Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Are The Historical Respective Roles Of The Genders Relevant Today?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 116 (557455)
04-25-2010 8:39 PM


In the Wicca thread we emerged into an off topic debate on the role of the genders.
My ratings slid (nice to have low ratings=nothing to loose ) as a verbal firestorm ensued because this ole man suggested that perhaps what worked for all human cultures, relative to the role of the respective genders, for six milleniums of recorded history might work best for our times.
Let the firestorm rage on if we can get this topic promoted in the Coffee House or perhaps, if there's fear of the tables and counters being overturned, in Freeforall.
Anglagard's biting his bit to post his stuff on this and no doubt others will enjoy the verbal skirmish as well.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Eliminate word
Edited by Buzsaw, : Re-spell skirmish

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Son, posted 04-26-2010 8:46 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 4 by Huntard, posted 04-26-2010 8:47 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 6 by Coragyps, posted 04-26-2010 9:01 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 7 by caffeine, posted 04-26-2010 9:15 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 17 by Theodoric, posted 04-26-2010 12:37 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 24 by lyx2no, posted 04-26-2010 4:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 80 by anglagard, posted 04-30-2010 1:08 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 116 (557507)
04-26-2010 10:53 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Huntard
04-26-2010 8:47 AM


Apples & Oranges
Huntard writes:
Should we reinstate all things that "worked for all human cultures" in the past? Like Slavery and torture?
I see this as a strawman, Huntard. The gender thing has to do with physiology and the slave/torture thing does not.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Huntard, posted 04-26-2010 8:47 AM Huntard has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 116 (557511)
04-26-2010 11:03 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Minnemooseus
04-26-2010 10:16 AM


Re: ...more emotional and easily persuaded and manipulated...
Minnemooseus writes:
While in some situations that generalization might have some validity, I was under the impression that in the case of starting and waging wars, it's the males that are the "more emotional and easily persuaded and manipulated".
Hi Moose. Nice to see you out & about in the forum threads. Wars involve conflict, greed, ambition, protection, survival and things like that, moreso than emotion. Heck, if persuasion was easy for leaders, who were mostly men, persuasion would often trump war. Women have not traditionally been as agressive as men. They have traditionally (I say traditionally) been referred to as the fairer and weaker sex, weaker, of course relative to physical strength.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Minnemooseus, posted 04-26-2010 10:16 AM Minnemooseus has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Rahvin, posted 04-26-2010 11:38 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 116 (557513)
04-26-2010 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Coyote
04-26-2010 9:25 AM


Re: Where we started
Coyote writes:
Sounds like the old "separate but equal" nonsense. "Sorry, ladies. You're equal but you can't vote."
How about women holding property, Buz? Is that off limits too?
How about educational opportunities?
How do you feel about subservience to husbands whims and commands?
Good questions, Coyote.
1) I like the quote from Richard Cotton who was on the radio in San Diego back in the 1960s when I was out there.
Freedom is not free; free men are not equal and equal men are not free.
( men aka mankind)
This silly notion that all men are created equal is stupidity. In the first place, whether you go with evolution or creation, only one was created. The rest procreated. All are unequal in some way, physiologically, mentally, prestige, culturally, etc. More freedom has been lost by mandating equality than anything else. Last century hundreds of millions were murdered, impoverished and oppressed by governments and dummies who tried to make all men equal. It's now happening in the US of A. Diversity and freedom go hand in hand.
2) Educational opportunities should be open to all, but not necessarily provided for all by someone else's buck.
3) As I said before, men are more adapted to the leadership role and this has been the case for nearly six milleniums of human history. The Biblical way is best. If the man loves his wife as he ought, he will want the best for her. No human entity works with two equal presidents.
The problem arises with cultures such as Islam which oppresses women and men everywhere who do not practice Biblical principles such as love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness faith, meekness and self control. See Galatians or Ephesians 5:22, 23. I don't remember for sure which book.
I have to leave out of town now. Will try to do some more responding when I can.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Coyote, posted 04-26-2010 9:25 AM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by Son, posted 04-26-2010 12:28 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 20 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-26-2010 1:16 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 23 by purpledawn, posted 04-26-2010 4:09 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 50 by onifre, posted 04-27-2010 5:11 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 116 (557569)
04-26-2010 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by subbie
04-26-2010 3:18 PM


