Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The "Liberal" Media
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2317 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 106 of 165 (554602)
04-09-2010 8:22 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by Theodoric
04-09-2010 8:13 AM


Re: Liberal media at work again
Also, speaking as a Dutchie here, most Dutch priest are among the most liberal priests there are (there are , of course, exceptions). So this also must have fed his liberal nazi communism!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Theodoric, posted 04-09-2010 8:13 AM Theodoric has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 107 of 165 (554604)
04-09-2010 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Faith
04-06-2010 7:22 PM


Re: WOW!!!
Obama isn't a practicing Muslim but he did grow up with a lot of Muslim influence in his family and he did go to a Muslim school for a while as a child. That's no problem in itself except that he has seemed to want to deny ANY such Muslim background at all in some contexts. But then you can find him talking about it on some You Tube videos if you go look, not that he IS a Muslim but that he certainly had a Muslim family and experience in a Muslim community in Kenya. You can also find him speaking Arabic and quoting Muslim sayings with obvious personal experience of their milieu.
Obama's estranged father was raised in a Muslim household, but renounced it early in life and became an atheist. Obama met his own father maybe three times in his entire life! In other words, his dad was a piece of shit because he's was a dead beat.
One could make a stronger case about why Obama tends to be afrocentric when his own African father left him high and dry, or why he identifies strongly as being "black" when he was raised only by his white mother and grandmother, whom he uncerimoniously threw under the bus during the last election cycle as being "a typical white person" (whatever that means).
There is no Muslim influence. That he bombs soveriegn nations like Pakistan, which the US is not at war with, makes an even stronger case for his disassociation with the Muslim world.
Obama is a lot of things that people could legitimately criticize: Leftist, afrocentrist, etc, but Muslim doesn't seem to be one of them.

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners." -- Charlton Heston

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 04-06-2010 7:22 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 8:36 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2972 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 108 of 165 (554654)
04-09-2010 12:54 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Faith
04-06-2010 7:22 PM


Re: WOW!!!
That's no problem in itself except that he has seemed to want to deny ANY such Muslim background at all in some contexts.
I know right? With a society such as ours that's so accepting of peoples differences, it's a wonder why he would try to disassociate himself from the gentle religion of Islam. (Even though he's not since he wrote a book about it!!!)
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 04-06-2010 7:22 PM Faith has not replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10043
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 109 of 165 (554704)
04-09-2010 3:51 PM


The recent nuclear arms treaty with Russia is getting Fox all in a twitter. The treaty states that the US will not bomb a non-nuclear country, nor threaten the use of nuclear arms. Hannity and Gingrich are claiming that this treaty will prevent us from retaliating against a biochemical attack with nuclear weapons, or from nuking Iran. Both claims are the exact opposite of what is found in the treaty. The treaty clearly states that the US can opt out of the agreement if they are attacked with biochemical weapons of mass destruction, and the agreement does not extend to countries who are in violation or not a part of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Leave it to Fox to report the exact opposite of reality when it comes to Obama.

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 8:56 AM Taq has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 110 of 165 (554796)
04-10-2010 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by Hyroglyphx
04-09-2010 8:37 AM


