|
Author
|
Topic: Living fossils expose evolution
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
Message 60 of 416 (527116)
09-30-2009 10:33 AM
|
Reply to: Message 53 by Calypsis4
09-30-2009 10:16 AM
|
|
Re: Living fossils expose evolution??
Dr. Werner made a prediction before his world-wide tour examining fossils that he would gather evidence of mammals in the era of the dinosaur which supposedly existed 65-70 million yrs ago. Were mammals and dinosaur contemporary? This is what he found: Why do you think this is relevant or helps your argument? Also, you have been requested numerous times to post smaller images. Could you do it? These huge images do not strengthen your point and that you do not follow suggestions just makes you seem like more of an ass. I do not need my screen overwhelmed with more of your bs, when I am expecting a clear argument. Thanks.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 53 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 10:16 AM | | Calypsis4 has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 66 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 10:49 AM | | Theodoric has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 120 of 416 (527199)
09-30-2009 2:17 PM
|
Reply to: Message 87 by Calypsis4
09-30-2009 11:39 AM
|
|
Re: Living fossils expose evolution??
Yes, but I do have the reference. It was from AOL pictures of tiger fossils, p. 3. not hyenas. If there was a mistake it was AOL and not I. I have not used 'Harun Yayha'. Post your source. Also, we are still waiting for the link to the site you were ridiculed at for suggesting mammals and dinosaurs coexisted. Did adults go to this website too?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 87 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 11:39 AM | | Calypsis4 has replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Magnolias, Bat, Crayfish, and Opposum
Now 120 posts in we cut to the chase.
They do not know the Engineer of living organisms nor do have they come to trust His word that He means what He says. I see you have come here to preach not actually give evidence. Well if you want to preach head over to the faith forums. Are you taking a few classes at a christian college, because most classes only require you to post 20 messages on "evolutionist" forums.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 119 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 2:03 PM | | Calypsis4 has replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Living fossils expose evolution??
It was from AOL pictures of tiger fossils, p. 3. Saying this tells me nothing. What is AOL pictures? How about providing a link so people can tell what you are talking about.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 127 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 2:51 PM | | Calypsis4 has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Magnolias, Bat, Crayfish, and Opposum
You need to stop your complaining and address the issue. The issues as I think they are understood have been addressed. YOu have been told that mamnmals existing in the age of dinosaurs is not a surprise and it certainly does nothing to undermine the TOE. Your other pics have been shown to not show what you claim they show. Also, it has been pointed out that a lot of your photos are not of what you think they are. I am still waiting for you to show us where you were attacked for suggestions mammals existed with dinosaurs. Or was that a lie?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 124 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 2:45 PM | | Calypsis4 has replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Harun Yahya Ha Ha
Evidently he must think everything he reads on the internet that agrees with his worldview is fact. It seems there is no way he will ever be convinced that it is a hyena skull no matter what the evidence. Edited by Theodoric, : spelling
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Some advice
Don't bring up things or make accusations that you cannot back up with facts. You are claiming that "evolutionists"(whatever they are) attacked you for claiming mammals existed in the time of the dinosaurs. No kidding, it isnt a newsflash about mammals. If this story about you being attacked is true(which I highly doubt, since you mysteriously can't remember who or when or where), they are wrong. The people that attacked you would be classified as idiots. That is why I am wondering if it is true if it is a site that people with any education(adults) even go to. All you have to do is watch popular science shows on TV to see that mammals were around in the age of dinosaurs. That would be a bit longer than 12 million BP though.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 142 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 3:40 PM | | Calypsis4 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 167 by NosyNed, posted 09-30-2009 4:25 PM | | Theodoric has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Harun Yahya Ha Ha
But you have yet to admit that it is not a feline skull. Will you admit that it is not a feline skull? You have a way of never admitting that anything you say or post is wrong. Do you contest the fact that it is a skull of a hyena?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 147 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 3:47 PM | | Calypsis4 has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
Re: Change in the fossil record
Funny. You didn't quote Oxnard. You quoted someone who was interpreting Oxnard. I reject your reasoning. I only touched on the many reasons to reject the so-called 'evolution of man'. Funny. You didn't quote Oxnard. You didn't even quote someone who was interpreting Oxnard. I reject you reasoning. You have no quotes from Oxnard so why should we believe your interpretation?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 187 by Calypsis4, posted 09-30-2009 5:27 PM | | Calypsis4 has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 264 of 416 (527455)
10-01-2009 12:24 PM
|
Reply to: Message 262 by slevesque
10-01-2009 11:46 AM
|
|
Re: Teenage bats ripping up the town
Something like: abnormal limb ratio+5claws instead of 2 = Transitional fossil = Evolution is true. Do you truly believe that the TOE relies on one piece of evidence? It relies on millions of pieces. Your not accepting one piece of evidence does not defeat the TOE, or even influence it in any way.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 262 by slevesque, posted 10-01-2009 11:46 AM | | slevesque has replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
Evidence? Where?
Ok maybe I missed it. I have been through this thread a few times and I have yet to see where you state why living fossils are evidence against evolution. When you are asked you just post more pictures that are refuted. Can you, in a paragraph or so, tell us why living fossils are evidence against evolution? It is a simple question. Can you give us a straightforward answer? Not more gish gallop. Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 333 by Calypsis4, posted 10-02-2009 4:23 PM | | Calypsis4 has not replied |
|
Theodoric
Member Posts: 9197 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: 08-15-2005 Member Rating: 3.2
|
|
|
Message 391 of 416 (528099)
10-04-2009 1:25 PM
|
Reply to: Message 384 by Calypsis4
10-04-2009 12:01 PM
|
|
Re: Still No Argument
No, they are not incorrect comparisons. Virtually all of them are of the same kind (although different species). The Mosaic 'kind' is closest to 'family' but does not necessarily have exactly the same boundaries as Linneaus. So there is no actual basis for how you would classify things. You can make any determination you want and do not feel you need to justify or show evidence. As far as I know there is no complete "mosaic" classification of all the species of the earth. Therefore, unless you can provide a comprehensive, hierarchical listing of species then your claims of "kind" have no legitimacy. All your claims are based on personal bias and assumptions, nothing else.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 384 by Calypsis4, posted 10-04-2009 12:01 PM | | Calypsis4 has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 394 by Calypsis4, posted 10-04-2009 1:38 PM | | Theodoric has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2