IchiBan writes:
You guys use talkorigins as your comprehensive resource??
No. we're not creationists that stick to just one source, no matter what, we have more sources. Most prominent of all the actual scientific reports that show what utter bollocks creationism is.
They mostly put forth their ideas, and set up their own straw men arguments to knock down as though they were serious arguments as all that any creationist has.
Actually, they source all their claims with links to the actual scientific articles that show what utter bollocks creationism is.
Seems rather weak, since most of those arguments are about philosophy, rather than science.
You haven't actually read Talkorigns, have you?
The problems seem to arise when dime-store philosophers claim to be scientists.
Indeed, one wonders why creationists keep doing that.
Evolutionist--dime-store philosophers, yeah the shoe fits well.
Not really, an evolutionist is probably not a creationist.
No science in there though. Thats one thing the evolutionist can never be honest about.
Right, Talkorigins doesn't provide any source to their claims, just like creationists. Oh wait they do! I wonder why? Oh yes, of course, they're honest and not creationists.
Deception, the name of the game when it comes to the creationist.
There, fixed it for you.
Of course (as usual), you provide not a single shred of evidence for your assertions. You just rant and rave against evolutionists, showing how utterly stupid you really are.
Glad you wanted to show us that.
™ Version 4.2
(1)