"Well, I think the Theory of evolution has so many basic problems to it scientifically... ...so it seems there must be a non-materialistic explanation for some things"
Oh, sorry, that disqualifies you from being able to analyze the ToE!
Yes, of course that disqualifies you - from any kind of science. If you do not think that Evolution or Natural Selection has been successfully tested and verified, if you think there are large holes in the theory, then you can and develop a new theory which explains what we see. You don't go running off, crying - see, see, we need a non-materialistic explanation. If scientists acted like that we would still be in the dark ages.
When it was noticed that the advance of perihelion of the orbit of Mercury could not be explained by Newtonian gravitation, was that the time we should have decided that "there must be a non-materialistic explanation for some things"?
When it was found that an electric current could deflect a compass, was that the time we should have decided that "there must be a non-materialistic explanation for some things"?
When it was found that radium could fog a photographic plate, was that the time we should have decided that "there must be a non-materialistic explanation for some things"?