Hi Buz,
Incredible that after all your time here you still don't understand how evolution works.
What you're looking for with the 25 die is an analogy with evolution. If you insist on a scenario that requires that one die is thrown once and must come up 6 otherwise you lose and there's no point throwing the next die, then that isn't analogous to evolution.
If you insist on a scenario that requires throwing all 25 die at once and requiring them all to come up 6, then that isn't analogous to evolution, either. Evolution proceeds in small steps of a mutation here, then a few generations later a mutation there. Large numbers of simultaneous mutations causing macro evolution in a single generation is not evolution, it's a miracle.
Let's say there's a population of finches that reproduces for generation after generation until one finch experiences a mutation that gives it a longer beak that gives it a survival/reproduction advantage. That's equivalent to throwing one die over and over and over again until it comes up 6.
The mutation is passed on offspring who pass it on to their offspring who pass it on to their offspring and so on and on (equivalent to throwing the next die many times but it never comes up 6), until in one generation a descendant experiences a mutation that gives it an even longer beak that gives it an even greater survival/reproduction advantage. That's equivalent to many throws of the next die until it comes up 6.
You're approach seems to be this: "If you can't explain something to me clearly enough for me to understand it, then you're wrong." Which is, of course, ridiculous. In other words, the only thing you're proving here is that after all these years, you still don't understand how evolution works, and so you're still offering nonsensical disproofs.
--Percy