Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,348 Year: 3,605/9,624 Month: 476/974 Week: 89/276 Day: 17/23 Hour: 3/8


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Creation as presented in Genesis chapters 1 and 2
ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 76 of 607 (560866)
05-17-2010 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by Peg
05-17-2010 10:57 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
i do refute your assertion that there are two creation accounts.
As I said assertions is not refutation.
Peg writes:
'these are the geneological annals which were from the beginning' ....the beginning being what was described in chpt 1:1 'in the beginning God created the heavens and earth'
ICANT writes:
I know from this verse that the following things are the history of the creation of the heaven and the earth in Genesis 1:1.
Where is the refutation there as they agree?
Peg writes:
And besides that, even Jesus commented that Adam and Eve were the ones that God created 'in the beginning'
ICANT writes:
I know from verse 7 the first life form on earth was man that God formed a man of the dust of the ground.
I also know God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and that man became a living being.
I know from verse 22 God cloned a woman from the rib He had taken from the man, and brought her to him.
Since these things took place in Genesis 1:1 which was the beginning where is the refutation as they agree.
Peg writes:
What was jesus quoting here? He was quoting Genesis 2:24 which says "That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he must stick to his wife and they must become one flesh"
Yet, Jesus says that this was the couple that God made 'in the beginning' which is what Genisis 1:1 says 'in the beginning'
ICANT writes:
I know from verse 24 the man said because of this man will leave home and cleave to his wife and they shall be one flesh.
I know from verse 7 the first life form on earth was man that God formed a man of the dust of the ground.
I also know God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and that man became a living being.
I know from verse 22 God cloned a woman from the rib He had taken from the man, and brought her to him.
Since this happened in Genesis 1:1 which was the beginning where is the refutation as they agree.
Peg writes:
So chpt 1 & 2 are discussing the same account of creation but contain different details of the same story.
Since every statement you have made is in total agreement with what I have presented there is no refutation of any point that you have raised what are you making the conclusion that they are the same account on?
Feel free to correct me on any point you raised that I missed.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Peg, posted 05-17-2010 10:57 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 12:29 AM ICANT has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 77 of 607 (560881)
05-18-2010 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by ICANT
05-17-2010 11:44 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
ICANT writes:
Since this happened in Genesis 1:1 which was the beginning where is the refutation as they agree.
let me get this straight.
Do you mean to imply that everything spoken of in Genesis chpt 1 happened in Vs 1 which states 'in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth'
and then everything in chpt 2 is an entirely different creation by God?
If thats what you mean, then i would just like to remind you that Gen chpt 2 states that the 7th day began and God proceeded to 'rest from his work' on that day.
Thus the heavens and the earth and all their army came to their completion. 2And by the seventh day God came to the completion of his work that he had made, and he proceeded to rest on the seventh day from all his work that he had made. 3And God proceeded to bless the seventh day and make it sacred, because on it he has been resting from all his work that God has created for the purpose of making
To me this implies that Gods creative works regarding the earth and mankind were completed by the end of the 6th day....and his 'resting' meant that no more creative works were forthcoming. Otherwise why would moses even say this if he kept on creating more lifeforms on the earth???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by ICANT, posted 05-17-2010 11:44 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 6:26 PM Peg has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 78 of 607 (560999)
05-18-2010 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by ICANT
05-13-2010 9:10 PM


