Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Recent paper with an ID spin? Abel and Trevors (2005).
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2131 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 76 of 85 (525208)
09-22-2009 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Smooth Operator
09-20-2009 3:14 PM


Creationist positions (again)
Smoothie, you're giving yourself away.
First you adamantly claimed that your belief in geocentrism was not related to religious belief but to science.
Now you are arguing for the creationist position on CSI. And you'll probably try to tell us that that idea is based on science as well.
Why is it that your "science" always seems to support the straight creationist belief system, and is dismissed by about 99.9% of scientists?
(Sounds a lot like creation "science" to me.)

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Smooth Operator, posted 09-20-2009 3:14 PM Smooth Operator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Smooth Operator, posted 09-23-2009 11:34 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024