Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,397 Year: 3,654/9,624 Month: 525/974 Week: 138/276 Day: 12/23 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

abiogenesis

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   abiogenesis
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 144 of 297 (548524)
02-27-2010 11:19 PM 		Reply to: Message 141 by marc9000
02-27-2010 8:06 PM

Re: Level ONE comparison: abiogenesis yes, ID unknown
Naturalism is treated in science as an absolute truth,
​
Nothing is treated as absolute truth in science. If there was anything that was considered absolute truth, then the research into that study would cease, and would then be as religion that is dogma.
Science deals in searching for truth and ammending that which has been falsified. Dogma cannot be falsified.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by marc9000, posted 02-27-2010 8:06 PM marc9000 has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by marc9000, posted 03-10-2010 9:00 PM bluescat48 has not replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 181 of 297 (549871)
03-11-2010 8:20 AM 		Reply to: Message 161 by marc9000
03-10-2010 9:15 PM

Re: Theistic science?
Science that disregards religion completely is what students are being taught. Miller writes it exactly the same way an atheist would. He doesn’t avoid religion as he should, he makes positive assertions about nature (including abiogenesis) that contradict it.
​
Science is without religion. Science and religion mix as well as oil & water. They are 2 different things. Science deals with reality, religion with the supernatural. They are mutually exclusive. Science with religion is not science.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by marc9000, posted 03-10-2010 9:15 PM marc9000 has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by marc9000, posted 03-21-2010 4:26 PM bluescat48 has replied
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4210 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Normal Thread Display
Message 204 of 297 (551217)
03-21-2010 11:05 PM 		Reply to: Message 190 by marc9000
03-21-2010 4:26 PM

Re: Theistic science?
Science is WITH religion, when it tries to challenge it, oppose it, replace it.
​
Except that science is not challenging religion, only in the minds of fundies does one see any conflict or challenge, and that from the religion side. Moderate theists don't.
​
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
​
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
​
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008
This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by marc9000, posted 03-21-2010 4:26 PM marc9000 has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024