|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Electro-mechanical engines of Perpetual Motion and Natural Selection | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
'You guess'. I like this expression. It is symptomatic of institutionalised physics.
Absurdities are not alleged by me. They are a fact admitted to by relativity practitioners. Get real. Enstein died in abject failure.If he had never been born; name one single thing the human race would be short of. University funding is not acceptable as an answer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
You seem to be getting somewhere. Yes I know a lot more about the universe than your 'WEES'.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
doctrbill Member (Idle past 2786 days) Posts: 1174 From: Eugene, Oregon, USA Joined: |
Alan Cresswell writes:
You attack Einstein and Watt and yet you fear a lowly SS officer? Very Interesting. I dare not attack a Sunday School Teacher from the US of A. I might incur the wrath of your God and he would throw heebie jeebie devils into my design DRAWINGS.
Too late to worry about that. ------------------"I was very unwilling to give up my belief." Charles Darwin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
helena  Suspended Member (Idle past 5866 days) Posts: 80 Joined: |
As there seems to be some very general confusion, I'll try to make 1 or 2 points..
(a) Attributing the idea of relativity to Einstein alone is not correct. His achievement (at least for special relativity) was taking the existing mathematical ideas and unifying the concepts (there are still Lorentz transformations around named for the person who first brought them up). On a related note, Einstein did not get his Nobel prize for the theory of relativity .... (b) Postulating a medium (ether or whatever) that electromagnetic waves need to propagate, borders on the absurd. I recommend reading about the Michelson-Morley experiments (which - I think - predate the theory of relativity by some time)... (c) All theories in physics also this theory need to invoke some postulates. Postulates in this context being statements that can not (yet) be proven THEORETICALLY (mathematically), but can only be inferred from the fact that experimental observations fit with theoretical predictions derived from the postulates... The laws of thermodynamics are NOT such postulates, but can be derived from a SINGLE postulate, which states that "in equilibrium all accessible microstates of an enclosed system are occupied with the same probability". You just have to find a system in which this is not fulfilled, otherwise the laws derived from this stand... (d) (I don't know if this has been stated) Perpetual motion machines are no problem for statistical physics (and for thermodynamics by inference), machines that run perpetually and produce energy in the process are, however, in violation of the laws of thermodynamics... best regards
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Alan Cresswell writes: I have just seen my mistake. I have used WAVELENGTH as an AMPLITUDE. Of course measured C = f x lambda always but this value shifts about 3 x 10^8 m/s. Actually, if we're talking about a vacuum, the value doesn't shift at all. The relationship of ƒλ = c always holds. I'm still trying to decipher your meaning from when you said this in Message 56:
"The SPINNING DOWN of this entity is Power (HEAT) output." You can't equate heat and power. They are two different concepts. One is energy, the other is energy per unit time. Then, of course, there's the question of how these potential errors affect your conceptual framework regarding perpetual motion. You say you have a demonstration device. Could you provide us pictures of your experimental setup, and describe how you're measuring the inputs and outputs? --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Cresswell Inactive Member |
quote:Yes, these experiments predate Relativity. What they showed was that the speed of light is not relative to some underlying static medium, nor one that flows in some way - ie: no aether. They also show that the speed of light is not relative to the source of that light (ie: not like bullets fired from a gun with a muzzle velocity). It was the results of these experiments that led Einstein to realise that the speed of light in vacuum is constant for all observers irrespective of their relative motions ... from which the Special Theory of Relativity derives. Alan
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Brad McFall Member (Idle past 5054 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: |
My physics is realatively weak compared to biology but any constancy here short of universal statements relies on a figure that can be afforded by an ellipse or a circle with any projective geometry created therefrom so what is constant is not FIXED absolutely. I dont know if this is correct as to any difference of capacity and intensity that may have been in error in this thread (if?) else true.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
I have just e-mailed the drawings to you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Percy Member Posts: 22480 From: New Hampshire Joined: Member Rating: 4.8 |
Hi Alan,
Thank you for the drawings, but what I'm more interested in is pictures of your prototype in operation, and descriptions of how you're measuring the inputs and outputs of the device. Additionally, I'm still interested in knowing how you think the problems regarding RMS of a wave and the units of heat and power impact your calculations. --Percy
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1489 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Enstein died in abject failure. If so, may we all be such failures.
If he had never been born; name one single thing the human race would be short of. Solar panels. Space travel. Oops, that's two. My bad.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2191 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: According to some people here, I'm at times unintelligent and illogical, yet even I can cut n paste. You beat me to this one, John.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Parasomnium Member Posts: 2224 Joined: |
Alan Cresswell writes: 'You guess'. I like this expression. It is symptomatic of institutionalised physics. Quoting out of context isn't going to win you any sympathy, let alone an argument.
Alan Cresswell writes: Enstein died in abject failure. If he had never been born; name one single thing the human race would be short of. Here are some things we would have had sooner or later, but which can be attributed to Einstein:
Also we can thank Einstein for the concept of the 'Gedanken experiment'. And one thing the world would certainly be without, had Einstein not been born: the element Einsteinium. --- "Two things are infinite: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."- Albert Einstein [This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 09-03-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
Your imagination belongs on another planet. There is only ONE value. It is the GPS satellite positioning correction.
However my mass relativity delivers it by common sense as opposed to the Lorentz absurdity. Thus........... Gravitational Attraction = GxM1xM2(1-v^2/C^2)/X^2. This is in the text but you clearly have reading difficulties.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Alan Cresswell Inactive Member |
The prospect of the world championship 'cutting and pasting' title is not intellectually stimulating to me. Help yourselves to it. Please do.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Parasomnium Member Posts: 2224 Joined: |
Alan Cresswell writes: The prospect of the world championship 'cutting and pasting' title is not intellectually stimulating to me. Be that as it may, it sure would be intellectually stimulating to us if you directed your replies to the right person.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024