Re: WOW!!!
There is no Muslim influence. That he bombs soveriegn nations like Pakistan, which the US is not at war with, makes an even stronger case for his disassociation with the Muslim world.
We have agreements with Afghanistan and Pakistan governments to conduct surgical missile strikes (not bombs) into Pakistan to route out the Taliban and Al-Queda insurgents. These strikes have been conducted before Obama came into office. Why is this so hard to understand.
Sorry back to the topic, you are correct Hyro that Obama is not a Muslim, nor was he ever a Muslim. He was a practicing Christian who attended the Trinity United Church of Christ (close in theology and social policy to the Luthern and Episcopalian Churches) for over 20 years. You can debate whether he was a real 'Christian' ('no true Scotsman' fallicy), I could care less since I am not one. However he has always considered himself to be a Christian since early in his adult life and he married a Christian woman, Michelle Obama.
Obama was raised in a non-religious home by his mother who was skeptical of organized religion. She definately was not a Muslim and neither was his birth father (whom was raised as a Muslim early in life but stoped practicing and became a non-religious and agnostic/atheist). His mother considered herself an academic, humanist and progressive in her thinking and was most likely an atheist or at best an agnostic or theist (but not a Christian).
She did later marry an Indonesian, Lolo Soetro, who was studying abroad at the University of Hawaii and though was a a practicing Muslim was not devote (considering for one that he married a non-Muslim and Caucasian woman), tolerant of other religionsand certainly not a radical fundamentalist . Lolo, was well educated (had a Masters Degree in Geology) and worked for the Indonesian government and Mobil Oil as a professional geologist. Barack Obama and his family moved to Indonesia for a little under 5 years and he studied his first three years at a Catholic school in Jakarta and one year at a state run school (not a madrassa). This prestigious state-run school was founded by the Dutch colonial government in 1934 and taught students of many different religions and backgrounds. He was also involved in Boy Scouts (equivalent of our Cub Scouts in the USA) while he lived in Indonesia.
Also found this interesting about the state-run school that some American's called a 'Muslim madrassa' that he attended:
Bandung Winardijanto, a former classmate writes:
The girls wore miniskirts. There's no way miniskirts would be allowed at a madrassa," he said. Another photo of teachers at the school shows both males and females wearing Western-style clothing. The women are also wearing miniskirts.
This is what Obama wrote about his mother's religious views in 'Audacity of Hope' written by then Senator Obama in early 2006:
Barak Obama writes:
I was not raised in a religious household. For my mother, organized religion too often dressed up closed-mindedness in the garb of piety, cruelty and oppression in the cloak of righteousness. However, in her mind, a working knowledge of the world's great religions was a necessary part of any well-rounded education. In our household the Bible, the Koran, and the Bhagavad Gita sat on the shelf alongside books of Greek and Norse and African mythology.
On Easter or Christmas Day my mother might drag me to church, just as she dragged me to the Buddhist temple, the Chinese New Year celebration, the Shinto shrine, and ancient Hawaiian burial sites.In sum, my mother viewed religion through the eyes of the anthropologist; it was a phenomenon to be treated with a suitable respect, but with a suitable detachment as well.
So at best you could say his mother had a typical academial Anthropological pan-religion worldview tolerant though not tied to any one religious view (which is similar to my own view about religion).
Hope this gives some insight to Barak Obama's religious background and dispels the ridiculous myths that he is a Muslim.
Also this is what Barak Obama himself said in a 2007 interview:
My father was from Kenya and a lot of people in his village were Muslim. He didn’t practice Islam. Truth is he wasn’t very religious. He met my mother. My mother was a Christian from Kansas, and they married and then divorced. I was raised by my mother. So, I’ve always been a Christian. The only connection I’ve had to Islam is that my grandfather on my father’s side came from that country. But I’ve never practiced Islam.
Barak Obama was raised by his grandparents in Honolulu, HI since he was 10 years old. Her grandparents were Jewish by birth but they attended Methodist and Unitarian Churches when Barak lived with them.
More insight in his Christian born-again experience from Chicago New-Times article from April 5, 2004 when he was still an Illinoise State Senator: Obama: I have a deep faith: Barack Obama credits his multicultural upbringing for his theological point of view. :
"Alongside my own deep personal faith, I am a follower, as well, of our civic religion," he says. "I am a big believer in the separation of church and state. I am a big believer in our constitutional structure. I mean, I'm a law professor at the University of Chicago teaching constitutional law.