typical ICANT
Catholic Scientist writes:
Your view requires the listing of people at the end of Gen. 4:
Why?
The only reason I would have to include them is because Stephen Langton, an Archbishop of Canterbury, put the modern chapter divisions into place in around A.D. 1227.
Was he inspired to divide the text as Moses was to record it.
I am not sure he was not inspired by his own teachings and biases.
Well now you're just being inconsistent. You pick and choose when you want to use the Chapter divisions and when you don't, and when you want to take one specific word as divinely inspired or not. You have your a priori belief and you'll twist the Bible to fit it however you need to.
There's no reason to take your particular apologetic over any other one.
That you can twist the Bible up so bad as to avoid any refutation isn't saying anything more than you're skills as a mental gymnast.
ABE:
Was he inspired to divide the text as Moses was to record it.
From your own source:
quote:
Timeframes of the Two Accounts
Scholars categorize these two stories into two separate time frames. The first is known as the Priestly (P) account because it is associated with the priestly caste of ancient Israel, while the second is known as the Jahwist (J) account because the J writer always calls the Creator, Yahweh.
The P account is dated much earlier than the J account because it is mythological in nature. Scholars believe that it was based on the Enuma Alish, an ancient Babylonian myth. The P account also tends to try to "de-mythologize the cosmological myths" (Buchner, Frank. Ph.D. "Genesis 1-3") in the final analysis. The emphasis here is on the Sabbath (the seventh day when God rested) and also on the image of mankind as being in the image of God so that man is perceived as being superior to all other of God's creations.
On the other hand, the J account is less concerned with trying to historicalize the act of creation and more interested in explaining why mankind differs from both the LORD God and the LORD God's other creations. It shows how man and woman try to become like the LORD God by means of eating the fruit of knowledge of good and evil and so are inferior to the LORD God, but also how they are separated from the LORD God's other creations because they marry, they are ashamed of their sexuality and nakedness, they must work hard for their food, and why women experience pain during childbirth.
Moses didn't write either of them...
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by ICANT, posted 05-13-2010 9:10 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 6:39 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 79 of 607 (561022)
05-18-2010 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by ICANT
05-17-2010 9:47 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Then why don't you take my message with my affirmations in it and take it apart verse by verse. It might help your understanding and you might be able to point out my misunderstanding of the two accounts.
Because I am asking why you think that the two accounts relate to different events and people. Rather than two contradictory and inconsistent accounts of the same things?
You do realize your assertions is not rebutal, don't you?
What assertion? I have simply asked you to justify why it is you think there are two separate sets of events rather than one that has been accounted for inconsistently.
So?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by ICANT, posted 05-17-2010 9:47 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 5:57 PM Straggler has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 80 of 607 (561067)
05-18-2010 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Straggler
05-18-2010 1:27 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
Because I am asking why you think that the two accounts relate to different events and people. Rather than two contradictory and inconsistent accounts of the same things?
Am I supposed to think?
I thought I was affirming that there is two separate distinct stories, as recorded in KJV Bible and supported by the LXX and Hebrew text.
I presented what the KJV says and it says there are two different stories.
I have outlined verse by verse what transpired and presented why I affirm that there are two stories recorded in the KJV.
If you believe there are two stories talking about the same events please present your case as to what you are affirming and I will then rebut your argument.
But it would save time if you just rebutted my affirmations.
Straggler writes:
What assertion? I have simply asked you to justify why it is you think there are two separate sets of events rather than one that has been accounted for inconsistently.
I don't take the following as asking for justification.
In [mid=5607720] you said.
Straggler writes:
Well it seems that you are taking blatant contradictions in the bible regarding the same people and the same biblical events and weaving your own tale of two humanities.
You made a declarative statement that I was taking blatant contradictions in the bible regarding the same people and the same biblical events and weaving my own tale of two humanities.
That is not debating.
That is trying to pick a fight by insulting my intelligence. It is your standard operating procedure.
So if you want to discuss how this is what you claim present your case.
If you don't want to present your case then refute my affirmations.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Straggler, posted 05-18-2010 1:27 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by Straggler, posted 05-18-2010 6:56 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 81 of 607 (561071)
05-18-2010 6:26 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by Peg
05-18-2010 12:29 AM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
let me get this straight.
Do you mean to imply that everything spoken of in Genesis chpt 1 happened in Vs 1 which states 'in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth'
No.
I am affirming that everything in Genesis 2:4-25 occurred in the day the heaven and earth was created in Genesis 1:1.
That day being the light period that ended at Genesis 1:2 with evening which when God added a dark period that ended with morning which God declared the first day.
I am also affirming that Genesis 1:2-31 took place some 6000+ years ago.
Peg writes:
If thats what you mean, then i would just like to remind you that Gen chpt 2 states that the 7th day began and God proceeded to 'rest from his work' on that day.
I would remind you that when Moses wrote Genesis he did not divide it into verses and chapters.
But you are stating that chapter one tells what has transpired in the day God created the heaven and the earth. Which you state was existing at Genesis 1:2 and had been for a long time.
If you would refute my affirmations you could clear up what the KJV Bible says either in my mind or yours.
Peg writes:
To me this implies that Gods creative works regarding the earth and mankind were completed by the end of the 6th day....and his 'resting' meant that no more creative works were forthcoming. Otherwise why would moses even say this if he kept on creating more lifeforms on the earth???
God ceased His creating when He created mankind male and female in Genesis 1:27. His next creation will be a New Heaven and Earth after this one melts with fervent heat.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 12:29 AM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 7:19 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 82 of 607 (561075)
05-18-2010 6:39 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by New Cat's Eye
05-18-2010 12:23 PM


