Math's Arbitrary Non-Necessary Necessarily-Disconnected Conventional Link to Reality

I've answered already though, at Message 81. It is. To me, it's like asking whether 1 - 0 - 0 - 0 ... is somehow different from 1. I cannot understand most of the arguments from the other side, they seem to be trying to say that one divided by infinity is something other than 0.I don't have any problem with repeating decimals, they are simply a weird effect of the base system. I do have a problem with non-repeating decimals, but it is not the same problem the constructivists apparently have.Interestingly, CatholicScientist gives a variation on the same proof that I do. Message 7