EVOLUTION'S FRAUD HAS CONTRIBUTED TO ITS PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE:

Archangel, It's not our fault you can't support your claims. If you made a claim you couldn't support, then shame on you. Stop getting shitty with everyone else because you can't show the deliberate deception that you alleged in the examples you gave.Who committed fraud? How? In exactly what way were they dishonest? Put up or shut up. This grows tedious.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

Hi Angel,Still blaming everyone else for your problems eh? Classy. I have cohorts! Great! I've always wanted cohorts! Next I'm gonna get me some goons. Cohorts are all very well but they don't have the personal touch you only get with hired goons... Thanks. Right back atcha big fella. Actually I haven't. I really haven't. I'm just going on a hunch. I'm a cultist too now? Great! First the cultist cohorts, then the goons, then... henchmen.Remember, tinfoil hat shiny-side-out. In all seriousness Angel, I'm only asking that you back up your claims. I think I've been pretty patient with you in doing so. Never mind though, since I think I have my answers;Do you have any evidence that Orce Man is cited as prima facie evidence for evolution?No you don't.Do you have any evidence that Orce Man was a deliberate fraud?No you don't.Why not?Because everybody else is out to get you. Apparently.Well, boo-hoo.Any time you want to actually substantiate your claims kid, I'll be here. Until then, you are welcome to continue your descent into conspiracy theory lunacy. Keep it up. You are doing a far better job of making creationism look stupid than I ever could.Mutate and Survive

---

"A curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understands it." - Jacques Monod

As usual, attempting to reason with an evolutionist is a wasted! effort. See ya...

If you would have presented empirical evidence you would possibly have fared better.What you gave us was belief unsupported by empirical evidence.And belief without belief is simply empty.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Bull pucky! I fared just fine even though I was outnumbered at better than 10 to 1. And here's my empirical evidence of that!Participants No.
Posts Member's
Posts
Archangel 45 Archangel Posts Only
Dr Adequate 27 Dr Adequate Posts Only
Coyote 18 Coyote Posts Only
Peepul 12 Peepul Posts Only
Percy 12 Percy Posts Only
ApostateAbe 10 ApostateAbe Posts Only
Huntard 10 Huntard Posts Only
bluescat48 9 bluescat48 Posts Only
dokukaeru 9 dokukaeru Posts Only
Coragyps 8 Coragyps Posts Only
Granny Magda 8 Granny Magda Posts Only
RAZD 8 RAZD Posts Only
obvious Child 7 obvious Child Posts Only
AdminNosy 6 AdminNosy Posts Only
greyseal 6 greyseal Posts Only
Admin 5 Admin Posts Only
Bluejay 5 Bluejay Posts Only
hooah212002 5 hooah212002 Posts Only
Modulous 4 Modulous Posts Only
PaulK 4 PaulK Posts Only
Tanndarr 4 Tanndarr Posts Only
Adminnemooseus 3 Adminnemooseus Posts Only
Hyroglyphx 3 Hyroglyphx Posts Only
Lithodid-Man 3 Lithodid-Man Posts Only
Arphy 2 Arphy Posts Only
AdminAsgara 1 AdminAsgara Posts Only
caffeine 1 caffeine Posts Only
cavediver 1 cavediver Posts Only
dwise1 1 dwise1 Posts Only
jacortina 1 jacortina Posts Only
JonF 1 JonF Posts Only
Malcolm 1 Malcolm Posts Only
mark24 1 mark24 Posts Only
Parasomnium 1 Parasomnium Posts Only
slevesque 1 slevesque Posts Only
Son 1 Son Posts Only
tuffers 1 tuffers Posts OnlyBut tell me, what empirical evidence did any of you present? Absolutely none. All you ever offer are subjective interpretations of observations which are based on massive assumptions founded in preconceived conclusions which is all that your pseudo science is based upon. So don't be claiming any undeserved victories here my lost and deluded friend. Especially since all you did was sit back and heckle throughout this fiasco, as most of your buddies did. What I gave you were dozens of questions based on deductive reasoning which not one of you could answer so you resorted to the tactic of claiming I didn't support my arguments with empirical evidence. The fact is Coyote, I made no claims at all regarding how life began other than stating my beliefs in passing. What I did was ask you to prove the basic foundation upon which evolution is founded. And that request alone has brought the lot of you down on me in your irrational tirades, rants and personal attacks on me since you are completely incapable of defending that which you claim is a legitimate science.And WHY IS THAT? Because you know you can't answer any of the challenges I put to the philosophical cowards that evolutionists, secular humanists and atheists are. Is this statement supposed to make sense in the real world regarding anything I have said? Because it only makes sense to me in context of what you claim to be factually true regarding the cult of your religion. Edited by Archangel, : No reason given.