Re: typical ICANT
Hi CS,
Catholic Scientist writes:
Well now you're just being inconsistent. You pick and choose when you want to use the Chapter divisions and when you don't, and when you want to take one specific word as divinely inspired or not. You have your a priori belief and you'll twist the Bible to fit it however you need to.
I can get along fine without verses and chapters as far as understanding what is written.
It just makes it a lot harder to find specific sections of the Bible as that is what the verses and chapters was introduced for.
Catholic Scientist writes:
There's no reason to take your particular apologetic over any other one.
I agree.
Anyone can believe anything they want to believe but that does not make it so.
On that note if you have and opinion why don't you take my affirmations and rebut them. Maybe we could both learn something.
Catholic Scientist writes:
Moses didn't write either of them...
As I said everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I used the site as they say there is 2 creation stories in Genesis. I don't have to agree with them as to who they think wrote the two stories or why they think two stories exist.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-18-2010 12:23 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by hotjer, posted 05-18-2010 7:48 PM ICANT has replied
 Message 94 by New Cat's Eye, posted 05-19-2010 10:39 AM ICANT has not replied

Straggler
Member
Posts: 10333
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 83 of 607 (561076)
05-18-2010 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by ICANT
05-18-2010 5:57 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Am I supposed to think?
I would have thought it was something of a prerequisite.
I have outlined verse by verse what transpired and presented why I affirm that there are two stories recorded in the KJV.
Yes you have - And the end result seems to be nothing more than an opinionated assertion on your part that two stories involving the same basic events involving people with the same names are two entirely seperate stories because you are unwilling to even entertain the idea that the bible might contradict itself in any way.
That is trying to pick a fight by insulting my intelligence. It is your standard operating procedure.
So I keep being told. Maybe people just don't like having their baseless assumptions questioned?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 5:57 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 8:55 PM Straggler has replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 84 of 607 (561083)
05-18-2010 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by ICANT
05-18-2010 6:26 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
ICANT writes:
I am also affirming that Genesis 1:2-31 took place some 6000+ years ago.
Ah i see.
Do you include the heavens/universe in that 6,000 year time frame?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 6:26 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 9:06 PM Peg has replied

hotjer
Member (Idle past 4563 days)
Posts: 113
From: Denmark
Joined: 04-02-2010


Message 85 of 607 (561090)
05-18-2010 7:48 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by ICANT
05-18-2010 6:39 PM


Re: typical ICANT
quote:
As I said everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I used the site as they say there is 2 creation stories in Genesis. I don't have to agree with them as to who they think wrote the two stories or why they think two stories exist.
God Bless,
Take a look at Genesis 36:31
quote:
31Now these are the kings who reigned in the land of Edom before any (O)king reigned over the sons of Israel.
As early as in the eleventh century CE it was pointed out that the Edomite king list in this chapter was made up of names of persons who would have reigned long after Moses had died. It was one of the earliest passages that scholars said must have been written by someone other than Moses.
Extra info: Gen 36:2-30 was written by author P and Gen 36:31-43 written by J.
For starters, you can take a look at wikipedia Documentary hypothesis - Wikipedia
In relation to my respond to you from the wikisite:
quote:
Mosaic authorship
Prior to the 17th century both Jews and Christians accepted the traditional view that Moses had written the Torah under the direct inspirationeven dictationof God. A few rabbis and philosophers asked how Moses could have described his own death (Deuteronomy 34:5—10), or given a list of the kings of Edom before those kings ever lived (Genesis 36:31—43), but none doubted the truth of the tradition, for the purpose of scholarship "was to underline the antiquity and authority of the teaching in the Pentateuch, not to demonstrate who wrote the books."[5]
w00tly w00t awesome moses guy, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 6:39 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 9:18 PM hotjer has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 86 of 607 (561100)
05-18-2010 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Straggler
05-18-2010 6:56 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Straggler,
Straggler writes:
So I keep being told. Maybe people just don't like having their baseless assumptions questioned?
My assumptions are based on what I affirmed using the text of the KJV Bible.
If you disagree that the KJV says what I affirmed then rebut my affirmations or assumptions as you put it.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Straggler, posted 05-18-2010 6:56 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by Straggler, posted 05-19-2010 12:02 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 87 of 607 (561102)
05-18-2010 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by Peg
05-18-2010 7:19 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Peg writes:
Do you include the heavens/universe in that 6,000 year time frame?
No.
I have no idea when the beginning was. That is what Genesis has recorded in Genesis 1:1.
Since it was a light period with no darkness (I assume this because the people in chapter 4 have no ages and the man was supposed to die the same day he ate the fruit. But here I may be going out on a limb that someone will saw off).
I state again.
I am affirming that there are 2 creation stories recorded in Genesis. One in Genesis 1:1 which includes the history recorded in Genesis 2:4-25. The other in Genesis 1:2-31.
I affirm the universe and earth existed prior to Genesis 1:2.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 7:19 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 11:36 PM ICANT has replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 88 of 607 (561103)
05-18-2010 9:18 PM
Reply to: Message 85 by hotjer
05-18-2010 7:48 PM


