I would also like to add the following.
Some creationists think evolutionists also use the childish "what-if" as evidence.
In science, a hypothesis is made and tangible evidence will either confirm or disprove it. But creationists think like children. They come up with what-if scenarios and then try to use them as evidence. The most obvious examples are all the myriad of what-if "evidence" they come up with to try to prove noah's flood. Everything from insects surviving on floating mats of vegetation to the hydro-plate theory is used to prove the flood even though they're all what-ifs. Creationists don't understand that using a what-if scenario ain't evidence.