Well, you've very nearly figured out our little secret, so I guess it's only fair to tell you the rest.Yes, we control the internet. It's a big job, but someone has to do it.But you have erred in your guess at what we do with this power. What we actually do ... promise you won't tell anyone? ... is we use it to delete all the good creationist arguments, leaving only the ones that are palpable nonsense. By these subtle means, we hope to give everyone the impression that creationists are a bunch of ding-dongs.And that is why all the creationist arguments on the internet are unsupported by the evidence. It's not that we remove all the evidence supporting creationist arguments --- instead, we remove all the creationist arguments supported by evidence, leaving only the creationist arguments that are blithering nonsense. Cunning, eh?So, for example, the only reason our all-powerful cabal allowed you to read the gibberish you quoted in your OP was that it's clearly garbage of the rankest and most stinky variety. You will never get to see any of the good creationist arguments, because the only surviving copies of these are kept in a secure vault at World Evolutionist Headquarters. (I'm not allowed to tell you where that is, let's just say it's an underwater volcano in an "undisclosed location".)Of course, sometimes some smartass creationist will persist in posting a valid argument even after we've deleted it a few times. Then we have to send goons round to his house to have him whacked. Fortunately we have lots of goons. Evolutionism is a big cult, and, as you know, we're all thoroughly wicked, and always up for a bit of murder if that'll conceal The Truth. Or, indeed, just for the heck of it.Don't worry, though --- I think we can guarantee your safety. You are presenting exactly the image of creationism that we wish the world to see.Well, I must go now. I have truths to suppress, goats to sacrifice, and the paperwork just keeps on piling up. I've asked and asked for more minions, but sometimes I think the Budget Department are even more steeped in evil than the rest of us put together.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Treacherous dog! No minions for you. You have said too much!A team of crack evil-utionist ninjas, led by Grand Dragon Richard Dawkins himself, has been dispatched to your location.Your bones will be used to create fraudulent hominid fossils.Mutate and Survive

---

"A curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understands it." - Jacques Monod

I would like to thank Archangel for opening and maintaining a thoughtfull, spirited and enlightening thread and for diplaying his/her patience with grace, humility and humor. I would also like to thank him/her for the well sculpted reasoning of his/her arguments and the intellectually stimulating responses given to every critique.But I can do neither.Typical.I think this thread has run it's course. Time to lurk elsewhere.Edited by AZPaul3, : fat fingers

Oh great, the evil-utionist ninjas.... last time they came around they left my house in a mess, littering it with "fossils" and Budweiser bottles. Not to mention that Dawkins guy who spent most of the evening barking like a dog and going on and on about "memes".Paranoid delusion can be fun.(PS hiya Granny Magda. Glad to see you still so fervently fighting for the cause of truth and reason over superstition!)Edited by Briterican, : (had to say hi to granny)

Hey Briterican! The sad thing about this thread is that Archangel's behaviour is not unusual. I've seen it before in other creationists. The scam is to post something contentious, brag and be rude to everyone, ignore any posts that address the topic in a reasoned or polite fashion and reply only to the jokes, snipes and put-downs.That way, the creo can go "See? They're picking on me! The evil-utionists are mean! Thus, I declare creation true, this debate over and myself the winner."Now, to you and me, that may seem like a poor substitute for reasoned debate...Now, off to the MMORGs and role playing discussion. thread with you, to tell everyone how bloody brilliant my D&D campaign is! Mutate and Survive

---

"A curious aspect of the theory of evolution is that everybody thinks he understands it." - Jacques Monod

Closing in about 15 minutes.Adminnemooseus

It's not so much the topic dying, as a pet topic being put down. It's a tired old topic, it's in pain and suffering, it doesn't so much live as twitch occasionally and whine ... it's kindest that it should die.

Adminnemooseus and I have not had a chance to discuss whether or not this thread should be closed, so I'm reopening it in the meantime.Please keep discussion focused on the topic of discussion. Specifically, do not complain about treatment by other participants in this thread.This is the thread for reporting problems with discussion: Report discussion problems here: No.2. Before reporting a problem I suggest making very sure your own behavior has been above reproach.

---

--	Percy
	EvC Forum Director

If it's closing time, I would like to reference Message 64 which answers all the false assertions of the website that Archangel copied and pastes, and which Archangel has not responded to.This post falsifies his position, but he has not seen fit to even try to rebut the evidence that I've presented, content instead to deny that it is evidence and snipe from the sidelines.This is sufficient to show that he has no argument AND no rebuttal.Enjoy.Edited by RAZD, : clrty

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

---

• • • Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click) • • •

Hello Archangel!
Glad to see you are still posting.Do you consider yourself an honest person?If you do, how can you post things like this: You realize that this thread will be viewable for a very long time. You can come back here years later and review it.
You realize God can see in your heart and in this thread.You have been presented with massive amounts of rebuttals containing all sorts of honest evidence, yet you continue to assert the opposite.
I again beg you to look over this and be truely honest with yourself. Answer those rebuttals, post your definitions of science and evolutionI know that some members have treated you somewhat harshly, but you must understand that there are probably dozens of identical topics like this one on this forum and elsewhere. These members have become jaded and callous to your arguements because they have heard every claim you have made, rebutted them only to have the participant do exactly what you have done. Sometimes when I am bored, I go through and look at some of the older topics to see what kind of stuff was discussed there.I have tried not to do this to you. I am fairly new to discussions/debates like this one, but i am quickly realizing what the more experienced members have already learned.If you feel you are being outnumbered, it is possible to have this discussion with only 1 or 2 people to respond to. I would really like to see you stick around One last thing: Is your posting here on EVC in any way related to a class you may be taking?Thanks,
Joe