Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   'Some still living' disproves literal truth of the bible
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 61 of 479 (538489)
12-07-2009 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Peg
12-07-2009 1:41 AM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
perhaps i should ask you why you think Jesus made such a dramatic statement?
Along with:
John writes:
14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Peg according to the deifinition of ekklsia
Any group of people called out in a meeting for a specific purpose is a church. Whether it is a PTA meeting, a Lyons club, boy scouts, etc. They all fit the requirements of a church.
So Jesus Church must be a group of people He called out of the world for a specific purpose.
In Matthew 4:18 it tells of Jesus walking by the sea of Galilee saw Peter and Andrew casting a net.
In verse 19 He saith unto them, "follow me and I will make you fishers of men.
In verse 20 they straightway followed Him.
We have two men called out from their jobs as fishermen to the job of fishing for men for Jesus. That constituted Jesus Church.
During Jesus personal ministry of some 3 1/2 years He acquired 120 disciples in His Church.
This group of people was taught what they were supposed to do by Jesus Himself.
They were given a set of marching orders prior to Jesus ascension.
Matthew writes:
28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
28:19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:
28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.
Jesus speaking to His disciples said, "All power is given unto me"
He then tells His discipls:
'Go ye' which is translated from the Greek word poreu which means:
1) to lead over, carry over, transfer
a) to pursue the journey on which one has entered, to continue on one's journey
'teach' translated from the Greek word mathteu which means:
1) to be a disciple of one
a) to follow his precepts and instructions
'all' translated from the Greek word pas which means:
1) individually
a) each, every, any,
'nations' translated from the Greek word ethnos which means:
1) a multitude associated or living together
'baptizing' translated from the Greek word baptiz which means:
1) to dip repeatedly, to immerse, to submerge (of vessels sunk)
Therefore Jesus tells His Church.
As you go, we don't have a choice we journey here on earth till we die.
Make disciples. Disciples are people who have believed Jesus and been born of the Holy Spirit.
Baptizing them. The Church was to immerse, by sumerging those born again disciples in water.
After which they were to teach those born again, baptized believers, all things He had taught the Church.
That is the order Jesus set up and any other order is out of order.
Now to answer the question, What is a scriptural New Testament Church of Jesus Christ.
Any local group of scripturally baptized born again children of God who are called out of the world and assembled together to accomplish making disciples and then baptizing them and then teaching them the all things Jesus taught.
Any group that is not doing things the way Jesus set them up is not a Church of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Therefore there is only one scriptural New Testament Church.
The one that believes Jesus and is doing things the way He set it up.
Edited by ICANT, : correct spelling

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Peg, posted 12-07-2009 1:41 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by Peg, posted 12-07-2009 6:07 PM ICANT has replied

  
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2914 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


(1)
Message 62 of 479 (538490)
12-07-2009 2:30 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Statman
12-06-2009 1:53 AM


Re: False prophecy of Tyre
statman writes:
In reading history, I found that it (Tyre) had been rebuilt multiple times. Then I read the Lebanese tourist site and found it was a thriving city. Finally, (somewhat later), I got on Google Maps and looked at it from the satellite view. Sure enough, the island, the causeway and the mainland are covered with a thriving city!
You underestimate the versatility of the word for word fundamentalists. I am sure the answer would be - well, there may have been other cities built on the same site but the original city was not rebuilt. It is a battle not worth fighting, imo.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Statman, posted 12-06-2009 1:53 AM Statman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 8:58 AM deerbreh has not replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 63 of 479 (538493)
12-07-2009 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Dawn Bertot
12-05-2009 10:23 AM


Square Brackets
EMA,
When you tag items as (a), (b), (c) etc. within a quote box, please use the parentheses instead of square brackets.
[b] begins the bold dBcode and messes up the quote box and the box won't appear correctly.
Thanks
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Typo