"I am a great admirer of our founding charter and its resolve to prevent theocracies from forming and its resolve to prevent disruptive strains of fundamentalism from taking root in this country.
"I think there is an enormous danger on the part of public figures to rationalize or justify their actions by claiming God's mandate. I don't think it's healthy for public figures to wear religion on their sleeve as a means to insulate themselves from criticism, or dialogue with people who disagree with them."
Still, Obama is unapologetic in saying he has a "personal relationship with Jesus Christ." As a sign of that relationship, he says, he walked down the aisle of Chicago's Trinity United Church of Christ in response to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright's altar call one Sunday morning about 16 years ago.
The politician could have ended his spiritual tale right there, at the point some people might assume his life changed, when he got "saved," transformed, washed in the blood. But Obama wants to clarify what truly happened.
"It wasn't an epiphany," he says of that public profession of faith. "It was much more of a gradual process for me. I know there are some people who fall out. Which is wonderful. God bless them.... I think it was just a moment to certify or publicly affirm a growing faith in me."
These days, he says, he attends the 11 a.m. Sunday service at Trinity in the Brainerd neighborhood every week -- or at least as many weeks as he is able. His pastor, Wright, has become a close confidant.
So how did he become a churchgoer?
It began in 1985, when he came to Chicago as a $13,000-a-year community organizer, working with a number of African-American churches in the Roseland, West Pullman and Altgeld Gardens neighborhoods that were trying to deal with the devastation caused by shuttered steel plants.
"I started working with both the ministers and the lay people in these churches on issues like creating job-training programs, or after-school programs for youth, or making sure that city services were fairly allocated to underserved communities," he says. "And it was in those places where I think what had been more of an intellectual view of religion deepened.
"I became much more familiar with the ongoing tradition of the historic black church and its importance in the community. And the power of that culture to give people strength in very difficult circumstances, and the power of that church to give people courage against great odds. And it moved me deeply."
Obama says he reads the Bible, though not as regularly as he'd like, now that he's on the campaign trail. But he does find time to pray.
"It's not formal, me getting on my knees," he says. "I think I have an ongoing conversation with God.... I'm constantly asking myself questions about what I'm doing, why I am doing it.
"The biggest challenge, I think, is always maintaining your moral compass."
Friends and advisers, such as the Rev. Michael Pfleger, pastor of St. Sabina Roman Catholic Church in the Auburn- Gresham community on the South Side, who has known Obama for the better part of 20 years, help him keep that compass set, he says.
"I always have felt in him this consciousness that, at the end of the day, with all of us, you've got to face God," Pfleger says of Obama. "Faith is key to his life, no question about it. It is central to who he is, and not just in his work in the political field, but as a man, as a black man, as a husband, as a father.... I don't think he could easily divorce his faith from who he is."
Another person Obama says he seeks out for spiritual counsel is state Sen. James Meeks, who is also the pastor of Chicago's Salem Baptist Church. The day after Obama won the primary in March, he stopped by Salem for Wednesday-night Bible study.
"I know that he's a person of prayer," Meeks says. "The night after the election, he was the hottest thing going from Galesburg to Rockford. He did all the TV shows, and all the morning news, but his last stop at night was for church. He came by to say thank you, and he came by for prayer."
Obama admits it's not easy for politicians to talk about faith.
"Part of the reason I think it's always difficult for public figures to talk about this is that the nature of politics is that you want to have everybody like you and project the best possible traits onto you," he says. "Oftentimes, that's by being as vague as possible, or appealing to the lowest common denominators. The more specific and detailed you are on issues as personal and fundamental as your faith, the more potentially dangerous it is.
Hope this sheds some light. Obama is a self-ascribed Christian in his theology not a Muslim.
That does not mean I agree with his theology or his associations, I am just trying to dispel the ridiculous myth that he is a closet Muslim.
Liberal Christian, progressive liberal and non-fundamentalist- yes.
Practicing or closet Muslim- no.
Facts don't lie.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-09-2010 8:37 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-10-2010 9:20 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 111 of 165 (554798)
04-10-2010 8:56 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Taq
04-09-2010 3:51 PM


