|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Smelling The Coffee: 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
Perhaps if you wish to support your foolish assumption you could cite evidence that Christian fundamentalism or even other non-Christian fundamentalists are the chief reason for international terrorism today on planet earth. Don't let the US media and their anti-Islamic agenda fool you , Buz. You actually think there are no christian fundamentalist terrorist groups internationally, or non-Islamic terrorist groups? Wow!
source quote: These are just the Christian terrorist groups. Let me know if you need all the non-Islaimc/non-Christian terrorist groups......... Change the channel from FoxNews just one time, Buz! - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
The basis of the emnity wasn't so much religion as it was the result of (the often very cruel) colonialistation of Ireland by the 'Brits'.
The same can be said these days between the Shia and the Sunni.
source quote: - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
Hi Buz,
Can you cite any mainstream media, including Fox which has covered any of the stuff you cited to any extent in the past six months or year? Mmm, must be it's not so prevalent. That's the point- the mainstream media isn't promoting anything these days that doesn't involve Islam and Muslims. We need an enemy to focus on, and the Middle East is our current target. Not in a conspiratorial way (relax Straggler) just in a: they have to promote what's popular and trendy - and currently Middle Eastern terrorist threats are drawing a mass audience. Just look at the movie industry (who is always a good indicator for what's popular.)
Btw, communism is one way athiestic and secularistic sheeple could ban and restrict religion. As has been pointed out to you by others, communism doesn't have to be atheist. North Korea, which is more a form of Fascism, is considered communism by the media, yet they worship the Emperor. Also, communism, along with fascism must take out all other insitutions who control peoples opinions - like the church, any church. Yet, even Hitler had a connection to the Roman Catholic Church - so it can also have a religious affiliation.
Perhaps the real solution to make the planet more peaceful is for the lord and christ Jesus, champion of fundamentalist Christians, who is prophesied to come to rule and reign on the planet at Jerusalem, to come soon. YES! Let me know a month before that happens so I can cancel my Netflix subscription. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
And are "we" not their target also? Yes, but we are also the target of other terrorist organizations, yet its not that popoular to talk about it in our media. That's why Buz asked me to show him stories in the mainstream media. Because he knew I wouldn't find any. Not that there aren't stories to cover, its just that the mainstream only covers middle eastern terrorist groups.
Are we saying that the Moslem world had no grievances against the West before Hollywood decided it needed a new "baddy"? Hollywood promotes what's popular. Not conspiratorial, Straggler! - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
I accept that. But who do you think deserves equal attention based on practical reality as opposed to media bias? Funny how you mentioned it to Buz but didn't catch that my cynicism would lead to the same answer. The US is the biggest threat, guilded in it's previous admin by a fundamentalist CHRISTIAN - as was his father - as is the support of Israel, which is also a terrorist state - One that has the weapons to destroy us all. You can argue semantics if you want, try to point out the political problems if you like, but Israel and the US are fundamentalist states (at least the US was - but I fear it will be yet again). And there should be no argument that Israel is a fundamentalist state, right? However, and I don't want to get into a long list of terrorist groups and how they affect us all, but the groups around the world, Asia and South America specifically, are groups that terrorize (not at the level of Al Qaeda for example) but to a lesser degree. Yet the news covers very little if any at all. I could get specific if you really wanted to get into that. It would require some effort on my part to dig up news stories from independent sources.
True. But that could be translated as Hollywood promotes what people will believe is (semi) realistic. True, but also, like you mention with the environment, they tackle crap that is irrelevant and complete bullshit (like 2012 for example). But yes, their current Middle East terror movies (some) are pretty accurate.