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Dawn Bertot, posted 12-05-2009 10:23 AM Dawn Bertot has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 64 of 479 (538532)
12-07-2009 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by deerbreh
12-07-2009 1:39 PM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
deerbreh writes:
Well you keep missing the point I and EMA are making. I don't see any point in repeating so I will say it a different way and leave it go at that... God looks on the heart, humans look at outward things so why don't you let God be the judge of who might be in and who might be out if that is a concern for you? As for me, I am too busy making sure I am doing the Lord's work to be keeping score on others.
im not talking about individuals here, im talking about the adminstration of christianity.
You havnt commented on why Jesus said
Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens"
Surely his words should be taken seriously? If we do take them seriously we would be obliged to scrutinize our religons and our religous leaders. If we dont, then perhaps we will unwittingly fall into the category of people who are being 'prevented from entering the kingdom of God' because our religous leaders are misleading us by failing to uphold the teachings and standards that Jesus and the apostles upheld.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by deerbreh, posted 12-07-2009 1:39 PM deerbreh has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by deerbreh, posted 12-17-2009 10:10 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 65 of 479 (538534)
12-07-2009 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by ICANT
12-07-2009 2:20 PM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Hi ICANT,
thats a fine rundown
ICANT writes:
Any local group of scripturally baptized born again children of God who are called out of the world and assembled together to accomplish making disciples and then baptizing them and then teaching them the all things Jesus taught.
Good, so by this then we should be able to determine which of the many thousands of christian church's are actually teaching what Jesus taught.
ICANT writes:
Therefore there is only one scriptural New Testament Church.
The one that believes Jesus and is doing things the way He set it up.
Right, so now we get to the crux of the matter. The standards and form of christianity as set out in the NT should be the basis for testing if a christian church is a true church or not.
I think we've taken this offtopic now, but a thread on the NT criteria would be a good idea at this point. If you have any suggestions on what that criteria is, and if you have time, perhaps you could join in a new thread?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by ICANT, posted 12-07-2009 2:20 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 2:15 AM Peg has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 66 of 479 (538581)
12-08-2009 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Peg
12-07-2009 6:07 PM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
Right, so now we get to the crux of the matter. The standards and form of christianity as set out in the NT should be the basis for testing if a christian church is a true church or not.
Well that is the problem.
We have over 1288 different so called christian churches in the US.
Each one of them think they are the true church.
Nobody liked the old time religion that the song was written about, so they modernized it. Brought it up to speed so to speak because it was outdated and not good enough for the times we live in.
The first problem was the Bible so they rewrote it to suit their own needs and beliefs.
Many are still trying to rewrite it today, even here at EvC.
In Message 19 I broke down and discussed what Matthew 16:27, 28 says using the Greek and the proper rules for Bible Analysis.
Peepful responded to the message but no one else did.
No one refuted the post.
Matthew 16:27 has not taken place yet as Jesus has not set up a physical kingdom on earth yet.
Matthew writes:
16:28 Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
The Greek word basileia translated kingdom here refers to royal power, authority, dominion.
basileia comes from the root word basileus which means:
1) leader of the people, prince, commander, lord of the land, king
When Jesus entered Jerusalem riding on the colt of an ass in His triumphant entrance coming in His kingdom authority there was some there that received Him as King.
Most rejected Him and crucified Him 5 days later.
So yes there was many that heard Jesus words recorded in Matthew 16:28 that saw Him come in His Kingdom authority, as there was a parade in which the King entered Jerusalem
One day Jesus will sit on a physical throne in Jerusalem and rule the entire world from there. Then He will have a physical kingdom and a physical rule.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Peg, posted 12-07-2009 6:07 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 9:17 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 73 by Peg, posted 12-09-2009 5:10 AM ICANT has replied

  
Statman
Junior Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 17
Joined: 12-06-2009


Message 67 of 479 (538616)
12-08-2009 8:58 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by deerbreh
12-07-2009 2:30 PM


Re: False prophecy of Tyre
You underestimate the versatility of the word for word fundamentalists. I am sure the answer would be - well, there may have been other cities built on the same site but the original city was not rebuilt. It is a battle not worth fighting, imo.
Do I? I've already heard that silly response and others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by deerbreh, posted 12-07-2009 2:30 PM deerbreh has not replied

