Mespo, I don't mean to question your integrity, or anybody that ends up on the wrong end of a gun, but did you read the article I referred to?
Whether the origin of regulars by god started as you claimed or not, the unit in question was using it as "regulars by GOD."
And they do not happen to end up on the wrong end of a gun by happenstance, nor are they bravely defying those who might mean them harm.
The article states that they believe they are endowed with immortality by God. That they cannot be hit no matter how many rounds are fired at them, and the commander pushes his men (as well as himself) into needlessly risky situations to try and prove his point.
This kind of hubris is not only repulsive (according to Joralex in another thread, repulsive even to God), it is putting men and equipment in harms way for no reason than religious fanaticism. Ironically the same kind of religious fanaticism and ignorance we are supposed to be fighting against.
You may have noticed they even quoted a soldier that transferred out of the unit specifically because they were acting like a bunch of lunatics.
mespo writes:
The "sniper" was a 100 millimeter North Vietnamese artillery battery and we were a dinky U.S. destroyer sitting out in the Gulf of Tonkin with high explosives raining down. But the fear was the same. So was the anger. So was the defiance.
Unless you are telling me that your ship's captain maneuvered your ship in, slowing it down with broadsides exposed to the battery, and signaled the vietnamese to please open fire and put some pepper on it, because he had a magic amulet from God that would save everyone, your comparison is simply not the same.
I would think anyone with experience in combat would have been appalled at the behavior of this unit's commander.
------------------
holmes