Hi Rahvin,
Thanks for this very clear explanation and I actually was looking for a new book to read so I may check it out.
First, I get the overall meaning of what you're trying to explain in this thread. My issue I guess is with the author's use of the term "subconscious" - it seems to be very misleading. He seems to be using the term to indicate
another consciousness seperate (sub) from normal consciousness. An
area in the brain that has instincts, urges, desires and thoughts - that can make decisions or feel things - when that is not the case at all. And if that's what he/she is claiming, then I feel he/she is making some very false and unevidenced assertions.
Maybe I'm reading too deep into it, but for example:
Rahvin writes:
The unconscious or subconscious mind in the context I'm using it is simply that part of the brain that functions based on instinct without our awareness of why it makes the judgments it does.
But this is the function of the
whole brain, there is no seperation. Insticts and urges are chemical reactions to stimuli, not subconscious decision making.
I hope I'm making sense?
However, there is a part of our brains that gives us our initial emotional "feeling" towards any given situation.
Do you have evidence to support that? Because what you are describing is a part of our brain that gives us "qualia" - an area that gives us our subjective experiences.
And more to the topic of this thread, it's the source of appeals to emotion. When someone argues that x is true because x is personally preferable to them, that's their "gut" telling them that x is more likely to be true.
Yeah, I agree. Every single sentient being, I would guess, experiences reality in this way, subjectively.
And the Mindless Middle is nothing more than an appeal to emotion - the basic desire to be "fair" to all "sides," creating an illusion of objectivity without actually engaging any analysis of fact.
I know lots of people like this, and I actually envy it to an extent. Outside of debate, or a debate forum like this one, this "mindless middle" seems like the less stressful way of dealing with things - just not give a shit, and giving both sides equal relevance. I personally can't be that way - I guess I'm wired to object and argue - but I can see how it's an appealing position to take.
- Oni