When you are as paranoid as me there are conspiracies at every turn!! Aluminum hat is on! - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
So a born again Christian says he has gone to war with another country because God told him to and you don't think that has any relevance to fundamentalist beliefs and violence at all? BINGO!!! Now, can you name a larger fundamentalist group that has caused more violence around the world? - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
No. The Commander In Chief of the military, in agreement with a significant number of Congress and Senate with the blessings of the majority of the people, after much of the economy and over 3000 of our citizens were destroyed by an enemy made the decision to go to war with the nation which sanctioned, supported and supported the attack, for which the Taliban took credit. People, including statesmen of all faiths were behind the action of the Commander In Chief of the military. No. You're making a point for Afghanistan. Straggler pointed out that Bush's comment was for invading Iraq. 3000 citizens were killed by Al Qaeda terrorist that were from Saudi Arabia - NOT Iraq or Afghanistan. If Bush intended to go to war with the nation that sanctioned and supported the attacks, he would have found NO ONE, because no nation sactioned or supported the attacks of 9/11. Some connections have been made to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, but of course one is an friend (not for long mind you) and the other is the ruler of the Oil Industry. So we can't attack either of those. We attacked the poverty stricken nation of Afghanistan, sadly, killed many of their innocent civilians, all the while claiming that we are doing it for the benefit of the people in Afghanistan - which is more bullshit. However, Straggler's point: Bush claimed that God himself told him to invade Iraq, that is no better than saying Allah told Bin Laden to attack the towers. Both are fundamentalist nonsense! One is Islamic fundamentalist nonsense, the other is Christian fundamentalist nonsense - BOTH statements were made by 2 lunatics who think they talk to an invisible man. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
And if God had told GWB specifically NOT to go to war in Iraq? Of course by God in this context you mean Bush SR., right? You're right on point with your argument Straggler. Scary that both Bin Laden and Bush claim to have a direct hotline to God, yet both were told to attack different places. Either the God(s) are toying with us or some other being has hijacked God's cellphone - I'm assuming it's an iPhone - I mean, its God. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
BTW, I've been predicticting the Nuking of Vatican City for decades, including here at EvC. (Iran/Pakistan/North Korea etc nukes? They all hate the Vatican) It will happen; perhaps not for a decade or two and perhaps very soon, but it will happen. I'm using both logic and Revelation 17 and 18. I'm also applying the prophecies that Islam will prevail as a global dictatorial power. To do that Vatican has to go. This will eliminate that age long rival of Islam. The two politico-religious entities have kept each other at bay all of these centuries but Islam is fast leaving the Vatican in the dust so far as prolifically populating the planet and recruiting converted children. (Buz passes the joint to, Oni) Oni: Yeah! And then, once the Vatican has been nuked, it's nuthin' but a party for Islam after that! Burka's are coming off, Zeppelin blasting from their iPod's - we'll start filming 'Girls Gone Wild - Saudi Arabia style'. It's gonna be great. Oh, and Israel is in on the whole thing, don't be fooled. Islam and the Jews hate Catholics equally. Especially catholic school girl outfits - totally off putting to 'em. The US will be fine because, well, we have the rights to all the Mc Donalds and Burger Kings - and everyone them Muslims LOVE their McD's & BK.
(Oni takes another drag.....) Soon after that, the UFO's start showing up, bring all the Mayan's back that they abducted years ago. We'll finally get hoverboards, flying cars, virtual porn, 4D IMAX movies. It's gonna be great, right Buz?
(Oni turns to pass the joint to, Buz. Buz is passed out, having smoked more than anyone past the age of 70 should smoke - unless you're Willy Nelson. Oni robs Buz for the $20 in his pocket and is off to buy more pot. Tomorrow, when Buz is curious about where the money went, Oni will tell him that a group of radical Islamic fundamentalist stole his cash and took all the pot. Buz will believe him and claim to have predicted it would happen) - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
I/We know that Americans are no more like that than Brits are bowler hat, pin stripe suit wearing gents who eat fish and chips followed by boiled beef every day whilst out shooting pheasants and shouting "Tally ho" in Hugh Grant type accents. You forgot the beach shorts with the black dress socks on - or are those Germany tourist? I can't tell you guys apart. That's always a classic. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
Why should it matter what the founders rose up against in protest?
Because Buz is as old as the founders, and was there with them protesting. He's so senile at this point that he thinks he's still there.
Are we required to agree with and emulate the founders on every occasion? Not on every, on any, or even on one occasion. I think they would have preferred for us to think and evaluate any and all issues on our own - like they, the founding fathers, did. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
Hi Briterican,
First, I've been curious about your name - are you a Puerto Rican living in Britain? Since its brit-e-rican. Or is it brit-erican, as in Brit and American? Now to my cynical opinion of your post - lol. I haven't had a chance to fully read all the posts, but I read this one and Legend's post that you responded to. I'm not in favor of either position, yet, but I'd like to point a few things out and perhaps you may like to debate it.