Leave it to Fox to report the exact opposite of reality when it comes to Obama.
Fox news is run by the bottom half of the gene pool in my opinion. It would be interesting if ran IQ tests on all the news agencies and political pundants (including Hannity, Rush Loudmouth, and others) and see what the results are.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Taq, posted 04-09-2010 3:51 PM Taq has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Taq, posted 04-10-2010 9:29 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 165 (554802)
04-10-2010 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by DevilsAdvocate
04-10-2010 8:36 AM


Re: WOW!!!
We have agreements with Afghanistan and Pakistan governments to conduct surgical missile strikes (not bombs)
I use "bombing" colloquially. This was a surgical strike too, but it doesn't make it just.
I also find it very ironic that when Bush was in office, damn near all democrats were critical of the war. Now that Obama is in office, there seems to be a strange silence on the issue of him taking up the Bush doctrine. I would really like to know why this is.
These strikes have been conducted before Obama came into office. Why is this so hard to understand.
I don't know why it is difficult for Faith to understand that Obama is not a muslim. He is many things, muslim not being one of them.
He was a practicing Christian who attended the Trinity United Church of Christ (close in theology and social policy to the Luthern and Episcopalian Churches) for over 20 years. You can debate whether he was a real 'Christian'
All I care about is Trinity United is that it is a crazy church, with nut-jobs in it.
Hope this gives some insight to Barak Obama's religious background and dispels the ridiculous myths that he is a Muslim.
Post that for Faith. What's more, Obama Sr, after leaving Barack's mother, went on to marry a Jewish woman which even further dispels the notion that he was intolerant Muslim. He was a derelict and abusive father, yes, but not a Muslim.

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners." -- Charlton Heston

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 8:36 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 9:42 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Taq
Member
Posts: 10043
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 113 of 165 (554803)
04-10-2010 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by DevilsAdvocate
04-10-2010 8:56 AM


Fox news is run by the bottom half of the gene pool in my opinion. It would be interesting if ran IQ tests on all the news agencies and political pundants (including Hannity, Rush Loudmouth, and others) and see what the results are.
Actually, I would expect that the more famous pundits on Fox have high IQ's. Do you really think that someone with a low IQ would be able to manipulate that many viewers?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 8:56 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 9:36 AM Taq has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 114 of 165 (554805)
04-10-2010 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Faith
04-06-2010 7:22 PM


Re: WOW!!!
Watch these Faith, and hopefully it will provide some insight into Obama's early life.
also
Obama's Kenyan Roots
and
Obama's Village - Kenya
Barak Obama never denied his family history or that some of his family were/are Muslims (though much of his father's family is Christian not Muslim). All he said is that he was not nor never a practicing Muslim. Occasionally stepping foot in a Mosque as a child does not make you a Muslim any more than stepping foot in a church a church makes you a Christian.
Also, Barak Obama never lived in Kenya and his first visit to his father's family in Kenya was not until 1987 when he was 26 years old. Besides, Kenya is a mix of religious influences and the only church in his village is a Christian church not a mosque. His family there, aunts, uncles, etc are a mix of Christians and Muslims. Barak's grandfather was a convert to Islam from Roman Catholism however Barak's father became an atheist as a young man. So the basic gist is that if he is a Muslim by his family associations, by the same token, he is a Christian by family associations.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Faith, posted 04-06-2010 7:22 PM Faith has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 115 of 165 (554806)
04-10-2010 9:36 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by Taq
04-10-2010 9:29 AM


Actually, I would expect that the more famous pundits on Fox have high IQ's. Do you really think that someone with a low IQ would be able to manipulate that many viewers?
I was being sarcastic and not totally serious. Sorry my bitterness came out. You are probably right. However, high IQ does not = ethical moral behavior.
Edited by DevilsAdvocate, : No reason given.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Taq, posted 04-10-2010 9:29 AM Taq has not replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 116 of 165 (554807)
04-10-2010 9:42 AM
Reply to: Message 112 by Hyroglyphx
04-10-2010 9:20 AM


Re: WOW!!!
I use "bombing" colloquially. This was a surgical strike too, but it doesn't make it just.
True. But do you think we are just arbritarliy killing people indiscrinately?
I also find it very ironic that when Bush was in office, damn near all democrats were critical of the war.
Most of them (me included) were critical of the war with Iraq not routing out Al-Queda in Afghanistan after 9/11.
Now that Obama is in office, there seems to be a strange silence on the issue of him taking up the Bush doctrine. I would really like to know why this is.
So you think a 100% pull out at this time would solve all the problems over there? Let the Taliban and Al-Queda take Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan back over?
What is your solution?
I don't know why it is difficult for Faith to understand that Obama is not a muslim. He is many things, muslim not being one of them.
Agreed.
Post that for Faith. What's more, Obama Sr, after leaving Barack's mother, went on to marry a Jewish woman which even further dispels the notion that he was intolerant Muslim. He was a derelict and abusive father, yes, but not a Muslim
I don't know if he was abusive (physically? psychologically probably). Derelict yes.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 112 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-10-2010 9:20 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by DC85, posted 04-10-2010 11:15 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied
 Message 118 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-10-2010 12:58 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
DC85
Member
Posts: 876
From: Richmond, Virginia USA
Joined: 05-06-2003


