Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,334 Year: 3,591/9,624 Month: 462/974 Week: 75/276 Day: 3/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did God say it, or did you say it?
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 73 of 127 (549093)
03-03-2010 11:30 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Flyer75
03-03-2010 9:40 PM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
Flyer75 writes:
So you've spent this whole time telling all of us that YOM can mean other periods of time other then a literal day, which I didn't disagree with you on, yet you now want to claim without any proof that with CERTAINTY it means millions of years????? When it CAN mean a literal day also?
without any proof???
how long does it take for a diamond to form
how about coal?
How long does a landmass, covered in hot magna from an erupted volcano, take to re-vegetate?
How long does it take for the light from the sun to reach the earth?
could all this have really happened in 24hours? I think the evidence is fairly clear on that and therefore how could the Yom of Genesis be a 24 hour day??? It couldnt. So the logical interpretation of the account is that the Yom in this instance was a very long time, ages, eons, milleniums or simply... a very long Yom.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Flyer75, posted 03-03-2010 9:40 PM Flyer75 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by greyseal, posted 03-04-2010 3:13 AM Peg has replied
 Message 85 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 6:57 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 75 of 127 (549112)
03-04-2010 4:31 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by greyseal
03-04-2010 3:13 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
Greyseal writes:
So God in your opinion can't do anything supernatural, like, say, bringing the dead back to life? Or walking on water? Or making a bush burn without actually burning? Or turn water into wine or a staff into a snake?
Yes he can, but we are not talking about him manipulating physical laws, we are talking about him setting creation into motion.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by greyseal, posted 03-04-2010 3:13 AM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by greyseal, posted 03-04-2010 7:10 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 78 of 127 (549227)
03-05-2010 4:19 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by greyseal
03-04-2010 7:10 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
greyseal writes:
He can, but he didn't.
Well go ahead, shoot; why not?
For the same reason that when he impregnated Mary, he didnt make her istantly pregnant with a 9 month old fetus in her womb....which he could have done if he so desired, but he didnt, he chose to do it another way.
Its not for us to demand a reason why he does things a certain way, we should just be grateful that he does.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by greyseal, posted 03-04-2010 7:10 AM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by greyseal, posted 03-05-2010 9:58 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 81 of 127 (549283)
03-05-2010 2:53 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by greyseal
03-05-2010 9:58 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
greyseal writes:
I'm not going to argue the validity of picking the timeless version of "yom" because it would seem possible you could be right, but I still don't see the proof
the reason why i'm saying its not possible is becuase the proof that it was not done that way is all around us. The earth itself is the proof.
You know, when archeologists dig up artifacts from a site, they often say 'here is the proof that these people did this or that' .... the proof that the 'days' of genesis are much longer then 24 hours becaues the earth shows it to be.
Now you are right, I certainly do believe in the miracle of the bible, the manna, the red sea, the ark... and i believe these things because I believe that God has the power to manipulate physical laws...the laws that he created..when he wants to. But in the case of the genesis day, we have plenty of evidence that they were very long periods of time. The creation of physical things is not a miracle. It is a 'creation' It is the bringing together of physical matter whereas the miracles of the bible are the manipulation of that physical matter so that the laws that they are bound by are changed.
God can do both. He can create physical things and he can manipulate them.
greyseal writes:
the Truth isn't up to the democratic process besides, so you don't have to take my word for it, but it would seem you have YOUR interpretation and others have their own, with little but the loudness of voice of the participants to decide who is correct
Well i would have hoped that reason and logic would let the evidence decide...the evidence is an old earth. Therefore the Yom in this case must stand for a very long time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by greyseal, posted 03-05-2010 9:58 AM greyseal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Flyer75, posted 03-05-2010 5:55 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 83 of 127 (549344)
03-05-2010 11:55 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by Flyer75
03-05-2010 5:55 PM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
Flyer75 writes:
Reason and logic don't explain the virgin birth
Yes it does. Doctors perform their own virgin births every day. IVF...im sure you've heard of it. If we can impregnate a woman using a means other then sex, then so can God.
Flyer75 writes:
You use the analogy of the 9 month virgin birth yet you would have to agree that Adam didn't go through that...he was created full grown, not as an infant. Why could an all powerful God not create stars billions of years away with light already showing to earth???
the difference is that there was a 'need' to create adam instantly....tell me why an eternal God would need to create anything instantly...he has all the time in the world to do what he wants.
