Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,357 Year: 3,614/9,624 Month: 485/974 Week: 98/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   At what point should we look for a non-materialistic explanation?
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 124 of 160 (538475)
12-07-2009 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Modulous
12-06-2009 7:17 PM


Re: the mind and the physical
Greetings Modulous, (btw, I dig bands from Manchester and enjoy that show Shameless
The mind, the the physicalist might say, is not a noun, but a verb.
Well you cant run without legs, But you can in dreams.
I believe it is both. Like almost everything in nature a combination of properties. Positive & Negative, Male & Female, Matter & anti-matter, Deterministic & non Deterministic, Physical & non-physical.
As far as the Universe being deterministic goes I believe it is. To a point. http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/wjf/BD.Stochastic.chaos.name.pdf
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/chao-dyn/pdf/9306/9306005v1.pdf
http://www.physics.mcgill.ca/...vejoy/neweprint/stochall.pdf
I believe we should not abandon the notion of non-physical until we have a deeper understanding.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Modulous, posted 12-06-2009 7:17 PM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Modulous, posted 12-07-2009 5:14 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 126 of 160 (538503)
12-07-2009 3:20 PM
Reply to: Message 123 by lyx2no
12-07-2009 3:18 AM


Re: Out of the Blue
Greetings Lyx2NO!
What I find intriguing about this kind of research is the why of it.
The why of it is that Dr. Randi stated he would pay a million dollars to the author if he could provide evidence of this though a double blind independant study. They declined, and then came up with there own study.
What gave these guy the idea that thinking good thoughts at water would produce more ascetically pleasing crystals? Usually an experiment is an attempt to confirm a prediction demanded by an hypothesis. What was their hypothesis that lead them down this trail?
A better question I think is why would something subjective as asthetics or beauty of the crystals be used as a basis for determinining positive thoughts verses negative. This is in itself bias and anthropomophizing to happy & good thoughts= pretty crystals compared to; mean & mad thought = ugly crystals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 123 by lyx2no, posted 12-07-2009 3:18 AM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 129 by lyx2no, posted 12-07-2009 4:08 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 127 of 160 (538504)
12-07-2009 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 125 by Straggler
12-07-2009 2:07 PM


Re: Wonderous Ignorance?
Hi Straggler,
I pity your attitude to life.
I have never had anyone tell me that before.
I am not sure how to respond.
I guess I should re-examine my life and figure out where I went wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Straggler, posted 12-07-2009 2:07 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Straggler, posted 12-07-2009 3:32 PM 1.61803 has seen this message but not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 132 of 160 (538552)
12-07-2009 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by lyx2no
12-07-2009 4:08 PM


Re: Out of the Blue
Magic is unexplained phenomenon that confounds until the trick is learned. Magic is entertainment.
Intuition, Dreams, conciousness,language, ideas are examples of how the non physical can influence and direct our decisions.
I mentioned that the forces of nature are non physical and was told that they are considered physical. Even though they are not composed of matter or have mass.
I am not sure what is being asked. Is your point that there is nothing in the universe that can be called non physical? Therefore the notion should be dispensed with ouright?
I believe there is more to the universe than the sum of its parts.
Just as I believe there is more to a human being than the sum of its parts. I know, I know, click copy quote and destroy. Why would anyone think such things. Call me a romantic.
Edited by 1.61803, : added language.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by lyx2no, posted 12-07-2009 4:08 PM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by lyx2no, posted 12-07-2009 10:55 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 133 of 160 (538565)
12-07-2009 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 130 by Modulous
12-07-2009 5:14 PM


Re: the mind and the physical
Greetings Modulus,
I am not involved in neuro research. I do happen to work in the research field for pharmaceutical companies as well as respiratory medicine. I have seen over the course of several years the research and FDA approval and marketing of monoclonal medications for respiratory disease. If someone told me fifteen years ago such a thing was possible I would have scoffed. We are now treating asthma on a level far up the immunological inflammatory cascade before the damages of cytokines take place.
I say this because all research fields ar always in flux.You may yourself be doing research. Some say what a difference a day makes is an understatement. Serendipity and luck sometimes really means the difference in breakthroughs. Some say the immune system may be the first consciousness of an organism. Now that sounds far out and ridiculous. It may be rubbish. Or maybe ten years from now someone may link the immune system with consciousness. Today the academics are even talking about how the fluctuations of adrenergics in autonomic nervous system could be responsible for a whole host of disease previously thought to be isolated as individual disorders.
I do agree with you though in that I do not see how science could ever glean knowledge from the unknowable.
Edited by 1.61803, : spelling,grammer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Modulous, posted 12-07-2009 5:14 PM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 136 of 160 (538625)
12-08-2009 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 134 by lyx2no
12-07-2009 10:55 PM


Re: Out of the Blue
Goodmorning Lyx2NO,
The question is "can it?". I think it can with a certainty of 99.999999999%. Others, however, believe anything they personally don't understand intuitively is caused by unnatural forces. So, At what point should we look for a non-materialistic explanation?
If we equivocate "non-materialistic" as super natural then I would say I agree with you. However, in my opinion there is NOTHING that exist in nature that is supernatural. The fact that it exist means it is natural in my opinion. And if this is so then it seems reasonable to conclude that if something exist that is non-material then it is natural too.
Humans have yet to discover the origin of the fundamental forces, from whence energy came into being, or how recreate life from non life. Why there is stuff,(Higgs).
There may be nonmaterlistic explanations yet to be discovered. Hogwash you say? Fine you may be right, I may be crazy, Oh but it just may be a lunatic your looking for!!!!
I think it can with a certainty of 99.999999999%
Why not go the whole enchilada?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by lyx2no, posted 12-07-2009 10:55 PM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by lyx2no, posted 12-08-2009 4:20 PM 1.61803 has replied

  
1.61803
Member (Idle past 1523 days)
Posts: 2928
From: Lone Star State USA
Joined: 02-19-2004


Message 139 of 160 (538753)
12-09-2009 3:25 PM
Reply to: Message 138 by lyx2no
12-08-2009 4:20 PM


Re: Out of the Blue
We have yet to discover any effect that didn't make trade-offs. Until we do non-materialistic explanations are a non-starter.
Sorry to poof out on you, but I agree with this. It only took about a week. But I finally see your point. Well played sir.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 138 by lyx2no, posted 12-08-2009 4:20 PM lyx2no has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024