Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,807 Year: 3,064/9,624 Month: 909/1,588 Week: 92/223 Day: 3/17 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Flood, fossils, & the geologic evidence
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 377 (528883)
10-07-2009 11:18 AM


Thread Copied from Proposed New Topics Forum
Thread copied here from the The Flood, fossils, & the geologic evidence thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 3 of 377 (528885)
10-07-2009 11:18 AM


Topic Focus
The topic will focus on the flood and evidence for it. I'll try to keep a fairly close eye on it.

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 8 of 377 (528893)
10-07-2009 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by hooah212002
10-07-2009 12:14 PM


Slow Down!
Hooah,
I think you can sit back and let the discussion unfold. You've had a reasonable quota of posts here for the next few hours.
You are bringing in a distraction right now anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by hooah212002, posted 10-07-2009 12:14 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 12 of 377 (528903)
10-07-2009 12:45 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 12:35 PM


Maintaing topic focus...
If you have doubts about dating then you should be posting your explanations for the correlations found in this thread:
Message 1
In addition, you have, yet again, misread the post you are applying to.
The dating by DNA changes has nothing to do with Coyote's post. You might try actually answering the question put to you.
In fact, you are required to if you wish to continue posting in this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 12:35 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 28 of 377 (528930)
10-07-2009 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 1:56 PM


Enough of that
Calypsis4 you have given enough examples of rapid preservation after death (or even at the time of death).
You might note that no one doubts that this happens often. In fact, very frequently or we wouldn't have the specimens to examine.
So you may stop bringing that up right now! Done with. Carry on and make your point that you wish to base on that and answer issues that are raised to you.
Suspensions will start to be handed out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 1:56 PM Calypsis4 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 3:27 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 69 of 377 (528991)
10-07-2009 6:24 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 2:42 PM


Radiocarbon Dating Topic
You have already been given a good thread to take the dating issues to:
Age Correlations and An Old Earth
So do NOT mention dating here again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 2:42 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 70 of 377 (528992)
10-07-2009 6:27 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 3:51 PM


Dating
as noted:
Age Correlations and An Old Earth
Thank you.
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 3:51 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 90 of 377 (529036)
10-07-2009 10:58 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Calypsis4
10-07-2009 10:57 PM


Dating
Since dating is crucial to the arguments on both sides it might be a good idea for you to take a break here and head off to the correlations and carbon dating threads.
You should note that the C14 dating has little to do with most of your issues.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Calypsis4, posted 10-07-2009 10:57 PM Calypsis4 has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 180 of 377 (530760)
10-14-2009 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by Dr Adequate
10-14-2009 4:07 PM


Too Much Dr A 12 hours
You wasted a post. So you'll take a break for half a day.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-14-2009 4:07 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024