Entropy in Layman's Terms

I think that this thread needs some kind of feedback to see if the explanations worsk well with the layman due to the particuliar nature of this thread. I don't have an explanation in layman's term but I can provide some feedback.I think that Rrhain's explanation works well to explain how entropy works and is easily understandable for most people. The water analogy explains well why entropy says perpetual motion machine can't exist. I also liked how he explained the difference between energy and usable energy.I thought that Son Goku explained well why entropy worked the way it does but I'm less sure that it could reach the masses because lots of people seem to dislike maths (but I may be mistaken).Overall, those were my 2 favorites explanation, Rrhain explaining how entropy works whereas Son Goku explaining why it works this way.
(If this post has no place in this thread, tell me, I will delete the content)

Did you actually read the thread? What you said had nothing to do with what the participants said. The op you quoted even said that 2Lot wasn't about order, disorder , etc.... so why are you talking about order again?

What I'm saying is that 2lot (as expressed in the op) has nothing to do with order or disorder. The passage you quoted even said it explicitely. So why are you talking about it? Are you actually disagreeing with what 2Lot says?

Obviously, Rhain is describing the 2lot separating it from the common use of order and disorder. Meaning using disorder like you used it if you actually agree with Rhain's description of the 2lot makes no sense. You are talking about disorderly and orderly energy, but what does it mean and what does it have to do with the 2lot? For example, this does have no relations at all with 2lot. 2lot only states that available energy for work decreases overtime in a closed system.

But if you believe what you says, it means you actually DISAGREE with 2lot (maybe because it doesn't invoke God or something?). This thread is to discuss how to explain what 2lot says, if you disagree with it, start another thread and show where it's wrong. By the way, if you manage to make a perpetual system, better make, proves us wrong and get the nobel prize. (In case you still didn't understand what 2lot says, it disallows the possibility of a perpetual system) Edited by AdminPD, : Warning