Why would he spend eons of time doing absolutely nothing, then suddenly in the blink of an eye make the physical creation appear?
the truth is that he spent eons of his time in a creative process rather then sitting around doing absolutely nothing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Flyer75, posted 03-05-2010 5:55 PM Flyer75 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by hooah212002, posted 03-06-2010 12:15 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 111 by greyseal, posted 03-13-2010 3:18 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 86 of 127 (549392)
03-06-2010 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by hERICtic
03-06-2010 6:57 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
hERICtic writes:
Again, the only reason its an "age" now, is bc science has determined the age of the earth, which contradicts scripture.
no, science has got nothing to do with the ancient hebrew language.
Science doesnt even have anything to do with the improved understanding of ancient languages. And its not out of harmony with scripture because the same word, Yom, is used throughout the hebrew scriptures and it is used in a wide variety of ways to express different lengths of time.
even in genesis it doesnt mean 24 hours.... it actually means 12 hours because only the light portion is called a Yom/day.
hERICtic writes:
Do you really think 200+ years ago most Christians believed that Genesis states it was billions of years?
200+ years ago, the ancient hebrew language was much less understood then it is today. Modern archeology and the study of linguistics is what has shed light on the real meaning behind the language. There are still some aspects of ancient hebrew that are not fully understood and im sure in coming years they will understand even more.
hERICtic writes:
How much more clear can evening, morning, first day. Evening, morning second day?
Each time evening/morning is used in scripture, it refers to a 24 hour day. Everytime a number and day are used together it refers to a 24 hour day.
thats rubbish, excuse my directness here, but if you count the hours from sunset/evening to the following sunrise/morning its only 12 hours.
If you want it to mean 24 hours, it should be reading as 'from evening to evening' dont you think?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 6:57 AM hERICtic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 6:19 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 88 of 127 (549397)
03-06-2010 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by hERICtic
03-06-2010 6:19 PM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
hERICtic writes:
EVERY time evening/morning is used, it refers to a 24 hour day. I didnt say it means 24 hours per se, but that it means a day, which consists of 24 hours.
Genesis 1:5 "and the Light he called day"
please dont tell me that the 'light' here means 24 hours.
You just said 'in EVERY instance'
well here is an instance where the 'light' as opposed to the 'darkness' is called 'day'
Obviously it is not in every instance, is it.
Now i'm going to put the figures down for you to count.
6pm beginning of evening
7pm
8pm
9pm
10pm
11pm
12am
1am
2am
3am
4am
5am
6am Morning
Add them up and tell me how many hours there are in a day from evening to morning...and if you can come up with 24 from that, your a bloody genius!
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 6:19 PM hERICtic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 7:23 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 90 of 127 (549403)
03-06-2010 7:58 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by hERICtic
03-06-2010 7:23 PM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
hERICtic writes:
In EVERY instance in scripture a number followed by YOM refers to a 24 hour period.
In EVERY instance in scripture, when evening and morning are used, it refers to a 24 hour period.
ok, so show me a few scriptures where this is the case.
hERICtic writes:
Jesus also stated a day has 12 hours. But obviously, Jesus knew it also included darkness before the next day. 24 hours.
so Jesus stated that a 'day' has 12 hours, but YOU say that he actually MEANT 24 hours. Right.
hERICtic writes:
God rested on the seventh day. Do you believe this seventh day was also an epoch? Adam lived past this day, just how old was he then? Or do you think the seventh day is back to a 24 hour period?
we are still in Gods 7th day.
Hebrews 4:9-11
There remains a sabbath resting for the people of God. For the man that has entered into God’s rest has also himself rested from his own works, just as God did from his own. Let us therefore do our utmost to enter into that rest.
Even moses words show that the seventh day was still in progress when the wrote genesis
Genesis 2:3 God proceeded to bless the seventh day and make it sacred, BECAUSE ON IT HE HAS BEEN RESTING from all his work that God has created for the purpose of making.
So if the 7th day is still going, then we know that the 7th day is so far 6,036 years in length. When will the 7th day end? Maybe after armageddon? Mabye after the 1,000 years of 'judgement day' has ended and Christ hands over the kingdom back to God?