  
Statman
Junior Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 17
Joined: 12-06-2009


Message 68 of 479 (538619)
12-08-2009 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by ICANT
12-08-2009 2:15 AM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Icant writes
When Jesus entered Jerusalem riding on the colt of an ass in His triumphant entrance coming in His kingdom authority there was some there that received Him as King.
First, that's no indication of superhuman powers if you just make a statement about a future even and then go stage the fulfillment.
Second, we have no external confirmation the 'fulfillment' ever happened.
Third, that's really stretching it to say he was a king and that was a 'coming into his kingdom'. He was an itinerate preacher who may or may not have made a not all that impressive an entrance into the city. Further, there is no kingdom involved.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 2:15 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 11:08 AM Statman has replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 69 of 479 (538628)
12-08-2009 11:08 AM
Reply to: Message 68 by Statman
12-08-2009 9:17 AM


Re: Kingdom
Hi Statman,
Welcome to EvC.
Statman writes:
Third, that's really stretching it to say he was a king and that was a 'coming into his kingdom'.
The multitude of people that were there:
Matthew writes:
21:8 And a very great multitude spread their garments in the way; others cut down branches from the trees, and strawed [them] in the way.
Sounds like a parade to me.
Matthew writes:
21:9 And the multitudes that went before, and that followed, cried, saying, Hosanna to the Son of David: Blessed [is] he that cometh in the name of the Lord; Hosanna in the highest.
The Israelites had been looking for a king of the lineage of David to come and set them free from their bondage for hundreds of years.
The multitude accepted Jesus as that king.
Mark recorded the events with these comments.
Mark writes:
Mar 11:10 Blessed [be] the kingdom of our father David, that cometh in the name of the Lord: Hosanna in the highest.
They were looking for a king to come and take the throne of David and rule the world forever as that is what had been promised.
Jesus was rejected by the majority as king because He did not come riding on a white charger with a large army and take over all government functions.
They refused to accept the one come to set them free from the bondage of sin because all they wanted was someone to set them free from Roman rule.
Statman writes:
He was an itinerate preacher who may or may not have made a not all that impressive an entrance into the city.
I guess you could say He was a traveling announcer, that according to the folks that were there and wrote about His entrance said it caused quite a stir.
Statman writes:
Further, there is no kingdom involved.
You will get no argument from me on this point as that is what I was trying to prove by the definitions of the Greek word translated kingdom.
He had kingdom authority then as He has had since He created the universe and everything in it.
There was no physical kingdom set up during Jesus trip to earth in the flesh body like a man. He came the first time as a deliverer from the bondage of sin the first man sold us into.
When He comes the second time He will be riding on that white charger, and all the governments of the world will bow down to His authority.
He will then set up a government and rule the world from Jerusalem.
The True Church is not the kingdom but she does have kingdom authority.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 9:17 AM Statman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 2:37 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 71 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 3:00 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Statman
Junior Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 17
Joined: 12-06-2009


Message 70 of 479 (538646)
12-08-2009 2:37 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by ICANT
12-08-2009 11:08 AM


Re: Kingdom
Icant,
Excuse me but why are you posting this material to me? I am likely much more familiar with it than you are - unless you have a theology degree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 11:08 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 4:46 PM Statman has replied

  
Statman
Junior Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 17
Joined: 12-06-2009


Message 71 of 479 (538649)
12-08-2009 3:00 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by ICANT
12-08-2009 11:08 AM


Re: Kingdom
Icant,
One more thing, you say:
"There was no physical kingdom set up during Jesus trip to earth in the flesh body like a man."
Thanks for that admission. You are making my point. Since this did not happen, the prophecy (assuming it was ever made by Jesus) was NOT fulfilled.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 11:08 AM ICANT has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 72 of 479 (538651)
12-08-2009 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Statman
12-08-2009 2:37 PM