Re: Where we started
subbie writes:
Be careful not to follow Buz down his rabbit hole of insanity. He's arguing against a meaning of "all men are created equal" that no sane person has ever advocated for.
Thomas Jefferson included this phrase in the Declaration of Independence as a way of distinguishing this fledgling nation from Britain, where the monarchy ruled by the Divine Right of Kings. Jefferson simply meant that everyone should be governed by the same set of laws; that the law should apply to all people in the same way. He never meant that all people have equal abilities or that we should treat them as if they did.
What's more, nobody in power in this country has ever advocated treating all people as if they had the same abilities. This is simply another fantasy sprung from the deeply warped and disfunctional mind of Buz and other delusional creatures of his ilk.
So by that token it would be delusianal for draft laws, job descriptions, regardless of brute strength needed, front line combat, rest room laws, dress codes and a host of other gender relative matters to assume that all should be goverened by the same set of laws. The majority of the founders obviously figured voting rights weren't for everyone. No?
For nearly 6 milleniums most cultures understood that families function better with one having the leadership role rather than two presiding ones with equal authority.
Most have been traditionally sensible enough to understand that the strong one who was responsible for the safety of the family would be the one suited for the leadership role.
One area I see in modern culture is the discipline of children. It is the manly commanding lower voice, the physical strength and the relatively larger sized male that is most capable of handling the ultimate discipline of the children. We've lost much of that today with so many of the families without a male leadership role in the household. Obviously we're paying a hefty price for it culturally.
I'll quote from the prophet Isaiah in the third chapter relative to the end times. This prophecy, as are all Biblical prophecies, so on the mark with our times:
Isaiah 3 writes:
5 And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbor: the child shall behave himself proudly against the old man, and the base against the honorable.
12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they that lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by subbie, posted 04-26-2010 3:18 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Theodoric, posted 04-26-2010 9:18 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 28 by subbie, posted 04-26-2010 9:25 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 29 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-26-2010 9:33 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 30 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-26-2010 9:38 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 38 by Jaderis, posted 04-27-2010 5:54 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 46 by purpledawn, posted 04-27-2010 11:01 AM Buzsaw has replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 40 of 116 (557618)
04-27-2010 9:51 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Theodoric
04-26-2010 9:18 PM


Re: Where we started
Theodoric writes:
Discipline by physical intimidation is probably the worst way to discipline a child. Logic and love are much more effective ways to discipline and they also produce a much more productive and responsible adult than any physical form of discipline.
LOL, Theodoric. Logic and love is fine. I used it on my boys and their families who still honor and respect their mother and me. Interestingly, one of the reasons they honor, love and respect us is that when folks asked me how we made them behave so well as children, the answer was, we gave them no choice. There were times, especially when very young that some loving corporal punishment was needful in the mix of disciplinary measures.
As the Bible says, regarding God and us who believers in his son, Jesus, the christ/lord, "whom he loves he chastens." I spanked the boys a few times when very young. That was all it took to get their respect and attention that they had no choice but to obey for their own good, training and welfare.
My wife, who did a good job as well with them, usually threatened them with, "your dad will deal with this when he gets home." That was all that she needed to do. We both always had their love and respect for the way we dealt with them. The first thing my little boy would do if and when a spanking was needful, was to come back and buddy up to me, since they knew the discipline was deserved.
We still have the American Legion Boy's State framed certificates of our disciplined boys hanging on the wall in our living room. They now have excellent jobs, nice incomes and their own families, thanks to the logic/love/corporal punishment formula.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Theodoric, posted 04-26-2010 9:18 PM Theodoric has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Kitsune, posted 04-30-2010 3:19 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 116 (557619)
04-27-2010 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by DevilsAdvocate
04-26-2010 9:52 PM


Devil A. Man's Strawman Implication
Devil's Advocate man, contrary to the implication of your meanspirited display of garbauge, for the record, I've never, ever, in 55 years, laid anything but a loving hand on my wife and I don't mean disciplinary loving hand. Physical punishment was solely reserved for the children.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-26-2010 9:52 PM DevilsAdvocate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 04-27-2010 10:43 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 56 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-28-2010 7:01 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 116 (557620)
04-27-2010 10:06 AM


Buzsaw/Buzwife Partnership
For the record, my wife and I also have a partnership in which most decisions are discussed, often the wife's wishes trumping my own. There are, however times of impasse, when a divinely appointed presiding authority must break the impasse. This avoids much bickering, unrest and ultimate separation or divorce, wifey, also honoring Biblical principles, understanding her providential role in the family unit.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Straggler, posted 04-27-2010 10:58 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 116 (557622)
04-27-2010 10:22 AM


Another For The Record
Another Buz for the record is that at all elections my wife and I both make it a practice to vote. I have her totally indoctinated.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Son, posted 04-27-2010 12:18 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 49 by hooah212002, posted 04-27-2010 3:43 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 116 (557793)
04-27-2010 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by purpledawn
04-27-2010 11:01 AM


