Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8945 total)
40 online now:
AZPaul3, DrJones*, Faith, frako, jar, PaulK, Percy (Admin), ringo, ski zawaski, Tanypteryx (10 members, 30 visitors)
Newest Member: ski zawaski
Post Volume: Total: 865,175 Year: 20,211/19,786 Month: 608/2,023 Week: 116/392 Day: 29/87 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Fred Williams goes down in flames... again
joz
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 42 (5184)
02-20-2002 2:59 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by derwood
02-20-2002 1:36 PM


Hey SLP any idea where JP is hiding out these days?

He quit out of a conversation with me a few weeks back wondering if you had any idea where he is trolling now so I can go and throw the proverbial gauntlet down.....


This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by derwood, posted 02-20-2002 1:36 PM derwood has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by mark24, posted 02-20-2002 9:01 PM joz has not yet responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 42 (5266)
02-21-2002 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by John Paul
02-21-2002 9:28 PM


Did you miss the last paragraph of percys last post JP?

It was a pretty clear instruction to everyone to cut the ad hom attacks....

Stonehenge and ID JP, you`ve got a post to answer.....


This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by John Paul, posted 02-21-2002 9:28 PM John Paul has not yet responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 42 (5267)
02-21-2002 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by John Paul
02-21-2002 9:28 PM


quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:
And yes I am dangerous. I have a free and open mind. My search for the truth, which is what science is all about, will not be constrained by the narrow vision of materialistic naturalism.

Damm the tactic of selective quotation is a real habit former isn`t it, you forgot the bit about ".....but by a 2,000 year old religious text the veracity of which is assumed in an act of blind faith" that should go on the end......


This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by John Paul, posted 02-21-2002 9:28 PM John Paul has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by John Paul, posted 02-22-2002 8:18 AM joz has responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 42 (5301)
02-22-2002 4:26 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by John Paul
02-22-2002 8:18 AM


quote:
Originally posted by John Paul:
John Paul:
First, Genesis is more than 2,000 years old. Second, my faith isn't blind. Third, I am not a Christian or a fundamentalist. Go figure.

John Paul


So you don`t put any credence in the new testament then?

What else do you call a position that is adopted against the bulk of the evidence, which attempts to introduce the supernatural to plug many gaps and has no positive evidence?

What are you then JP? The "my faith..." statement infers belief in some sort of supernatural power which one is it Jahweh, Allah, Ahura Mazda? Can`t be the God of the bible because you just said you aren`t a christian......


This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by John Paul, posted 02-22-2002 8:18 AM John Paul has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Theo, posted 02-22-2002 8:38 PM joz has responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 42 (5324)
02-22-2002 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Theo
02-22-2002 8:38 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Theo:
Hey Joz,
When you claim their is no positive evidence for the Bible I have to challenge you.

Sure theres positive evidence for the bible its a big heavy book that I`m looking across the room at as I type this.....

What theres no evidence for is the veracity of ALL its contents....

P.S The jousting can only start when you offer some possible evidence up......


This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Theo, posted 02-22-2002 8:38 PM Theo has not yet responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 42 (5461)
02-25-2002 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by derwood
02-25-2002 10:23 AM


quote:
Originally posted by SLP:
Email me

huxter4441@aol.com

and we can set up a meeting to work this all out.

I've grown quite tired of your rhetoric.


I hate to mention this but does anyone else get a certain pistols at dawn feeling about this meeting?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by derwood, posted 02-25-2002 10:23 AM derwood has not yet responded

  
joz
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 42 (5483)
02-25-2002 4:11 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by John Paul
02-25-2002 4:02 PM


For the third time JP it was the Ptolemaic model of a geocentric universe that the copernican model supplanted.....

So Ptolemaic would be a better term than aristotlean.....


This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by John Paul, posted 02-25-2002 4:02 PM John Paul has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by John Paul, posted 02-25-2002 5:57 PM joz has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019