Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Grey Goo: Legitmate concern or hysteria?
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 7 (560764)
05-17-2010 1:19 PM


Grey Goo is a theoretical scenario based off of unintended consequenes associated with molecular nanotechnology. The fear is one of growing dependence upon technology that will lead to a technological singularity.
More specifically, is it possible for nanobots, which are theoretically designed for good causes like seeking out cancer cells and destroying them, to self-replicate and mimic something biological like bacteria through recursive self-improvement?
Computers are designed to do only what the programmer functions it to do. However, with the advent of artificial intelligence, machines are designed to problem solve. Being that these machines are now smart and also feed off of biological material, in order to replicate could they consume biological matter?
Is this fear of ecophagy through an evolving artificial intelligence more like science fiction or science fact?

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from mistaken conviction." — Blaise Pascal

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 05-18-2010 10:13 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 4 by Larni, posted 05-18-2010 10:36 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 5 by Rahvin, posted 05-18-2010 11:31 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 7 by tesla, posted 05-26-2010 10:59 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 7 (561020)
05-18-2010 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Rahvin
05-18-2010 11:31 AM


Re: A few points...
You don;t need AI for a "gray goo" scenario. All it takes is a self-replicating nano-disassembler that is able to reconstruct extremely varied source materials into energy and copies of itself. Intelligence doesn't factor into it, any more than a natural virus or bacteria needs to be smart to eat everything it's able to eat
When I say intelligence I'm not talking like cyborgs and terminators able to make complex decisions without the ability to feel empathy. It doesn't have to be that extreme, but your point stands. You're right, all that really matters is self-replicating.
I believe it is more hysteria than anything else, but I also believe that if you don't brainstorm the possibility of unintended consequences, you foolishly run headlong in to problems.
That we can even make molecular nanotechnology in and of itself is amazing. What we know of biological replicators, like viruses and bacteria, is that they have the ability to reek havoc. Even still, they haven't consumed the world, so why would a nanobot?
Even then this placing the cart way before the horse. We don't even have true nanobots yet.

"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from mistaken conviction." — Blaise Pascal

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Rahvin, posted 05-18-2010 11:31 AM Rahvin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024