Re: Kingdom
Hi Statman,
Statman writes:
Excuse me but why are you posting this material to me? I am likely much more familiar with it than you are - unless you have a theology degree.
As far as you being more qualified than I am, you may be. But I seriously doubt it.
You sound like some of the first year students I have had in the past.
And from your post in reply to my post Message 66 to Peg I don't put much stock in that piece of sheepskin if you really have one.
In Message 71 You:
Statman writes:
Thanks for that admission. You are making my point. Since this did not happen, the prophecy (assuming it was ever made by Jesus) was NOT fulfilled.
I wasn't admiting anything, I was making a statement of fact.
The prophecy of Jesus coming in kingdom power did happen upon His triumphant entry into Jerusalem.
This prophecy:
Matthew writes:
16:27 For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
Is still in the future.
Do you believe in the future return of Jesus to the earth?
Matthew writes:
25:31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
25:32 And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats:
Do you believe this prophecy will come to pass?
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Statman, posted 12-08-2009 2:37 PM Statman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Statman, posted 12-09-2009 10:11 PM ICANT has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4951 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 73 of 479 (538670)
12-09-2009 5:10 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by ICANT
12-08-2009 2:15 AM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Hi ICANT,
ICANT writes:
One day Jesus will sit on a physical throne in Jerusalem and rule the entire world from there. Then He will have a physical kingdom and a physical rule.
why do you think its going to be a physical rule?
Why cant it be a rulership from heaven?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 2:15 AM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by ICANT, posted 12-09-2009 12:22 PM Peg has not replied

  
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 74 of 479 (538724)
12-09-2009 12:22 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Peg
12-09-2009 5:10 AM


Re: Inerrancy question or interpretation question?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
why do you think its going to be a physical rule?
Because the Bible teaches that it will be.
Since a discussion of that would be off topic in this thread, why don't you start a thread on the end times and we can discuss the events leading up to:
Matthew writes:
25:31 When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory:
And those events following.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Peg, posted 12-09-2009 5:10 AM Peg has not replied

  
Statman
Junior Member (Idle past 5059 days)
Posts: 17
Joined: 12-06-2009


Message 75 of 479 (538771)
12-09-2009 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by ICANT
12-08-2009 4:46 PM


Re: Kingdom
I’ve been slow to respond because I’ve been thinking about what you said from time to time since you said it. This msg will be somewhat peripheral to the topic. I may post a more direct response later.
As far as you being more qualified than I am, you may be. But I doubt it.
What I said was based on your lengthy response in msg 69. It was stuff I am well aware of and which anyone could have posted after going to an apologetics site. In looking at some of your other msgs, I notice you comment on greek words. These also could be looked up. Alternatively, you may have formal course work in the language. In your latest response, I see mention of your first year students, so I presume you are a teacher of religious classes. However, I also note that you did not mention having a theology degree. Could you clarify what your education and occupation are?
My statement was also based on the reasonable assumption that you were an average American. In my view, the average American knows very little about the Bible and has had no formal instruction in it. I on the other hand, have had such instruction in 4 years of parochial boarding school where we were immersed in the matter as well as 4 years of parochial college. In addition, I’ve done far more reading than the average American on the subject.
You sound like some of my first year students I have had in the past.
I suppose so. More advanced students have generally either accepted the answer they were given (gullibly in my view), rejected it but do not wish to belabor the point, (a few) or dropped out of school entirely (a few). In my case I once accepted one of the three apologetic answers I am aware of but later rejected it. I have no grade at risk from a teacher and I am not bogging the class down on a point.
And from your post in reply to my post Message 66 to Peg I don’t put much stock in that piece of sheepskin if you really have one.
I initially was rather annoyed by your statement for not one but two reasons. I have made absolutely no claim in any post on this board to any degree. And I find your questioning of my veracity is annoying too. I have no reason to lie. I’m here to have a civil and mature discussion. For the record, I do have a bachelor’s degree in math with a minor in physics.
Finally, you ask me several question. The answer is no, I am not a believer.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by ICANT, posted 12-08-2009 4:46 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by ICANT, posted 12-10-2009 11:41 AM Statman has replied
 Message 78 by AdminPD, posted 12-10-2009 6:41 PM Statman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024