Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,470 Year: 3,727/9,624 Month: 598/974 Week: 211/276 Day: 51/34 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A Discussion of the Rationalization of Slavery
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 37 of 50 (546773)
02-13-2010 7:11 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by DevilsAdvocate
02-13-2010 6:26 PM


Buzsaw's Black Box
DevilsAdvocate writes:
I am not disputing this in anyway. What I am disputing is Buzz's justification that slavery was ok because the inflicted party:
a. inflicted slavery on other members of the same cultures (which is true of just about every race/ethnicity/culture on earth at one or more points in there history, but still does not make it justifiable)
b. they were endeared to there masters (yes Buzz actually said this)
c. benefited from slavery (???)
Makes one wonder if Buz or anyone of similar proclivities has the normal amount of empathy present in the average human being.
Buz may need some help in imagining a historic scenario, such as if he was captured by the Turks during the Barbary pirate days. No problem, I'm here to help.
Now Buz would have to admit the Turks had the right to enslave him because:
1) They did it to their 'own' people, particularly war captives, and showing they were not particularly racist against more northerly Europeans, often enslaved them as well.
2) Such enslavement may have endeared Buz to his Ottoman masters, after all they were, along with the Chinese, the most educated and sophisticated cultures on the planet until those evil European enlightenment figures institutionalized such decadent Western practices as democracy and science.
3) The benefits from such slavery would naturally extend to cultural, medical, and mathematical sophistication along with a greater degree of tolerance for other peoples who often found themselves in the same boat so to speak. Who knows, the captured ancestral Buz could mean the current Buz would be singing the praises of Allah at this moment. In fact I believe based upon his posts in support of fundamentalism, he would fit right in and perhaps with some luck and grit even become the Iranian Imam of his dreams.
Then again he could just wind up being a fish in a barrel.
Edited by anglagard, : replaced white with more northerly Europeans for sake of accuracy.

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 02-13-2010 6:26 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 44 of 50 (547076)
02-16-2010 3:19 AM
Reply to: Message 38 by onifre
02-15-2010 4:19 PM


A Different Environment Does Not Confer Ignorance
You need to read more, Mr. Perez.
I strongly suggest Guns, Germs, and Steel, after all it is only considered the top popular science book by those who responded to that question from Pharyngula, beating out even Godel, Escher Bach, a distant second.
If you are too busy to read the best pop-sci (and greatest history book IMO) you could always watch The Gods Must Be Crazy one and two.
After all, what is intelligence other than deeply and knowledgeably adapting to your environment.
Care to trade places? May be interesting to see how long you would last in New Guinea or the Kalahari.
Edited by anglagard, : correct mispelling and a bit more clarity

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by onifre, posted 02-15-2010 4:19 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by onifre, posted 02-16-2010 9:23 AM anglagard has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024