Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   An inconvenient truth.... or lie?
Little Ruru
Junior Member (Idle past 5025 days)
Posts: 1
From: New Zealand
Joined: 12-12-2009


(1)
Message 138 of 191 (539063)
12-12-2009 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 135 by John 10:10
12-12-2009 11:34 AM


Re: Climate change man-caused?
Hi John 10:10 & EvC
John 10:10 writes:
(3) Since 1998 the global temps have actually decreased about 0.6C. When this data could not be fit into the fudged temp models that declared man's CO2 emissions were causing global temps to irreversibly increase, then a massive cover-up ensued to suppress this information.
Mr Jack writes:
The concept of a trend is too difficult for you, huh?
Perhaps this really is a difficult concept for you? A quick look at wikipedia helps to put this issue into perspective:
Temperatures in 1998 were unusually warm because the strongest El Nio in the past century occurred during that year.[12] Global temperature is subject to short-term fluctuations that overlay long term trends and can temporarily mask them. The relative stability in temperature from 1999 to 2009 is consistent with such an episode.[13][14]
Source: Climate change - Wikipedia
Note also that there is no mention of a decrease since 1998, just an apparent stability in temperature since then.
...a massive cover-up ensued to suppress this information...
Think about what you (and others) are claiming here. The immense pile of evidence confirms that GW and its anthropogenic causes are a reality. Do you really think it's logistically possible to orchestrate a cover up/conspiracy on such a massive scale? Where is the evidence for this? Think about the many thousands of people involved and not one legitimate whistle-blower saying "they made me fudge my statistics!". The recent email hacking provides no such evidence either, as recently pointed out by Huntard, Taz and Otto Tellick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 135 by John 10:10, posted 12-12-2009 11:34 AM John 10:10 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024