Hyroglyphx,
I understand your point but I think your being a little unfair to the significance of the find, if it ever happens (I don't think it ever will). It's not fair to say that someone could have found a boat on Ararat, then wrote a story about it without being able to produce the evidence for this story outside the Bible, mainly the specifics such as the possible dimensions of the boat and the fact that was found on Ararat. Creationists get hammered on this evidence point all the time so why can you use it?
But, I do agree, even if the ark is found and is to be in complete size and shape as described on Ararat, it doesn't necessarily PROVE God. All it would be is another cooberating piece of evidence to go along with the others that have been found support at least the historicity of the OT and the Bible in general, nothing more.
Gazillions of people in history have been converted to Christianity without the visual of the ark, or the "holy grail", or any other piece of ancient artifact. I mean, can you imagine if the ark is ever found and it's even remotely proven to be close to the actual ark the pilgrimages of idiots that will throng to this thing to literally worship it like it's God itself?? I'm sure that's what God intended for the ark.