hooah writes:
Refresh my memory: which group is advocating the addition of ID and/or creation "science" in the classroom? Normal everyday chrisitians? Or evangelicals?
A lot of gullible and ignorant people would see ID in the classroom. And many, if not most evangelicals (I'm too tired right now to look up exact stats, so I'm just going by personal experience), fall into the category of being ignorant of evolution.
This is a serious problem, but it is not born of malice like hate speech and murder.
I think where we differ is that I look at Christians on the scale of the individual, while you're look at them as a large cohesive monolithic group (which they are in some respects). While I would not like to share a neighbourhood with pastor Drake, I don't mind living in the same house with creationists. Creationists impede the betterment of education on the larger scale, but that doesn't necessarily make them bad as individuals. But a person who threatens to kill anyone is an evil person, in my opinion.
A herd of sheep can be a drag when they start plowing off in the wrong direction. They might ruin the farmer's day. But the sheep can be redirected back to the pen if shown the way. A vicious goat intent on killing the shepherd is more dangerous, and must be disabled or removed. I think many fundamentalist evangelicals are sheep, not goats, ignorant, not malicious, generally good people, not murderers.
I believe the ID movement is a crippling one, dangerous and misleading. But ultimately, I'm confident that enough minds will be changed, and the evolution debate will be settled in the public eye, even among fundamentalists. But I doubt we will ever be rid of the violent nutjobs.
hooah writes:
The other denomonations must just just skim past them, or take them with a grain of salt.
Exactly! And most fundamentalists that I know are not for reinstating stoning as a punishment for homosexuals. The Bible says a lot of things that most fundies don't seem to even realize are in there.
hooah writes:
I mentioned her because she gives these loonies a voice and a place in politics.
We both disagree with her politics. You disagree with her because she is a favourite of religious fundies and is one herself. You extend this to mean she represents the extreme views of pastor Drake, and other dangerous religious individuals. If this is not so, then I don't see how she pertains to this discussion.
Respectfully,
-Meldinoor