Message 117 of 165 (554822)
04-10-2010 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 116 by DevilsAdvocate
04-10-2010 9:42 AM


Re: WOW!!!
So you think a 100% pull out at this time would solve all the problems over there? Let the Taliban and Al-Queda take Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan back over?
What is your solution?
What have we really done about it other then enrage the other side of the conflict? All-Queda is growing and spreading to other parts of the world... It's deemed as a Holy War they deem as absolute God inspired law. Reasoning with most of them will be like reasoning with many of the creationists we get one this board. They deal in Absolutes. Al-Queda isn't a Government force we can fight and over power like the Nazi's of Germany. It's everywhere.
We are off topic yet again....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 9:42 AM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 118 of 165 (554841)
04-10-2010 12:58 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by DevilsAdvocate
04-10-2010 9:42 AM


Re: WOW!!!
True. But do you think we are just arbritarliy killing people indiscrinately?
No, I don't believe that is official US policy, but it does happen, as demonstrated by the video leak.
The point is that the War on Terror is about as effective as the War on Drugs. While you make small gains, the overall prognosis is bleak.
But that is an entirely other topic altogether.
Most of them (me included) were critical of the war with Iraq not routing out Al-Queda in Afghanistan after 9/11.
Historically I was not against the war in Afghanistan, but recently I have been questioning what it has produced and what it is intended to produce. What has been gained from it? If you can't answer that effectively, then you have to question whether it is an enormous waste of time and a waste of lives and a waste of money.
At the very least, tell me what the objective is. What is the function of the war(s)?
So you think a 100% pull out at this time would solve all the problems over there? Let the Taliban and Al-Queda take Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan back over?
That's what has happened regardless. Iraq and Afghanistan are still, nearly a decade later, too inept to stand under their own recognizance, corruption is rampant, stealing elections, theft of US aid supposed to be going to their infrastructure stolen. And what has it produced? Do we have bin Laden? Is the Taliban going away? Is Al Qaeda going away? No, it's endless. Are our policies creating them faster than we can kill them?
One has to question that.
What is your solution?
There is no solution to Afghanistan that Americans can figure out for Afghani's. We're criticized as being the nosy police of the world. So let the world deal with their affairs, and we will focus on guarding America from foreign incursion.
The belief that we're somehow going to kill all the terrorists so that they'll never come back here is a naive fantasy. There is not a specific number of them, as they're being manufactured in madrassas, partly due to their religion, partly due to their customs, partly due to their lack of secular education, partly due to Western policies. The floodgate has been open. We will not live in the same safety we once had. Those days are now over, so we have to focus on better homeland security.
I don't know if he was abusive (physically? psychologically probably). Derelict yes.
It's not widely known, but even Barack corroborated it.

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners." -- Charlton Heston

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 9:42 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 10:32 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
DevilsAdvocate
Member (Idle past 3123 days)
Posts: 1548
Joined: 06-05-2008


Message 119 of 165 (554930)
04-10-2010 10:32 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Hyroglyphx
04-10-2010 12:58 PM