Re: Manly Commanding Voice
PD writes:
Authority to do what?
What do you feel men need authority to do?
To make the final decision when/if empasse is reached and to more or less oversee the family affairs.
PD writes:
I guess the men who don't have low commanding voices are in big trouble.
The voice is irrelevant if appropriate discipline is not administered. It doesn't matter if it's corporal discipline or non corporal discipline. Deep voiced threats without action are useless. Your children knew you would follow through with a spanking. If you hadn't followed through with the spanking, they wouldn't listen to you either because then you are all bark and no bite.
This is very true, PD. Consistency is very important. Neither my wife or I have had a problem in this respect.
PD writes:
IMO, that is also part of the problem today. Parents threaten discipline but don't follow through. Parents aren't on the same page when it comes to disciplining children. Parents are afraid the children will be upset with them. Schools have the same problem. Everyone seems afraid to upset the children.
It has nothing to do with gender Buz, it has to do with parenting skills.
It appears that you've missunderstood me. My wife's parenting skills were very efficient. However, there were times when she felt that I should deal with a disciplinary problem after I returned home from the business.
PD writes:
The only impasse my husband and I might have is money. Not very often though. We are pretty well matched. I don't defer to him because he is the boss, I defer to his decision because he brings home the money and handles the finances. He has a better handle on what we can afford.
Traditionally, this has been the case, that the wife kept the house and the husband was the breadwinner. It was so in our family. That is the ideal for the children rather than being cared for by someone else while both work. Perhaps if our material wants were less, and we were more frugal, more could live on one income.
I've never claimed that the man always has the right or better answer. We talk most decisions over before deciding. Often I consult my wife on what would be best, etc. The leadership role is not dictatorial in the home by any means. I've already explained that many decisions are left to my wife. She pretty much runs the home. She comes and goes where she wishes without consulting me and that's fine.
PD writes:
The judgment in Isaiah 3 was for Jerusalem and Judah. It has nothing to do with the United States today. I know you feel otherwise, but the text doesn't agree with you.
I know it was, but this phenomenon of oppressive children and ruling women was not contemporaneous to ancient Israel. It's happening pretty much globally now. That the prophecy was addressed to Israel is irrevelant for that reason. It was just another of the end time prophecies.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by purpledawn, posted 04-27-2010 11:01 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by caffeine, posted 04-28-2010 7:00 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 57 by Straggler, posted 04-28-2010 7:07 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 58 by purpledawn, posted 04-28-2010 7:26 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 59 by hooah212002, posted 04-28-2010 8:23 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 116 (557842)
04-28-2010 8:49 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Son
04-26-2010 8:46 AM


Re: Role Of Women Etc
Son writes:
Well, first off, I would like you to explicite the role women should have (in a general way). I think it would let the discussion be more focused. You should also explain what do you mean by working, does it mean their culture survived? That their economy was better off? Their people (men and women) happier?
As for the argument so far, that something worked before doesn't mean it will work in a changing world. Take Poland against Germany, their horses didn't work very well to counter tanks despite the fact that they had used cavalry before with sucess.
We also didn't use computers before without much problems so why use them now? Why use modern medecine? Electricity? etc.... If your argument was valid, without the use of all those things, we would be better off, right?
Hi Son. Thanks to you and others who have been patient for responses.
I apply the Biblical role of women, which was quite broad. Lydia, in the NT, a maker and seller of purple textile had a home business which afforded her the ability to keep the house, tend any children if she had any and make/sell her goods.
The role of a woman is quite well articulated in the last chapter of the wisdom book of King Solomon, chapter 31 beginning with verse 10, (ASV):
10 A worthy woman who can find?11 The heart of her husband trusteth in her,12 She doeth him good and not evil13 She seeketh wool and flax,14 She is like the merchant-ships;15 She riseth also while it is yet night,16 She considereth a field, and buyeth it;17 She girdeth her loins with strength,18 She perceiveth that her merchandise is profitable:19 She layeth her hands to the distaff,20 She stretcheth out her hand to the poor;21 She is not afraid of the snow for her household;22 She maketh for herself carpets of tapestry;23 Her husband is known in the gates,24 She maketh linen garments and selleth them,25 Strength and dignity are her clothing;26 She openeth her mouth with wisdom;27 She looketh well to the ways of her household,28 Her children rise up, and call her blessed;29 Many daughters have done worthily,30 Grace is deceitful, and beauty is vain;31 Give her of the fruit of her hands;
She diligently does what mostly pertains to the household as her husband is out being the primary breadwinner.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Son, posted 04-26-2010 8:46 AM Son has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by caffeine, posted 04-28-2010 9:57 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 64 by hooah212002, posted 04-28-2010 11:03 AM Buzsaw has seen this message but not replied
 Message 65 by Coyote, posted 04-28-2010 12:25 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 66 by hooah212002, posted 04-28-2010 1:03 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 116 (557857)
04-28-2010 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Flyer75
04-26-2010 8:55 AM


