Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Psychology Behind the Belief in Heaven and Hell
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 390 of 410 (537554)
11-29-2009 10:33 AM
Reply to: Message 388 by AdminPD
11-29-2009 6:06 AM


Re: Argue The Position, Not The Person
If you take issue with my Admin comments, then take your complaints to the "Report discussion problems" thread. Do not respond in this thread.
Thanks
AdminPD
No I have no problem with this I didnt know that was a problem, thanks for the guidance, from your rule book
EAM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 388 by AdminPD, posted 11-29-2009 6:06 AM AdminPD has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 391 of 410 (537581)
11-29-2009 1:00 PM
Reply to: Message 389 by DevilsAdvocate
11-29-2009 8:29 AM


Re: Moral Cognitive Dissonance
EAM writes:
Well, this has nothing to do with the argument I made. You have now turned the main point from whether
God has any situation, where one may lie and it not be a sin, to my weaknesses. One really has nothing to
do with the other
This is not off subject but is really relevant to the subject at hand. My point is that even though you
know that lying is a sin, an infraction against your God, you would knowingly violate it premeditatively
before hand because of some other standard. That is my point. My question is WHY would you do
so.
because I would not want to see anyone die, that did not deserve death. But in that process I would not
lose my objectivity and delude myself into believing that Gods command was NOW somehow acceptable
along with my actions. When yopu start doing this, then any action becomes justifiable in our own
minds. I MIGHT do it due to a immediate reation, I might do it because I know God would not view my
entire life in that one instance. I might do it because my emotions took over at that moment and here I
dont mean to imply I wasnt in control. In it all the LYING does NOT become a MORALLY CORRECT THING,
because I or the situation dictate it as such
Yes I understand what you are saying but you are not listening to what I am saying. My issue is not
whether or not she would be punished it is why would lying to protect another human beings life be
considered wrong at all. That is my source of contention.
You wont take NO for an answer will you. It is wrong from a Biblical perspective because God has
designated as such AND AND AND he provides no addendums to that edict. if such things exist, atleast
in the scriptures, then simply set it out.
I know you dont believe it but there are PRINCIPLES in existence, that are even more important than life
itself. To save your childs life you would give up your life. the PRINCIPLE of LOVE and giving up YOUR
LIFE, is more important than YOUR LIFE itself.
You said you believe in capital punishment in some instances. Therefore, you must believe there is a
PRINCIPLE in existence that superceeds the life of the person, being put to death. Your Arch Nemesis,
has nailed you here.
Gods commands and principles often, not always, outweigh, even the reality of physical life itself and
the keeping or sustaining of that physical life
Therefore my conclusion is that lying is morally wrong to protect a life, because Gods commands
superceed life itself. However, as I have said many times, God is not unsympathetic to situations and our
ignorance. he has and does overlook our ignorance in disobedience to his commands. This is also
another of his PRINCIPLES, but it does not mean lying is not a sin. This is not to say the sin will go
unpunished, Christ has paid that, but it is stated simply to say that he has more than one or two virtues
or principles.
"every idol thought and word will brought into judgement"
Yet if one hypothetically never sinned at all except to lie to protect the life of another human being
from harm or death, that person would be doomed for eternity in hell because of this one charitable
action. That is the point I am making. Why would this action be considered wrong i.e. a sin at all.
true, but you would have to disregard everything else the scriptures has to say about God and what has been said in this connection, by myself
Of all the confiscated and ridiculous stories I have heard in my life, this one takes the cake. In essence you are saying that we should be happy that someone was murdered in our place, in essence he murdered someone else (or himself however you want to view it) to satisfy himself, and we should all join you in heaven for never ending worship this unforgiving brutal dictator for eternity while the rest of humanity is being tortured FOR ETERNITY IN A BURNING LAKE OF FIRE.
I am sorry but I will opt out of this delusional escapade. Have fun while we burn. Maybe I should make that into a t-shirt.
My mistake I thought we were speaking from a Biblical perspective about the Biblical God and his actions from the same source. if your contention is from outside that source, I cant help you, you will and can imagine anything you wish.
By all means "OPT AWAY"
See ya.
EAM
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 389 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 11-29-2009 8:29 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 1:47 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 393 of 410 (537593)
11-29-2009 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 392 by onifre
11-29-2009 1:47 PM


Re: Moral Cognitive Dissonance
I thought Jesus was the "addendum" that cleared all sins, both past and future? I thought that made lying (or the breaking of any other commandment) not really a sin but more of a thing we had to check ourselves on.
Ill try this one more time. jesus is not an addendum to make a sin, not a sin, he has overlooked the sin through Christs action. It does NOT make the sin NOT REALLY a sin, as you suggest
Jesus does not CLEAR all sins without a response from man through belief, repentance and baptism, into his body. Its not unconditional.
Where in the Bible does it show this side of God?
Please provide verse/quote.
Quote
Ephesians 2:1-3 "and you hath he quickened, who were dead in tresspasses and sins, wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience, among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others."
See he doesnt say its not sin only that he has through his patience provided away out
EAM
EAM
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 392 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 1:47 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 395 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 2:48 PM Dawn Bertot has replied
 Message 399 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 3:08 PM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 394 of 410 (537595)
11-29-2009 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 392 by onifre
11-29-2009 1:47 PM


Re: Moral Cognitive Dissonance
Many Christians here do not agree with you, yet they claim the same religion as you. So clearly, there is more than one way to read this book. You happen to agree with your interpretation of it, wow, what a coincidence.
Who are they and let them present thier argument
In one single paragraph, you prove exactly what I was arguing for: everything is deterministic.
Even though you knew it was a sin, there were determining factors that already layed out the path for you.
And I notice you even tried to sneak in that you're not implying that you weren't in control (I dont mean to imply I wasnt in control) because you knew your entire paragraph was implying just that.
This is nonsense and I have already demonstrated why in our previous discussion. Perhaps you have already forgotten why
EAM
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 392 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 1:47 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 397 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 3:00 PM Dawn Bertot has replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 396 of 410 (537598)
11-29-2009 2:56 PM
Reply to: Message 395 by onifre
11-29-2009 2:48 PM


Re: Moral Cognitive Dissonance
I added it to post 393
Who cares who they are, they exist and so there are more ways to interpret the Bible.
Maybe you would like to defend thier position for them, or ill wait to see if your initial assertion has any merit at all
Oh before I forget I have one you can use in your standup, possibly. You know that recent King Kong movie and the beautiful women as the lead. Well they were thinking of have Rosie Odonald as the lead, but the figured one beast in the movie was enough. Man that funny. I know it shouldnt be but it is
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.
Edited by EMA, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 395 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 2:48 PM onifre has not replied

  
Dawn Bertot
Member (Idle past 104 days)
Posts: 3571
Joined: 11-23-2007


Message 398 of 410 (537602)
11-29-2009 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 397 by onifre
11-29-2009 3:00 PM


Re: Moral Cognitive Dissonance
i have an addition look at 396

This message is a reply to:
 Message 397 by onifre, posted 11-29-2009 3:00 PM onifre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024