Do fossils disprove evolution?

Let me guess. The "plan" that was "developed" was done by a computer correct?

I'm not even close to being wrong pal. You are the one trying to take the focus off the issue by bringing up the definition of kind. Its all part of the Darwinist trick. Lets blurr the definition of kind so we can avoid the issue.

You already made my point for me when you said "they did it".
I have to run for now, bye

One thing before I go. (Oh, and thanks for the friendly debate)
I was just wondering what that antenna had to do with new information
to the Genome. The answer is nothing. Absolutly nothing. Just another mirror in the house of tricks.

What evidence are you refering to? Please tell me it was that antenna so I can fall asleep tonight laughing.

Thanks for the link. What I see is a great innovation created by the most brilliant minds in the world. It does nothing to provide answers
as to where information came from for the Theory of Evolution model.
To say that antenna came from natural causes with no help from an intelligent source is horse crap of the highest order.

Thats not new information from a blind non-thinking source. It was brought to fruition by a team of the most brilliant minds in the world. Its just like Dawkins thinking he simulated evolution on a man-made computer. You people are patheticly desperate. The knees of Darwinism are wobbling and its only a matter of time before the hand of truth is going to slap you down!Good night, and may God's loving hand of mercy open your eyes of understanding before its too late for you.
ICDESIGN everywhere I look

I was looking at how much time you spend trying to defend evolution
and I can't help but wonder what kind of look you will have on your face when you are standing before Almighty God.Variation within a kind is all part of the design. A dog has been and always will be a dog. All you have to do is look around you Doc. Everything is after its own kind just as God commanded it to be.The bottom line problem you Darwinist's have is where did the information come from? When you can come up with a proven solution
to that problem, get back to me.

Its a proven fact that most mutations are either harmful or neutral,
first of all. To say mutations produce any kind of significant new information is a lie.
The original question was however: Where did information first come from? Everything you Darwinist's believe requires a miracle to have taken place. But hey, all you have to do is add massive time to the equation and "poof", trillions of miracles happened one after another.
No problem right?Edited by ICDESIGN, : No reason given.Edited by ICDESIGN, : No reason given.

Off topic Material Hidden
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

Any animal that breeds with another is of the same kind. I don't care what you and your like minded buddies claim.
and message 91 is for you too.

Off topic Material Hidden
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

Off topic Material Hidden
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

Off topic Material Hidden
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

Off topic Material HiddenEdited by Adminnemooseus, : Off-topic stuff.