Through the political process, hacks that clearly have no experience are (usually, apart from Sarah Palin) eliminated in the early going. Does Dan Quayle ring a bell? There is no way of eliminating incompetence in politics, it is always done in hindsight. Unfortunately, the general public (or rather, the voting public, which is about 35% of the US) is unaware, or been made apathetic, due to the ability of the hacks to properly campaign and control information. The political process is sadly a joke if you are trying to weed out hacks.
the laws of the land rest in the hands of everyone equally, no matter how educated, qualified, informed, or cognizant they are. And yet, it is these uneducated, unqualified, uninformed people who are left responsible to vote and elect their officials? Boy, it must be easy to blindly lead this bewilldered herd where you want them to, is it not? There is a great effort taken to make sure the general public is uneducated, uninformed and unqualified - the privileged elites have seen to it that this is the status quo. I'm not advocating for Legend's idea, yet, however more of an effort to educate and inform the general public should be made. But it won't be made as long as the elite few are in control of the information - the media. One of the biggest threats to the status quo is an informed society, but distractions keep us entertain and dumbed down. So, people like yourself and others have no confidence in the general public, yet feel more comfortable following the orders of people who, when are not on the job, are also part of the general public. Point is, we are all capable, we're just not all privileged as others. And we/you are indoctrinated into a system the maintains this level of deception.
Do you really want major decisions made by the general public in the fashion of direct democracy? Not with the current state of how our media and information is controlled - it would be stupid to think otherwise, so on this we agree. If this was radically changed however, then I see no reason why any human being couldn't be capable of making proper decisions about their lives. Politicians are just as stupid as anyone else, they just act like they aren't. However, if properly educated, any one of us can be politically knowledgable enough to assess any issue. Think of how unions work.
Do you really think that it would be wise to implement a system in which the many people who are uneducated on particular matters get votes equivalent to those who are informed and in a position to make wiser choices? We are still talking about biological organisms, right? First thing any good system, that has the people in mind needs to do, is figure out why people are uneducated and uniformed in particular matters. If you find that the system of informing people (ie. the mainstream media) is corrupted and placating to special intrests groups, then this is the first thing that needs to get corrected. And in the future, people won't refer to the general public as uninformed, uneducated simple-minded individuals who are incapable of making proper decisions for their communities.
Do you really think it would be wise to implement a system in which there is no-one to hold accountable after the fact
I think not sir. I think the prospect of direct democracy, if applied to decisions on anything more important than the American Idol or X-Factor winner, would be disastrous. It's sad to see people hold politicians in a higher catagory than their fellow citizens. Not that I disagree with you, but I see many reasons why the public is left to decide on American Idol - rather than on political affairs - that have everything to do with the way the system is run by the elite few who are selling our country out from under us, rather than the inability of human beings to learn. I recommend, not only a healthy dose of psilocybin magic mushrooms, but also for you and others to watch Manufacturing Consent. Here's a quick video: - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
A large number of voters thought they were keeping the bill by voting yes, even a teacher who taught civics. So you're saying that the Bill was worded in such a manner as to confuse even a civics teacher? Isn't that the fault of those writing the Bill? Thank Buddha we have those knowledgable politicians, without them we'd still be banging two stones together for fire. - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
I don't think so, it was the fault of reading into the question. What the measure attempted was to reverse a bill thus a yes vote was to eliminate the bill and it was worded that way. Fair enough. But what are you essentially getting at? Surely you're not claiming that politicians are better at reading? Perhaps the way Bills are written requires a certain level of knowledge, just as say reading a prescription, but it's not something that either can be re-worded to normal dialogue or taught, right? - Oni
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2978 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
What do you think the answer is Oni? That depends on what the question is. Legalize pot, shrooms and prostitution...that may be my answer to everything. Seriously though, my answer to what question specifically?
Which to my mind makes Winston even more cynical than you.
Give a brotha a little more time. I can get there! - Oni
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024