The Impossibility Of The Flood

Dr Adequate, According to the Biblical record, often God effects his purposes via what we regard as natural events. When he wanted to punish Israel, his nation for idolitry etc, he didn't usually zap them directly himself. He raised up enemy nations for that specific purpose on occasion. Nebuchadnezzar's Babylon was an example Syria and Egypt were others.Germany was a "natural" agent in effecting the return of Israel to their homeland in order to fulfill the end time prophecies of the prophecied messianic kingdom in Israel.As for the flood, the natural effect of a meteor hit the magnitude of the K T event strike would (naturally) cool the atmosphere. We know there was this meteor event at some time. You can fault me for my reasons of rejecting the dating of the event but you can't fault me for applying the event to triggering an alleged flood by an alleged condensing of an alleged warm vapor canopy.What I'm saying is that you can call the canopy and the flood a myth, but you can't deny that such a meteor strike would not naturally cause the warm vapor to condense and rain to earth.According to the Biblical record which depicts a flood and warmer climate, God is an intelligent designer being who brings famine, rain, tornadoes, earthquakes, and all sorts of natural disasters to effect his purposes and manage the planet. Again you can call it all myth, but you can't separate what you call nature from him if he exists as the majority of people believe he does.We ID creationists must apply the same observed events, fossil record, historical record, etc to argue for our premises and theses that evolutionists apply to theirs, though our methodologies in application and interpretation may differ from theirs.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

An event the magnitude of a ww flood triggered by an event the magnitude of such a meteor strike atributed to the K T event implies a major sudden change in the makeup of the planet and it's atmoshere, not calculated by dating methodology.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

You haven't a clue regarding Jehovah, god of a ww flood who wiped out the world's population and who establishes ultimate justice upon earth, Subbie. Yah, he's a god of love, but as well a god of justice and wrath upon evil.No sane person would deny the presence of evil upon earth. It's an observed phenomena and evidence of what to you?It behooves Jehovah, the god of the universe, if he be true, who established certain laws for his earth creatures, to do what's best suits his purposes for the ultimate good of both planet earth and the universe at large, factoring in the freedom of choice of creatures like Satan and the rebellious angels which oppose the kingdom of Jehovah on earth.It was the forces of evil which first deceived mankind in the garden and deceived the people who ultimately caused Jehovah to wipe out the world's population in the flood and to allow Satan's agent, Hitler, to effect the restoration of his nation for the prophesied coming messianic kingdom on earth which will extablish final millenial peace upon the planet.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

Math, shmath, Jones. It's a matter of whether the flood happened and the properties of a pre-flood planet.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Says Mr. Blind Assertion.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

No. Not correct. All that is there is debatable and remains the ongoing debate in the science arena, according to premise and thesis of interpretation of the geological/biological data observed. Both camps apply the same data in determinations.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

If you think the above is silly you need to show why you think it's silly. Otherwise you're blindly asserting that it's silly.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

1) It would not produce a climate as warm as pre-flood.
2) It would not produce the same atmosphere, given the volumn of water to accomodate a flood of this magnitude.
3) It would not produce the same elements in the atmosphere of a pre-flood planet which is implicatied due to the volumn of H2O in play
4) It would not produce the same sun rays on the planet as post flood.
5) It would not produce relative uniformity in calculating dating methodology nor would it produce acurate dating data of present dating methodology used.
6) It would not produce similar weather as pre-flood.
7) It would not produce a rainbow-less atmosphere.
8) It would not produce as long a life as that of a warmer uniform atmosphere which filtered out less healthy sun rays.
9) It would not produce as level a planet surface as pre-flood.
10) It would not produce small shallower oceans as would be pre-flood.
11) It would not produce warm polar regions void of ice.
12) It would not produce large continents compared to pre-flood.
13) It would not produce nearly (by far) as little carbon on the planet and it's atmosphere, due to volcanic eruptions, etc.
14. It would not produce the same sub-terrain as pre-flood.These are a few examples of what it would not produce. Taq. Thanks for asking. I see you got a well deserved fiver for that. Edited by Buzsaw, : change wording

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.

contents deleted by BuzsawEdited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.

Doc, all methods assume a relative uniform planet. I would assume that perhaps all forms would be skewed, though I'm not able to confirm.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.