Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,755 Year: 4,012/9,624 Month: 883/974 Week: 210/286 Day: 17/109 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   TOE and the Reasons for Doubt
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 320 of 530 (529410)
10-09-2009 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 316 by Kaichos Man
10-09-2009 12:56 AM


Gaps and Punk Eck
Darwin blamed an incomplete fossil record. Eldredge (above) categorically denies this. One of them is wrong.
No, you are wrong.
Eldredge and Gould offered and explanation for why there is an incomplete record in many cases but not all of speciation. They were not talking about transitionals between higher taxa.
You should avoid arguments fed to you by liars when you don't understand the actual biology.
Edited by NosyNed, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by Kaichos Man, posted 10-09-2009 12:56 AM Kaichos Man has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 452 of 530 (537033)
11-26-2009 10:45 AM
Reply to: Message 449 by Peg
11-26-2009 7:31 AM


Missing Parts
can the living cell survive without all its parts?
So what if it can't?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 449 by Peg, posted 11-26-2009 7:31 AM Peg has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 482 of 530 (537412)
11-28-2009 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 473 by Peg
11-28-2009 7:05 AM


Removing bits
ok so maybe you can explain which parts of the cell can be removed without causing the cell to cease functioning and reproducing.
Even if the answer is no parts can be removed without the cell function ceasing it doesn't matter.
You have fallen for the irreducible complexity trick and you don't understand what is wrong with it.
An irreducible complex thing can be created not just by adding bits one at a time it can be created by subtracting things too. With that the whole IC argument is dead.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 473 by Peg, posted 11-28-2009 7:05 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 484 by Peg, posted 11-28-2009 9:16 PM NosyNed has replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 485 of 530 (537473)
11-28-2009 9:35 PM
Reply to: Message 484 by Peg
11-28-2009 9:16 PM


Nice quote mine...
Rather that actually acknowledge the point made you actually resort to a quote mine? After all the discussion here at EvC about the dishonest use of such things in the creationist community this is the best you can do?
A perfect example, thank you for it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 484 by Peg, posted 11-28-2009 9:16 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 489 by Peg, posted 11-29-2009 4:37 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024