Alan Cresswell writes:
Einstein was an inexperienced patent office clerk with delusions of grandeur.
Of course! How could we not have seen this? Einstein wasn't even capable of inventing perpetual motion machines, after all.
Alan Cresswell writes:
He never asked how and why light existed. His relativity delivers mathematical absurdities which physicists disguise as erudite singularities.
What do you mean "how and why light existed"? I mean, "how"? How many ways are there for light to exist? What kind of question is that? And "why"? Since when is science concerned with
why things exist? There's a lot of friction between what you probably want to say and the way you say it. A bit like in your perpetual motion machines, I guess.
And perhaps you could be so kind as to fill us in on the motives of practically every physicist on the planet to disguise Einstein's alleged "mathematical absurdities"?
"Erudite singularities"? You mean like black holes that know a lot? Do you know something about the universe we don't?
Get real.
------------------
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." - Douglas N. Adams