Re: WOW!!!
No, I don't believe that is official US policy, but it does happen, as demonstrated by the video leak.
One group of bad apples does not make the entire basket bad. Stereotyping is wrong whether it be racial or occupational (in this case the military). I will have to investigate this video and its background a little more closely before commenting or making a judgement call. Will get back to you on this one.
The point is that the War on Terror is about as effective as the War on Drugs. While you make small gains, the overall prognosis is bleak.
The prognosis for winning WWII was pretty bleak as well. Or as General Sherman said: "War is hell". Even General Eisenhower realized the futility as well as the neccessity of war in certain circumstances:
President and General Dwight D. Eisenhower writes:
I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity.
also
President and General Dwight D. Eisenhower writes:
When people speak to you about a preventive war, you tell them to go and fight it. After my experience, I have come to hate war. War settles nothing.
I think Kennedy said it best though:
President John F. Kennedy writes:
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
I agree with all the quotes above and I believe only someone in the military and who has experienced real warfare as all the above people have really understand the futility and the neccessity of war.
Yes, I agree that the prognosis is bleak. However, are we to hunker down and just wait for another 9/11 to occur? Yes, our very presence in the Middle East is creating what the CIA refers to as 'blowback' but what is our alternative? We are damned if we do, and damned if we don't.
As an active duty military person and soon to be commissioned officer myself, as well as being a humanist and ethically bound person, I feel it is because of incidents like Abu Ghraib, the My Lai Massacre, and other attrocities that we need strong, moral people to lead our military and to ensure incidents like these do not happen. War is hell, but until all people can live in peace and harmony, it is a necessary evil.
Historically I was not against the war in Afghanistan, but recently I have been questioning what it has produced and what it is intended to produce. What has been gained from it?
What was gained during the first year of WWII? Not a whole lot. The prognosis was grim and our young boys of America were dying left and right with very little head way in the Pacific, North Africa and Italy.
Again we are not invading Afghanistan. The government there supports are effort to route out the Taliban and Al Queda. Will it take time? Of course. But was is our alternative plan? What do you think will happen if we pull out completely tomorrow?
What is the function of the war(s)?
I already said what the function of the war in Afghanistan is. Basically it is to take out key positions in the Taliban and Al-Queda and to quell them enough for the national Afghanee military to take over just as we are doing in Iraq.
Will we be successful? Who knows the future. But should we withdrawel and let the Taliban take Afghanistan back over and provide a safe haven again for Al Queda, thus basically making our efforts over and the American lives killed there null and void?
Do we have bin Laden? Is the Taliban going away? Is Al Qaeda going away? No, it's endless. Are our policies creating them faster than we can kill them?
There is no solution to Afghanistan that Americans can figure out for Afghani's. We're criticized as being the nosy police of the world. So let the world deal with their affairs, and we will focus on guarding America from foreign incursion.
I agree the policy to go into Iraq instead of concentrating on Al Queda in Afghanistan was astoundingly stupid IMHO. We did more harm than good. Even GWB father didn't think it was a good idea. Strategically and tactically it was an epic fail. Did some good come out of it? Yes, a dictator regime was toupled, but at what cost.
However, hind sight is 20/20. The question is what do we do now. Immediately pulling out of Afghanistan is not a good strategic or tactical move. Our very presence there is keeping the Taliban from regrouping. As far as Al Queda, we are keeping them on the defensive for the moment. It is hard to plan attacks when the US military is killing off your most experienced leaders. Even though Bin Laden is still at large we have decapitated some of the highest leaders in his group. He also no longer has the capitol that he once had to fund his terrorist acts, especially by keeping the Taliban from the Opium fields. This is now just a battle of attrition and whittling down the enemy. The real question, just like with Vietnam, is how long can the American public support our forces there. The difference with this and Vietnam is that the Vietnamese never committed terrorist acts in the US homeland, whereas Al Queda certainly will.
Myself, I would rather keep the fight over there than having them regroup and attempt another 9/11 attack here. Yes, there have been some attempts to restage 9/11 with the Christmas day bomber but they did not have the know-how, backing and well planned out stategy of multi-prong attacks that the original 9/11 attacks had.
The belief that we're somehow going to kill all the terrorists so that they'll never come back here is a naive fantasy.
No intelligent military planer is saying this. The objective is not to kill every terrorist. That is a known impossibility. I agree that blowback is creating more fodder for the Al Queda terrorist machine. What we need to do to counter that is to assist Afghanistan to help educate its people. No I am not talking about colonialization, I am talking about teaching there people that real Islam does not preach killing women and children (nowhere does it say this in the Koran). If they can regain ground educationally from the extremists than I think that would be the most effective course of actions. At the same time we can slowly withdrawel once the Afghan military and police force are effective in duking it out with the Taliban and keeping them in check.
Military is not the only option, diplomacy is not the only option, education is not the only option. All three need to be delicately balanced and utilized to try to regain control in Afghanistan and other areas of the world with pockets of extremists. I do not believe a Monroe doctinest type of approach will keep the terrorists away though I do believe the less presence we have over there once we can effectively pull back the better. Perceived American imperialism and military unilateralism has done much damage and has effectively weakened out international backing resulting in the cluster-fuck we are experiencing over there. It will take time and patience to unfuck ourselves, however 100% withdrawel is not an option either.
Sorry, didn't mean to take this much time explaining this but I think both sides think to simplistically in there offers of solutions. This is not a simple problem and as a result will not be resolved by a simple solution.
It's not widely known, but even Barack corroborated it.
Ok, I was just making the statement that after the age of 2 he hardly ever saw his father so I don't think his father had much influence on him even if he was abusive. Moot point.