BTW, if you add up the numbers in my previous post, you should have counted 12 of them. Im sure my math is not that bad.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by hERICtic, posted 03-06-2010 7:23 PM hERICtic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by hERICtic, posted 03-07-2010 6:54 AM Peg has replied
 Message 92 by AdminPD, posted 03-07-2010 8:59 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 95 of 127 (549449)
03-07-2010 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by hERICtic
03-07-2010 6:54 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
hERICtic writes:
2 Chronicles 13:11
Every morning and evening they present burnt offerings and fragrant incense to the LORD. They set out the bread on the ceremonially clean table and light the lamps on the gold lampstand every evening. We are observing the requirements of the LORD our God. But you have forsaken him.
and where is the word Yom in this verse? Also, if the offering is being made in the morning and again in the evening, this is within a 12 hour period.
with regard to trying to use any of the verses about morning and evening to prove that in genesis a day is only 24 hours is rediculous. Genesis is in a completely different context
hERICtic writes:
My challenge back to you: Find me an instance in scripture where evening/morning means long periods of time. Find me scripture where a number is given with a day that means long periods of time.
I have already done this many times. In msg 18 i listed 4 of them.
Msg 18 writes:
Isaiah 1:1 "The vision of Isaiah the son of A′moz that he visioned concerning Judah and Jerusalem in the DAYS (YOM) of Uz‧zi′ah, Jo′tham, A′haz [and] Hez‧e‧ki′ah, kings of Judah:
these days would amount to many more then 24hours because it is the whole lifetime of these people mentioned
Genesis 2:4: This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the DAY (YOM) that Jehovah God made earth and heaven.
here the entire creation of both the universe and the earth are called a day, this shows that Yom can be used for the whole period of time in which an extradorinary event took place
Genesis 1:4 "After that God saw that the light was good, and God brought about a division between the light and the darkness. 5 And God began calling the light DAY (YOM)"
here we see Yom is in reference to the light that is seen in the sky
Numbers 14:34 By the number of the DAYS (YOM) that YOU spied out the land, forty days, a day (YOM) for a year, a day for a year, YOU will answer for YOUR errors forty years"
in this verse we see that a YOM is equal to an entire year
hERICtic writes:
Which is my point. Either the seventh day is 24 hours, which shows the previous 6 were 24 hours, or god rested on the 7th day which is still going. In either case, his creation stopped on the sixth day.
well you completely missed that one, didnt you lol.
If the 7th day was still going when Moses wrote genesis, the day was already over 1000 years long.
If it was also still going when Paul told christians that they had the opportunity to 'enter into Gods Rest' then by the first century the day was now about 4,000 years in length
and if that rest day has not yet come to its end, the day is now over 6,000 years in length.
Here it is again: The 7th day has not yet ended. Do you understand that this shows that the genesis 'days' were of a very long duration???
hERICtic writes:
In either case, his creation stopped on the sixth day.
This contradicts the words of Jesus:
"But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female" (Mark 10:6).
According to Genesis, man was created on be the END of creation. If creation started billions the sixth day of six days. This wouldof years ago as per your version of Genesis, and day six is billions of years later....how can that be the beginning of creation???
Were Adam and Eve created at the same time? Was their creation simultaneous on the 6th day?
No it wasnt. Adam lived for an unspecified length of time before God created Eve. Adam was placed in the garden alone initially, he was given the task of naming all of the animals that God had created. Could he have named the many thousands, perhaps millions of animals, in one day? I dont think so.
Genesis 2 writes:
7And Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man came to be a living soul. 8Further, Jehovah God planted a garden in E′den, toward the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed. ...15And Jehovah God proceeded to take the man and settle him in the garden of E′den to cultivate it and to take care of it. 16And Jehovah God also laid this command upon the man: From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction. 17But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it you will positively die.
18And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going (future) to make a helper for him, as a complement of him.
19Now Jehovah God was forming from the ground every wild beast of the field and every flying creature of the heavens, and he began bringing them to the man to see what he would call each one; and whatever the man would call it, each living soul, that was its name. 20So the man was calling the names of all the domestic animals and of the flying creatures of the heavens and of every wild beast of the field, but for man there was found no helper as a complement of him. 21Hence Jehovah God had a deep sleep fall upon the man and, while he was sleeping, he took one of his ribs and then closed up the flesh over its place. 22And Jehovah God proceeded to build the rib that he had taken from the man into a woman and to bring her to the man
So the conclusion is that the 6th Yom was a very long period of time, long enough for Adam to live alone i the garden and name all of the animals. He could not have done this in less then 24 hours.
to AdminPD, this point is not off topic as its reasoning is linked to determining how long a day could be.
