I certainly agree that science attempts to achieve reliable understanding and knowledge.
OK.
But it does not do so by overcoming opinions, emotions and bias.
Then in what way does it attempt to achieve a superior level of reliability of knowledge and understanding than other methods of knowing?
ou might even say that science is itself biased in favor of empirical evidence as opposed to ancient traditions.
Are you saying that science and other ancient methods of knowing are equally reliable, equally valid and equally successful in terms of results?
Do you fancy starting a thread on that topic?
No, I don't
Well I am not surprised as I don't think you can justify your rather ambiguous but nevertheless all too obvious assertions here.