Re: Changing Times
Flyer75 writes:
That being said, times have changed Buzz and there's probably no going back at this point. Women now make decent incomes and help pay the bills, the car payments, the vacations, ect. Certainly pros and cons to this. Lifestyles go up, nicer cars, nicer home, better vacations for the kids, ect.
Just my .02 cents. It is what it is, women work now and make good money doing so...that isn't going to change.
Hi Flyer. I appreciate your sensible and good-spirited input here at EvC. Yes, I agree that things won't change. Being a Biblical prophecy buff, imo, it will change when king Jesus's 2nd advent revolutionizes the planet for the good, albeit things will continue to worsen dramatically and rather suddenly in the transition.
Yes, families have lots more nice things but relatively not so nice children who are growing up to become an ever more apostate, violent and unhappy generation.
Flyer75 writes:
Edit: I'd like to add something I just thought of. A woman's (and man's) role in society is really determined by society/culture. The role of a woman in say Rwanda is certainly going to be different then the role of a woman in America. In Rwanda, families are still trying to survive in a "pioneer" lifestyle...i.e. the man goes out and is sole job is to provide food and clothing for him family and that's it...Plasma tvs and BMW's are of zero consequence to this family. In American, 99.9% of families are no longer trying to just "put food on the table". The big question in life now is, boy, I'd really like to go to Disney World, purchase that brand new Nissan, and that 65" LCD would look great in the basement. Even in America, this aspect has changed dramatically since my dad was a boy in the 40's and 50's when he had to work the farm. Heck, my grandfather, now 90, had to drop out of school before high school to "work the farm". So of course my grandmother didn't work much...she raised the kids because money wasn't the issue....food and labor was.
Enjoy while it lasts, Flyer. As I understand the prophecies and observe, things are progressing into all nations descending into poverty, oppression as enforced distribution of wealth becomes enforced via global government etc. The American dream is on the fast track to the end of the track where the bridge is out and the chasm is deep.
I don't know how long you've been a police officer. Are you observing an increase in violence and unrest where ever you are?

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Flyer75, posted 04-26-2010 8:55 AM Flyer75 has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 116 (557858)
04-28-2010 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by caffeine
04-28-2010 9:57 AM


Re: Role Of Women Etc
Caffeine, too much black coffee. Slow down and read thoughtfully. Her business was home based. Most of the things she did were relative to her family and home.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by caffeine, posted 04-28-2010 9:57 AM caffeine has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 67 of 116 (557961)
04-28-2010 11:34 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Coyote
04-28-2010 12:25 PM


Re: Becoming Blessed, Wise & Mature
Coyote writes:
To stay young requires unceasing cultivation of the ability to unlearn old falsehoods.
Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough for Love, 1973
To become blessed, wise and mature requires unceasing vigilance in conserving historical Biblical values. Buzsaw

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Coyote, posted 04-28-2010 12:25 PM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Coyote, posted 04-29-2010 12:50 AM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 69 by purpledawn, posted 04-29-2010 8:17 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 73 of 116 (558102)
04-29-2010 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by Coyote
04-29-2010 12:50 AM


Re: Becoming Blessed, Wise & Mature
Coyote writes:
You are accepting "values" from the past without thinking about them, and without critically evaluating them -- just because they are values from the past. That's been shown to be a path that leads to uncritical acceptance of slavery and all manner of other nonsense.
Coyote, you and your friends consistently convolute my position, which that the Biblical role of the woman is to tend the house and children as the man is in the workplace, be it a fisherman, merchant in the markets, farmer, etc.
You and your friends, in your meanspirited manner, refuse to acknowledge that nearly all cultures practiced slavery and that Biblical principles relative to the slavery has been that slaves should be well treated and cared for, whereas other religions were often ruthless.
Owners were masters and workers who serve were servants as there was no ancient Hebrew word for employers, so whether one was hired or owned it was masters and servants.
As you people well know, nobody's advocating slavery or spinning from whole cloth. You just see it as a personal cheap shot.

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by Coyote, posted 04-29-2010 12:50 AM Coyote has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Apothecus, posted 04-29-2010 8:48 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 75 by Coyote, posted 04-29-2010 9:17 PM Buzsaw has replied
 Message 76 by hooah212002, posted 04-29-2010 9:39 PM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 82 by Hyroglyphx, posted 04-30-2010 10:05 AM Buzsaw has not replied
 Message 83 by purpledawn, posted 04-30-2010 3:43 PM Buzsaw has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024