|
Author
|
Topic: EVOLUTION'S FRAUD HAS CONTRIBUTED TO ITS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE:
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
Message 4 of 323 (524629)
09-17-2009 10:12 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by Archangel
09-17-2009 9:27 PM
|
|
from your link writes: Human Ancestor Fraud - Creationist Links * A Human Ancestor Fraud * Deceptive Fossil Interpretations of Evolutionists from the Muslim online book Evolution Deceit * Features of Piltdown Skull "Deliberate Fakes" * Human Evolution - Frauds and Mistakes * Lucy's Fraudulent Fame * Orce man hominid fraud * Piltdown man fraud * The Ape-men fallacy by Malcolm Bowden (Review of book - Ape-men: Fact or Fallacy?) * The Face that Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution The following is a transcript of The Apemen Frauds portion of the audio tape. * The Piltdown Man Fraud by Monty White * The Story of the Piltdown Man by the Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia * The Yale DNA Hybridization Scandal - A UC Berkely professor reports on the intentional alteration of hybridization data which was used to support the theory that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees. What do you expect from creo sites. More gibberish. For example Piltdown man was a fraud, yes, but it was science that discovered the fraud not your creo buddies. Nebraska man was an honest mistake, again, corrected by science. The point is fraud exists in all fields including your creos. Several mistakes and fraudulent points does not make evolution any less robust.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by Archangel, posted 09-17-2009 9:27 PM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 46 of 323 (524766)
09-18-2009 1:35 PM
|
Reply to: Message 31 by Archangel
09-18-2009 8:29 AM
|
|
Can Abe actually say that these APE skulls even belong to the same family/genus of Ape? There is no genus of apes. Apes occur in a number of Genera, such as Pan, Gorilla & Homo. You, I & everyone else on this forum is an ape.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 31 by Archangel, posted 09-18-2009 8:29 AM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 57 of 323 (524823)
09-19-2009 8:48 AM
|
Reply to: Message 55 by Archangel
09-19-2009 7:13 AM
|
|
NO AA, an Ape is a big monkey which was created by God will all of the other lower animals. Wrong, an ape is not a monkey. There are 2 types of monkeys, new world that have prehensile tails & old world which have non-prehensile tails. Apes on the other hand are tailless. And stop saying that humans are above all other creatures that is an archaic idea st forth by men several thousand years ago. HUMANS are APES.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 55 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 7:13 AM | | Archangel has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 58 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 9:09 AM | | bluescat48 has replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 67 of 323 (524837)
09-19-2009 1:48 PM
|
Reply to: Message 58 by Archangel
09-19-2009 9:09 AM
|
|
SORRY my friend, but you are deluded if you actually believe that humans are related to Apes in any real or specific way at all. I reject that definition of who and what we are and refuse to apply it to my human origins no matter how many times you attempt to affiliate me with being related to lower animals. No, you are the deluded one. You have been brainwashed by fundie creotards who have egos as big as the Andromeda galaxy. As I said this is a belief that started with bronze aged men who pictured themselves above everything. When they couldn't come up with an explanation of the earth, universe et cetera, they invented gods to explain it.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 58 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 9:09 AM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 75 of 323 (524899)
09-19-2009 11:06 PM
|
Reply to: Message 72 by Archangel
09-19-2009 9:09 PM
|
|
Re: Neanderthals are apes?
No LM, it isn't a fact in any way other than through your evolutionist interpretation of a bunch of old bones. No one has any actual or absolute evidence at all that neanderthal's are anything more than lower animals which is precisely what they were. Your evidence please that Neanderthals are "lower animals," whatever that means. Neanderthals are of the genus homo the same genus as you, I and all other humans living today.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 72 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 9:09 PM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 76 of 323 (524900)
09-19-2009 11:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 74 by Archangel
09-19-2009 10:20 PM
|
|
Re: Neanderthals are apes!!!
The following statement
people who had everything to gain and nothing to lose for proposing such preposterous back stories is just what creationists do. Their stories are extremely preposterous. A world wide flood caused all the fossils and the grand canyon etc. Edited by bluescat48, : typoooos
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 74 by Archangel, posted 09-19-2009 10:20 PM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 91 of 323 (524926)
09-20-2009 9:24 AM
|
Reply to: Message 89 by Archangel
09-20-2009 8:54 AM
|
|
Re: Neanderthals are apes!!!
Apple didn't spend millions upon millions of dollars in initial production costs without knowing that the science which went into the design of my Macbook is tested, proven science and reliable technology. If your hypothesis is correct, then apple should stop trying to improve the Macbook because it has been proven to be the best so it doesn't have to be modified, altered, rebuilt, redesigned etc. No matter what occurs in any scientific endeavor, there is always chances that something is missing, which is why all scientific theories are tentative and subject to change if better data is obtained.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 89 by Archangel, posted 09-20-2009 8:54 AM | | Archangel has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 92 by Archangel, posted 09-20-2009 9:40 AM | | bluescat48 has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 166 of 323 (525332)
09-23-2009 12:10 AM
|
Reply to: Message 165 by Archangel
09-23-2009 12:01 AM
|
|
Re: Holy Mary mother of god in a sidecar with chocolate jimmies and a lobster bib!
But wont you and all of your secular humanist defenders of evolution be sorely and sadly shocked on that final day when you inevitably learn how right we were and how absolutely wrong you were as you believed evolutions lies just as I am warning you about. How do you know you are right? Your myths don't hold water, stories told by bronze age men who knew nothing about the earth, man, the sun, the universe, weather, etc. How shocked will you be when at the end......nothing Edited by bluescat48, : typuo
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 165 by Archangel, posted 09-23-2009 12:01 AM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
|
|
Message 209 of 323 (525622)
09-24-2009 12:15 AM
|
Reply to: Message 207 by Archangel
09-24-2009 12:03 AM
|
|
1) Why is it that creationists deny reality in favor of mythical and fraudulent assumptions which are impossible to support with real evidence? 2) Why are creationists so insecure about what they believe that they must travel in packs like wild wolves and personally attack the opposition rather than directly debate the many inconsistencies in their pseudo scientific belief system? 3) Why do creationists cherry pick what they will respond to while ignoring everything they can't refute, as if it was never raised as an issue? You put the wrong word in your statements 1 through 3. Your statements are what the creos do. The same with statement # 5 as for statement 4, the origin of life has nothing to do with evolution, but you creos continuosly attempt to use this in regards to evolution. Evolution & Abiogenesis are two different disciplines.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 207 by Archangel, posted 09-24-2009 12:03 AM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
Re: In rebuttal to false claims of submitting evidence by evos.
Archangel writes: The only real skill your cult possesses is that of great imaginations and creative fiction writers. Again your quote does not apply to evos but the the book of Genesis, creative fiction writers. As for responding, you started the topic, you claim fraud so it is up to you to give the evidence of fraud, which in your creobabble & creowebsites, have not.
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969 Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 258 by Archangel, posted 09-25-2009 9:32 AM | | Archangel has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2