I have the impression this thread was done just for me
What on Earth would give you that idea?
Actually, triggered by your use of information maybe but since it keeps coming up we might as well have a focus for it.
But, as I've asked on the other thread: Who has read Gitt's book on information ?
I can officially say I haven't, but anyone willing to discuss this will have to answer this question.
Why worry about that yet? Let's have a look at the argument put forward here as it is very simple. From that we might arrive at things we'd want to see in Gitt's argument.
For example: if Gitt's views mean anything either the argument put forward from the 3 axioms here is wrong (which we can determine without reference to Gitt) or Gitt disagrees with one of the three axioms.
How about we review this argument first to see if it is wrong on it's own or not? Then, only if needed, we can go to Gitt to see what he says.