sidelined
Member (Idle past 5936 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: 08-30-2003
|
Something has occured to me in thinking about the original post of this thread. We must be able to fully define the point at which we consider something as alive as opposed to inanimate before we can give a sufficient investigation into the process.Anybody here have an idea of how we can do this?
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 128 by Hideyoshi, posted 08-17-2003 1:41 AM | | Hideyoshi has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 133 by crashfrog, posted 09-05-2003 12:58 AM | | sidelined has not replied |
|
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5936 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: 08-30-2003
|
|
Message 138 of 141 (54000)
09-05-2003 8:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 135 by Andor
09-05-2003 6:22 AM
|
|
I guess this is a point where if we can show a transition of chemicals that is agreed by both sides to be inanimate when in contact with another chemical would be ,at the least , arguably life then we could perhaps refine the studies until we found something that would be undeniably LIFE.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 135 by Andor, posted 09-05-2003 6:22 AM | | Andor has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 139 by Mammuthus, posted 09-05-2003 8:26 AM | | sidelined has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2