Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,385 Year: 3,642/9,624 Month: 513/974 Week: 126/276 Day: 23/31 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Bible's Flat Earth
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3477 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 463 of 473 (554159)
04-06-2010 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 459 by New Cat's Eye
04-06-2010 12:24 PM


Topside of the Sphere
quote:
Yeah, there's just not much there. Although, its odd that the sun quickly goes back to where it started. The writer obviouly though the sun went over the earth and did not think that the path it took during the night was the same length as the day.
Maybe he wrote during the summer, shorter nights.
quote:
I don't know. It seems like he was supporting the dome-and-disc idea though.
It has been an interesting read about Ptolemy and why he went with the fixed earth. I couldn't find any more on those who believe the "sky as a tent" and how they envisioned the Earth in relation to the sky. The Greeks had the heavens as a sphere and it seems Severian was at odds with that for whatever reason. Those who were considered flat earthers didn't really seem to carry much weight at the time. It wasn't the predominant view. This article on The Scandalous Flat Earth Myth brought up more ideas of what perpetuated the flat earth myths.
It would be nice if they used verses that weren't written poetically to support their flat earth issue. It is too easy to see the "man on the street" viewpoint in the poem, as opposed to factual science.
Needless to say I haven't found a lot more on my thoughts, but it was an interesting hunt. More may surface.

Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 459 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-06-2010 12:24 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3477 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 466 of 473 (554321)
04-07-2010 12:09 PM
Reply to: Message 464 by knight4christ
04-07-2010 8:04 AM


Welcome to EvC
Welcome to EvC,
Granny has already address some of your issues, but I would like to add a bit of advice.
It helps avoid misunderstanding and keeps participants on the same page if you provide the book, chapter, and verse numbers of the scriptures you are referring to.
Again welcome and fruitful debating.

Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 464 by knight4christ, posted 04-07-2010 8:04 AM knight4christ has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3477 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 468 of 473 (554615)
04-09-2010 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 467 by rockondon
04-08-2010 9:39 PM


Re: Flat Ground or Flat Planet
quote:
If you were right about erets, Genesis 1:1 would read that "God made the heavens and some ground." Doesn't quite have that same ring to it hey?
If you need it to refer to the entire planet, no it doesn't have the same ring. It's not about ring, but reality. Yes, eretz refers to the ground beneath one's feet, but at that time the writer couldn't have been referring to the entire globe unless he knew it existed. The writer was referring to land as opposed to the sky.
Genesis 1 was a Priestly writing, which was written between 722 and 609 BCE. Show me that the writer knew he was standing on a globe. Show me that he was referring to more than what he had knowledge of.
Spherical Earth
The concept of a spherical Earth dates back to ancient Greek philosophy from around the 6th century BCE,[1] but remained a matter of philosophical speculation until the 3rd century BC when Hellenistic astronomy established the spherical shape of the earth as a physical given.
quote:
Maybe I'm going out on a limb here but "the name of the planet on which man dwells" kinda sounds like a reference to the planet Earth to me.
Dictionaries include meanings as they evolve. Earth didn't mean the name of the planet until it was deemed a planet and named. (1400 CE) Smith's Bible Dictionary is dated 1884. It was the name of the planet at that time. Show me it was considered the name of the planet at the time of the Priestly writer.
The A&E story was predominately the J&E writers. They wrote before 722 BCE. Show me they had a name for the planet or were referring to more than what they knew was inhabited.
Even Ptolemy's world map from 150 CE could only include the lands known to them. Map
quote:
Do you still want to pretend erets never refers to the planet earth? Doesn't matter to me either way since the truth of the matter is pretty obvious.
I don't need to pretend. I didn't say the word never refers to the planet earth. I said erets doesn't mean planet (which it doesn't) and that it isn't used as the name of the planet in the Bible because they didn't know they were on a planet.
It does refer to the ground beneath one's feet as opposed to the sky above. It can refer to all the land known to man at the time or part of it.
Show me the writers knew there was a whole globe to refer to.
Show me that the writers were concerned with the globe as opposed to their own people and land.
The world according to Hekateaus. Map 500 BCE
IMO, the Bible writers were not concerned with global issues. They were concerned with their people, their land, and their interactions with the peoples and kingdoms around them. The Bible writers weren't writing about science. They were writing about social issues. They described their environment creatively in poetic writings. They may be reflecting the belief of the time or just creatively describing how things look from a human viewpoint. They could also be using descriptions that are familiar to their audience regardless of what they themselves know.
I don't feel the writers were referring to a planet or a globe when they wrote for their audiences. I feel they were referring to the more limited known area around them.
Show me otherwise.
ABE: Words can have many meanings and acquire more meanings over time, but the correct meaning from the correct time has to be used within a sentence. It matters what meanings were available for the word then, not now. IOW, we can't use a meaning before its time.
Edited by purpledawn, : Added thought

Scripture is like Newton’s third law of motionfor every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words, for every biblical directive that exists, there is another scriptural mandate challenging it.
-- Carlene Cross in The Bible and Newton’s Third Law of Motion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 467 by rockondon, posted 04-08-2010 9:39 PM rockondon has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3477 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


(1)
Message 471 of 473 (554976)
04-11-2010 7:53 AM
Reply to: Message 459 by New Cat's Eye
04-06-2010 12:24 PM


Globe of Crates
I found an interesting site with ancient "world" maps.
(I don't know how to get the photos in the post so follow the links. )
The Babylonian map of 2500 BCE. Flat disk encircled by water.
We have Thales World Map in 640-546 BCE. Looks like the sphere idea is creeping in.
Thale's assistant, Anaximander, did a World Map 611-546 BCE.
The World Map according to Hecataeus 500 BCE.
The Globe of Crates (150 BCE) is the first instance I could find a a globe shape. Notice the land masses. Apparently Crates plopped the other three land masses on the map to make it even.
Notice the names of the land masses. The top right land mass was called "—cumene" which means:
Ecumene (also spelled —cumene or oikoumene) a term originally used in the Greco-Roman world to refer to the inhabited earth (or at least the known part of it).
Oikoumene is the term in the Bible that is usually translated as world or earth. Notice it is tagged to the land mass and not the globe.
The names of the other three:
Having a love of symmetry, then, he predicted three additional continents along with the oecumene: Perioeci (lit. "same latitude, other side"), Antoeci (opposite the Perioeci) and Antipodes (lit., opposite the feet).
Now this is what the Greek mathematicians and mapmakers, etc. knew. What the Hebrews knew is hard to say, but they had to be influenced in some way.
Looking at the globe of Crates, I don't feel they viewed the globe as earth, name or otherwise. I feel they viewed the inhabited land mass as earth.
I couldn't find any more on the battle between the sky as a tent or sphere. Still looking.
ABE: Interesting link. Jewish Encyclopedia - Astronomy
Edited by purpledawn, : Typo
Edited by purpledawn, : ABE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 459 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-06-2010 12:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 472 by New Cat's Eye, posted 04-12-2010 10:29 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024