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by hERICtic, posted 03-07-2010 6:54 AM hERICtic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 8:21 AM Peg has replied
 Message 105 by hERICtic, posted 03-09-2010 6:56 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 98 of 127 (549547)
03-08-2010 5:45 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by purpledawn
03-08-2010 8:21 AM


Re: Address the Topic
Purpledawn writes:
It doesn't matter how long a day is. The point of the topic questions deal with how do you or teachers know what you are saying is correct or is what God meant?
but that was the question wasnt it. How do we know that God meant a very long time with this instance of the word Yom?
and a big part of being sure that you are on the right track is if your conclusion can be corroborated with many different parts of the bible
The story of Adam and Eve is a part of the genesis account and therefore it is still in harmony with the current questions about what a YOM means. If we are not allowed to speak about these things, how else can one determine if the conclusions are coming from God or not?
I believe that the bible does not contradict itself, so if we read that Adam lived for a length of time and had to name all of the animals, reason would tell us that it would have taken him more then a few hours to do this. It likely took him more then a few years to do this.
If it all happened on the 6th day, then it reasonable to conclude that the Yom in this instance spanned a period of time and not merely 24 hours. Thats how we can be sure that a yom is more then 24 hours.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 8:21 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 7:33 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 100 of 127 (549568)
03-08-2010 8:15 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by purpledawn
03-08-2010 7:33 PM


Re: Address the Topic
purpledawn writes:
We've seen people manage to corroborate many different views from various parts of the Bible. People are able to use the Bible to corroborate very differing ideas. How do you know that your conclusion is right and not totally out of line?
thats true, but only because a lot of verses are twisted to mean something they do not, they are often taken out of context, and many translators replace words that appear to fit with their theology over original word meanings. they also dont take the original word meanings into consideration.
the only way to be sure that a doctrine is correct is if it scriptures
1. Do not contradict other scriptures
2. are in harmony with Gods expressed will and purpose
3. are not taken out of context
4. use the correct meaning of the original hebrew and greek words. ie What they meant when they were written, not what the meaning later changed to.
purpledawn writes:
There's no way of knowing if the Priestly writer's creation story had the A&E story in mind when he wrote or if he had his own version of the story.
'his own version' does not compute.
God gave the message to the writers, they may have written in their own tongues, but it was God who was directing them to write. Sometimes they didnt understand it themselves which shows that it wasnt their own imaginations at work.
purpledawn writes:
Christian preachers teach all along that spectrum from your position to mine. How does any teacher know that their position is correct and they aren't just protecting their own dogma, tradition, or belief?
the scriptures reveal Gods intention, as soon as they deviate from the scriptures, they loose Gods intention.
As i said, a teaching must have the above 4 aspects if it is to be taken as truth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 7:33 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 9:01 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 102 of 127 (549582)
03-08-2010 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 101 by purpledawn
03-08-2010 9:01 PM


Re: Context or Not
purpledawn writes:
Other than when the writers say that God told them such and such, the writings do not support what you're saying. You have no way of knowing that God was directing all of them. That is your belief. All the authors do not tell us that they were directed by God.
under the same inspiration, paul wrote
"All scripture is inspired of God" 2 Timothy 3:16
in the words of the prophets over and over we read
"And the word of Jehovah came to me" and besides that we see a multitude of passages where God is the one speaking.
purpledawn writes:
You say the authors sometimes didn't understand what they wrote. I disagree with that. I feel all the authors and their audiences knew what was being said otherwise the writings were useless.
IMO, the idea that they didn't understand what they wrote or that their audience didn't understand what was said or written is an apologetic defense of doctrine.
far from it.
Daniel 12:4-9 4And as for you, O Daniel, make secret the words and seal up the book, until the time of [the] end. Many will rove about, and the [true] knowledge will become abundant.
8Now as for me, I heard, but I could not understand; so that I said: O my lord, what will be the final part of these things?
9And he went on to say: Go, Daniel, because the words are made secret and sealed up until the time of [the] end.
