Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,336 Year: 3,593/9,624 Month: 464/974 Week: 77/276 Day: 5/23 Hour: 2/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Assumptions of ToE

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev123
Author Topic:   Assumptions of ToE
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 303 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006

Dr Adequate Posts Only
Message 31 of 32 (530727)
10-14-2009 4:18 PM

Slevesque --- keep going.
​
You've asked us to "hold onto our replies". Let me know when you've stopped.
Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by slevesque, posted 10-14-2009 4:59 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
slevesque
Member (Idle past 4659 days)
Posts: 1456
Joined: 05-14-2009

slevesque Posts Only
Message 32 of 32 (530737)
10-14-2009 4:59 PM 		Reply to: Message 31 by Dr Adequate
10-14-2009 4:18 PM

Yeah sorry, I added by edit that I'll stop at those two assumptions (small chanegs can accumulate to big changes) and the assumptions of the dating methods (uniformitarianism in Darwin's time, constant nuclear decay today)
​
You can post your own opinion on those two. I'll try to sum up the common objections from everyone and discuss them later on.
​
Edited by slevesque, : No reason given.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-14-2009 4:18 PM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev123
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024