you're saying Neadrthals were more huamn like than ape like, yes? Same with Neanderthal man. The image of an ape-ish looking person i would say is still in the public mind. Despite scientists refuting this image of neanderthals this has not had a big impact on the public impression of neanderthals. I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
dokukaeru writes:
This I can answer fairly confidently. No, he's from another forum where others who post here are also posting. (4fomrus I believe). I posted there myself for some time, and Archy basically posts the same way there as he has over here. But since the moderation there isn't nearly as strict as it is here, I left there, since there's no point when no one is forced to stay on topic or to debate in good faith. One last thing: Is your posting here on EVC in any way related to a class you may be taking? I hunt for the truth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2322 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Archangel writes:
I'm assuming you have evidence for this claim? So, provide evidence that this was drawn by a paleontologist, or retract your claim. You are being dishonest again RAZD. No journalist sat down and came up with this rendition on his word processor and published it for public consumption. It was created by some paleontologist based on the actual bones from available specimens and released to the media for public consumption. I hunt for the truth I am the one Orgasmatron, the outstretched grasping handMy image is of agony, my servants rape the land Obsequious and arrogant, clandestine and vain Two thousand years of misery, of torture in my name Hypocrisy made paramount, paranoia the law My name is called religion, sadistic, sacred whore. -Lyrics by Lemmy Kilmister of Motorhead
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024