Re: typical ICANT
Hi hotjer,
hotjer writes:
w00tly w00t awesome moses guy, right?
To be able to write about things that happened over 2300 years before he was born I guess so.
Now a question for you, what information do we have today that they did not have 2000 years ago?
I know we have 2000 years of man changing God's Word. Have you been in a Christian book store lately?
I believe Moses wrote the majority of the first 5 books with Joshua writing about Moses death. But it was not impossible for Moses to write about his death as he was informed prior to his death that he would not cross Jordan into the promised land.
If you disagree with my assesment of the 2 creation stories in Genesis why not refute my affirmations.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by hotjer, posted 05-18-2010 7:48 PM hotjer has not replied

Peg
Member (Idle past 4948 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 89 of 607 (561118)
05-18-2010 11:36 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by ICANT
05-18-2010 9:06 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
ICANT writes:
I state again.
I am affirming that there are 2 creation stories recorded in Genesis. One in Genesis 1:1 which includes the history recorded in Genesis 2:4-25. The other in Genesis 1:2-31.
I affirm the universe and earth existed prior to Genesis 1:2.
i think you are confusing a very simple account
If you have a look at all ancient tablets you'll notice that none of them open with a title as we know titles today. There are no chapters and no paragraphs....just a bulk of text from start to finish. Its the same with the genesis account of creation.
However, what some researchers have discovered about ancient writings is that the first line of text, no matter how long, is actually the title for the information contained on the tablet.
If you apply that to the bible, then you can easily conclude that "In the beginning God created the heavens and earth" is simply the title for the information that follows. It has nothing to do with an account of creation, its simply Moses opening words for the information that followed. It was the title of the writing.
But yes i agree with you that the earth was created along with the heavens in the beginning which is what Gen 1:1 states. However, I dont believe that at that time, he also made animals and light and seasons etc. They came later when God began to prepare the earth for habitation....so everything from vs 2 onward is explaining that process of preparing the existing earth for habitation including the creation of the life.
It would be like God now looking at Venus, a planet that has existed for millions/billions of years, and deciding to prepare it for habitation...this would be where vs 2 comes into play.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by ICANT, posted 05-18-2010 9:06 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by ICANT, posted 05-19-2010 2:25 AM Peg has replied
 Message 91 by hotjer, posted 05-19-2010 4:41 AM Peg has not replied

ICANT
Member
Posts: 6769
From: SSC
Joined: 03-12-2007
Member Rating: 1.5


Message 90 of 607 (561140)
05-19-2010 2:25 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by Peg
05-18-2010 11:36 PM


Re: Do you care to Debate the Affirmed?
Hi Peg,
Again I am not affirming what someone else believes.
I am affirming that the KJV Bible says: "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Genesis 1:1
I am affirming that the KJV Bible says in Genesis 2:4 "2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,".
So the following things had to happen in the light period God created the heaven and earth in and it could not have happened in multiple light periods as the text is specific.
It doesn't make any difference if it is right or wrong that is what the text says.
It really doesn't make any difference who wrote it, that is what the text says.
God Bless,

"John 5:39 (KJS) Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Peg, posted 05-18-2010 11:36 PM Peg has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Peg, posted 05-19-2010 6:20 AM ICANT has replied
 Message 93 by hotjer, posted 05-19-2010 8:29 AM ICANT has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024