Taz writes:
Buzsaw has been using this argument against GW for years. I've been dismissing it as just his ramblings. I had no idea that there are honest to god those out there who actually buy this crap of an argument by the masses.
Taz, are you unaware that Buz is a global warmist? Yah, I've stated here on this board that there will, according to the Biblical record be a an eventual aggregate (I say aggragate) of global warming to the extent of evaporation of much of the oceans, the drying of many rivers, extensive drout and much more.
My position is that CO2 will be part of this but the sun will effect the more significant share of it.
The
fat lady hasn't sang on all of the ramifications of this issue as well as the global warming debate.
As I see it, yes, there will be some negative aspects of global warming, but the designer has so wonderfully designed the eco systems of the planet that after
the fat lady sings, when the eco system corrects and adjusts, the prophesied
plowman will overtake the reaper millenium will be realized.
Heck, man, if you people think that premordial soup can progress into all of the complexity of life that we have today and that an expansion of mindless energy can effect itself into the universe we live in, certainly a CO2 problem will be no biggie for the eco system to handle, with or without direct design; perhaps some of each.
As for the flood, the big problem I have is how to refute dating methodology relative to whatever pre-flood planet there may have been if indeed there was a global flood as per the Biblical record. I believe it will eventually effectively and sensibly refuted, but I'm not there yet - still thinking and reading on that.
For me, there's just too much corroborating evidence for the credibility of the Biblical record to convince me that the flood account is mythical.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.
™ Version 4.2
