So a god that is behind the existence of everything and that doesn't break his own laws is natural. I have no objection to that as it was actually my point that we cannot know if existence is natural or supernatural. It can be both, depending if God exists or not.
You appear to be trying to redefine the definition of words depending on the correctness of your personal theological opinions.
This would be stupid.
You said jewelery was natural and obviously implicitly made the assumption that existence of said jewelery or whatever is natural(not created by a God).
But no "assumption" exists. I say that I have no evidence that any nose-jewelery contravenes the laws of nature. Therefore I provisionally class nose-jewelery as natural.
Show me evidence to the contrary.
When you get too indocrinated into a belief, it's quite common to lose track of the assumptions you are making.
And when a person is too stupid or too wrong to argue against what I am actually saying, it's quite common for them to retreat into an insane halfwitted fantasy world in which they make up some ludicrous fantasy about what I'm saying and then try to argue against their idiotic fantasy about my beliefs which they've made up in their crazy little minds because they are too stupid and pathetic and wrong to argue against anything that I have actually said.
Now, given that we apparently disagree about what
I think, which is more likely:
(1)
I know what my opinions are, and
you don't.
(2)
You know what my opinions are, and
I don't.
Think about this carefully, because if you go for option (2) you are mentally ill and should seek psychiatric help.