Your topic is veering all over the place. Particular assertions get refuted (snake venom as bacterial, radiometric dating, 7 day disease cycles etc. etc. etc.) but instead of defending your position or counter-arguing in any way you simply move to the item that lies next on your list of erroneous thinking via some not-even-funny ad-hominem against those refuting you.
Can I suggest that you state which of the many assertions you are making is key to your pet project and then try and defend that?
Can you actually defend your position? Or are you only able to duck and dive in an effort to avoid ever actually having to acknowledge when you have been shown to be wrong?
Boys and girls I think it may be time to quit feeding the troll. She has made no attempt to back up the myriad of her assertions. I have asked a number of times for a source for her wacky claims and as yet have been totally ignored. Maybe we should let her starve.Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
Hi Anita, There are a variety of rules here, which you seem to have neglected to follow. Why don't you read the forum guidelines and in particular please follow rules 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 10 while you consider how next to contribute to our forum.
This thread doesn't really seem to be providing much light, and plenty of heat so I'm closing it down.