Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection

Small and fast. Big or tiny. Makes no difference. There is only one way to the truth and Isaac Newton, nearly 400 years ago, never scratched the surface of it

Have you ever thought about why you exist Thicky

YOU ARE LYING IN THE IRAQUI DESERT. YOUR BALLS ARE SHOT AWAY AND YOU ARE HOLDING ON TO YOUR WET SLIPPERY INTESTINES.YOU SAY PLEASE HELP ME IN THE NAME OF THE SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS. THERE IS NO HELP. 50 MILLION HAVE PERISHED THIS CENTURY FOR THIS MADNESS.HELP YOURSELF. THE BUSH BLAIR ALLIANCE IS BASED ON POLITICAL AND SCIENTIFIC IGNORANCE.I BOUGHT THE COMPUTER TO POST THE MESSAGE. I HAVE NO WISH TO INSULT YOU. I NEED YOUR HELP. 50 MILLION OTHER PEOPLE ALSO LOOK TO YOU.LETS GO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The system tells me that only you can delete this message

Okay, Thank you.

I would like to return to this thread because there are two new developments. The first is new diagram 9-1 at http://www.thewebspert.com/cresswell/. Inarguable proof that the first law of thermodynamics and the Conservation of Energy is not recognised by Nature.A design drawing, costs and component specifications are available for a tried and tested PM power torque drive. When it is giffed it will head the site.There are no charges or costs. No rip off. I will e-mail an attachment. Just ask.

When I use the word 'inarguable', I mean that the application of common sense will destroy all unprovable laws of faith and all such laws are unprovable. That is why they are called 'laws'.There is of course an essential minimum value to 'common sense' that is essential for intelligent discussion on this subject and that begins at the ability to scientifically debate Dioagram 2. Since February this forum has had zero to say on this.

ENERGY is spinning mass and HEAT the power required to SPIN IT UP.
The SPINNING DOWN of this entity is Power (HEAT) output. Power needed to spin up is always lower than the Downspin collapse. Elementary friction flywheel torque loss.The maximum value of a perfect sine wave is ALWAYS root2 x the mean effective. 3 x 10^8 m/s is RMS.Newton no longer confuses me. He is wrong about everything and Aristotle aced him 2000 years earlier with P=mv. Beautiful.
I settled for the word Quantum because Diagram 2 reciprocated and gave the infamous FREE LUNCH. I also now find continuous turbine equivalent cycles so call it what you will. A name does not effect the facts.MONEY> HA! Never liked the stuff. Never met a happy rich person that could think beyond his wallet. I am 65 and disabled. Howard Hughes may be a role model for your 'everyone'. Their problem, not mine.Comments please on how I get the loony antigravity Helium temperature at the end of the text. This is really cooking with gas. Impress me.[This message has been edited by Alan Cresswell, 09-01-2003]

No. Energy of spinning flywheel = Mv^2 and WAtts not Nm.No again and that is why I took the time to put in Diagram 9-1.The rms velocity of a sine wave is 2Pikf/2 where k is the wavelength.Yes I have an inertia drive working and e-mailed it to you this morning. Have the 9-1 water fountain working too.

I have a twin brother with a doctorate in nuclear physics. He was dull company in the womb. The intervening 65 years have not increased his intellectual powers either. Like you he was a 'what to think man'.
He could never handle the 'why' and 'how' of it.

I did not e-mail the design drawing to you. I did not consider that you would be capable of handling a mechanical engineering mechanism.
It was a judgement made by viewing your thread history.

This is most unfair of you. I dare not attack a Sunday School Teacher from the US of A. I might incur the wrath of your God and he would throw heebie jeebie devils into my design DRAWINGS.

It is driving me nuts but I do not know how to use the 'quote' function.Your red light question is a cracker. It will take me the rest of the day to rephrase and get back to you on this. Can you send me an excellent spectrum source diagram. As good as the data you have.I have a feeling that a colour examination will show known shift profiles to be C aether carrier wave, plus or minus the light velocity that is dumped upon it.If I do not get back today it means I have jumped in where I never intended to go.

I have just seen my mistake. I have used WAVELENGTH as an AMPLITUDE.Of course measured C = f x lambda always but this value shifts about 3 x 10^8 m/s.

It is I who should apologise. I did send it. I clicked the wrong mail button and never checked the heading. Sorry about that but no harm done, since you never open attachments.