Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 34/23 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Information Changes in DNA by logical Analysis
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 46 of 80 (531718)
10-19-2009 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Percy
10-19-2009 9:25 AM


If you want to know whether information is increasing or decreasing then you need to be able to quantify it
Not really. All you need to be able to do is order it from smaller to larger.
Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Percy, posted 10-19-2009 9:25 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Percy, posted 10-19-2009 2:31 PM JonF has replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 56 of 80 (531753)
10-19-2009 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Percy
10-19-2009 2:31 PM


If I gave you three containers each with different amounts of information in them, but you have no way of finding out how much information each contains, how are you going to order them?
Pretend information has weight. I can put the three containers on a board with a fulcrum in the center and find the heaviest, lightest, and in-between. But I still have no idea how much each container weighs.
All I need is a binary comparison that determines A is greater than, less than, or equal to B. I don't have to be able to assign a numeric amount to A and B to compare them.
Similarly, determining whether or not does not necessarily require evaluating or
Edited by Admin, : Latex rerendered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Percy, posted 10-19-2009 2:31 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Dr Jack, posted 10-19-2009 5:06 PM JonF has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 63 of 80 (531770)
10-19-2009 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Percy
10-19-2009 5:48 PM


Re: Weighing DNA
I was just pointing out that "you must be able to assign a numeric value to information" is not necessarily true. If there exists a way of ordering information in the manner I "weighed" the information, then you can detect an increase or lack thereof in information. I don't know of a way to do this in the real world, but I also do not know that there is [b]no[b] way to do it. My lack of imagination is not evidence.
So "you must be able to assign a numeric value to information" is not true a priori, it requires justification. Much better just to ask how to detect an increase in information, which covers all bases.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Percy, posted 10-19-2009 5:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Percy, posted 10-19-2009 8:31 PM JonF has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 189 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 77 of 80 (531906)
10-20-2009 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Percy
10-20-2009 9:37 AM


Re: Must resist fist of pedantry... failing...
I think in the absence of a proposed method we must consider as undemonstrated the claim that information can be ordered without defining how it is quantified.
Yup. And we must consider as undemonstrated that information must be quantified to order it. We don't even know if information as any particular creationist conceives it can be ordered or quantified. All we can know is that, in order to meaningfully claim that some process has or has not increased information, that information must be quantified and/or ordered.
That final step is, of course, the step that few creationists even attempt. And those that do attempt it unfailingly end up with someone else demonstrating a process that does increase that particular creationist's version of information.
My only real point here is that "you must quantify information in order to claim it has or has not increased" is not true. "You must quantify or order information in order to claim it has or has not increased" is true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Percy, posted 10-20-2009 9:37 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Percy, posted 10-21-2009 8:39 AM JonF has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024