One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep seated need to believe." - Carl Sagan
"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-10-2010 12:58 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-11-2010 10:16 AM DevilsAdvocate has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 165 (554981)
04-11-2010 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 119 by DevilsAdvocate
04-10-2010 10:32 PM


Re: WOW!!!
The prognosis for winning WWII was pretty bleak as well. Or as General Sherman said: "War is hell". Even General Eisenhower realized the futility as well as the neccessity of war in certain circumstances
I don't disagree with that fundamentally -- that war is often a necessary human evil, but WWII was a vastly different animal. They were literally dealing with powers who aspired and had the means of global
Yes, I agree that the prognosis is bleak. However, are we to hunker down and just wait for another 9/11 to occur?
Aren't we going to have to do that regardless?
Yes, our very presence in the Middle East is creating what the CIA refers to as 'blowback' but what is our alternative? We are damned if we do, and damned if we don't.
Right, so we might as well save some lives and money while we're at it. I just don't see what it is actually accomplishing aside from satiating the need to retaliate. If a perceivable goal was established, I would have no qualms. If ever there was a justifiable war, it would be this one. I am not contending that. I am just questioning what has been gained by it and what the ultimate goal really is.
As an active duty military person and soon to be commissioned officer myself, as well as being a humanist and ethically bound person, I feel it is because of incidents like Abu Ghraib, the My Lai Massacre, and other attrocities that we need strong, moral people to lead our military and to ensure incidents like these do not happen. War is hell, but until all people can live in peace and harmony, it is a necessary evil.
Thank you for your service and sacrifice, sir.
I have been in the military now for nearly ten years myself, so I am certainly not a conscientious objector. I believe in a strong and moral military. I even requested Afghanistan early in my career. I certainly never was opposed to it in the past, and I still may be sent there a year from now providing perimeter security for SEAL Team 3 and 5 during their raids. I will have no moral dilemma in killing someone who poses an imminent threat to my life or others. I am simply looking at it from a utilitarian perspective.
What was gained during the first year of WWII?
Not being taken over in a clear quest for global domination. If that isn't grounds for war, I don't know what is.
Again we are not invading Afghanistan.
That is true, we know we are not doing that. The perception that the Afghan's have is that we are. As somebody who values personal freedoms I have a high respect for their rights.
The government there supports are effort to route out the Taliban and Al Queda. Will it take time? Of course. But was is our alternative plan? What do you think will happen if we pull out completely tomorrow?
They plot for another attack, which they will do regardless. The can of worms has been open and I don't think you can close Pandora's Box once it has been opened, least of all through the threat of violence against people who are so brainwashed they view suicide as a means of offense.
I already said what the function of the war in Afghanistan is. Basically it is to take out key positions in the Taliban and Al-Queda and to quell them enough for the national Afghanee military to take over just as we are doing in Iraq.
I do think that not fighting on two fronts will help, since the US and coalition forces can consolidate all of their resources to one front. I am just skeptical that these terrorists can be stamped out because there is not a specific number. These people are manufactured, and the more their media and religious figures can manipulate the coalition's intent, the more anger will draw the people on the fence in to fight.
Long story short, I am not categorically stating that the war in Afghanistan is terrible, but I am stating some genuine concerns that I think need to be addressed without national pride blinding us.

"Political correctness is tyranny with manners." -- Charlton Heston

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-10-2010 10:32 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 121 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-11-2010 3:57 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024