Did Daniel understand the prophecy he had written. No, he clearly stated as much.
purpledawn writes:
Except that we both can claim to fit the 4 aspects, but we have very different views. So which one of us is right?
i would challenge you to present a doctrine which you believe to fit all 4 aspects so we can test it. personally i believe that if one of 4 fails, then so does the doctrine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by purpledawn, posted 03-08-2010 9:01 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by killinghurts, posted 03-08-2010 10:44 PM Peg has replied
 Message 106 by purpledawn, posted 03-09-2010 9:22 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 112 by Kapyong, posted 03-13-2010 4:25 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 104 of 127 (549599)
03-09-2010 3:25 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by killinghurts
03-08-2010 10:44 PM


Re: Context or Not
killinghurts writes:
So how do we now claim to fully understand what was meant as opposed to think we understand what was meant?
'We' dont.
God has shed light on his will to a selected few just as he did in ancient times thru ones such as Noah, Moses, the kings & the Prophets.... and as he did 2,000 years ago thru Jesus and the early christians.
'we' dont all simply understand the scriptures due to our own knowledge and reasoning abilities. Understanding comes thru the channel God chooses, always has and always will.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by killinghurts, posted 03-08-2010 10:44 PM killinghurts has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by killinghurts, posted 03-14-2010 9:09 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 108 of 127 (549717)
03-10-2010 2:10 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by hERICtic
03-09-2010 6:56 AM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
hERICtic writes:
Unless I misspoke, I stated that any time evening and morning are used, it refers to a day was we know it. I'm not sure how your "12" hour reference helps your case whatsover. Its even less time than what I claim. Its would still be 6 increments of daylight as per Genesis when the world was created. But as I have shown you, "day" can mean daylight or 24 hours.
because from 6pm - 6am (evening to morning or morning to evening) the number of hours are only 12.
For some reason you are still counting them as 24. How do you get 24???
If the genesis account says 'and their came to be evening and morning a 1st/2nd/3rd day' then what happened to the other 12 hours of each of these days? They've gone missing becaues the text doesnt say there came to be 'evening and evening' which would be 24 hours...it says 'evening & morning' which is only 12 hours.
IOW, the 'day' in genesis is not a literal 24 hours as you keep trying to assert.
hERICtic writes:
Only to you. You need it to be. The point is EVERY time evening and morning are mentioned, it refers to a day as we know it.
the Yom does not have to mean 24 hours though. Genesis itself shows this. you said that my question about eve being created on the same day as adam was moot, but in fact it is not.
The story implies that Adam lived for a length of time before eve was created...yet she was also created on the 6th day. So how can this be? If he lived alone for long enough to name all the animals and begin to feel lonely, surely this was longer then a few hours. This must have been several years at least.
but it was still on the 6th day. Obviously the story implies that the 6th day was much longer then 24hours.
hERICtic writes:
If the days were billions of years, then Adam and Eve were created at the END of creation. Scripture states the beginning.
This contradicts the words of Jesus:
"But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female" (Mark 10:6).
you have taken Jesus out of context here. The beginning of creation was the universe, the planets and stars ,also the only begotten son and the angels... not adam and eve. So you've simply misread this verse. Jesus is not saying that the very first thing God created was Adam and Eve...even the genesis account does not say this, so you are contradicting genesis which means you've got the wrong interpretation of Jesus words. Really he is just refering to the human creation here, nothing more.
You could read it like this
"From the beginning of mankinds creation, he made them male and female"
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message by continuing in this vein.
AdminPD
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by hERICtic, posted 03-09-2010 6:56 AM hERICtic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by hERICtic, posted 03-10-2010 7:14 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 113 of 127 (550225)
03-13-2010 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by greyseal
03-13-2010 3:18 PM


Re: actually...it's not that simple
greyseal writes:
Peg, umm...did you mean to say two wildly contradicting things in the same paragraph, one sentence after another?
i know that looks contradictory, but in the context of the discussion, its not really.
The universe is not a living creature like Adam (and i'll include the animal creation here too)
The universe could have been created slowly over time becaues its simply the bringing together to matter. But, unless you believe God used evolution, how could he have done so with living creatures considering living creatures require all their parts to be working for life to exist. This is why I said that he must have created Adam instantaneously, but the universe and the earth over long periods of time.
btw, this is just my own opinion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by greyseal, posted 03-13-2010 3:18 PM greyseal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by greyseal, posted 03-16-2010 8:40 AM Peg has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024